← Home
Plato: Phaedo · 7 of 44 · tr. Benjamin Jowett

Section 1g

And he attains to the knowledge of them in their highest purity who goes to each of them with the mind alone, not allowing when in the act of thought the intrusion or introduction of sight or any other sense in the company of reason, but with the very light of the mind in her clearness penetrates into the very fight of truth in each; he has got rid, as far as he can, of eyes and ears and of the whole body, which he conceives of only as a disturbing element, hindering the soul from the acquisition of knowledge when in company with her-is not this the sort of man who, if ever man did, is likely to attain the knowledge of existence? There is admirable truth in that, Socrates, replied Simmias. And when they consider all this, must not true philosophers make a reflection, of which they will speak to one another in such words as these: We have found, they will say, a path of speculation which seems to bring us and the argument to the conclusion that while we are in the body, and while the soul is mingled with this mass of evil, our desire will not be satisfied, and our desire is of the truth. For the body is a source of endless trouble to us by reason of the mere requirement of food; and also is liable to diseases which overtake and impede us in the search after truth: and by filling us so full of loves, and lusts, and fears, and fancies, and idols, and every sort of folly, prevents our ever having, as people say, so much as a thought. For whence come wars, and fightings, and factions? whence but from the body and the lusts of the body? For wars are occasioned by the love of money, and money has to be acquired for the sake and in the service of the body; and in consequence of all these things the time which ought to be given to philosophy is lost. Moreover, if there is time and an inclination toward philosophy, yet the body introduces a turmoil and confusion and fear into the course of speculation, and hinders us from seeing the truth: and all experience shows that if we would have pure knowledge of anything we must be quit of the body, and the soul in herself must behold all things in themselves: then I suppose that we shall attain that which we desire, and of which we say that we are lovers, and that is wisdom, not while we live, but after death, as the argument shows; for if while in company with the body the soul cannot have pure knowledge, one of two things seems to follow-either knowledge is not to be attained at all, or, if at all, after death. For then, and not till then, the soul will be in herself alone and without the body. In this present life, I reckon that we make the nearest approach to knowledge when we have the least possible concern or interest in the body, and are not saturated with the bodily nature, but remain pure until the hour when God himself is pleased to release us. And then the foolishness of the body will be cleared away and we shall be pure and hold converse with other pure souls, and know of ourselves the clear light everywhere; and this is surely the light of truth. For no impure thing is allowed to approach the pure. These are the sort of words, Simmias, which the true lovers of wisdom cannot help saying to one another, and thinking. You will agree with me in that? Certainly, Socrates. But if this is true, O my friend, then there is great hope that, going whither I go, I shall there be satisfied with that which has been the chief concern of you and me in our past lives.
Themes
Body As Obstacleanthropology

The material body viewed as a prison, tomb, or source of error that hinders spiritual knowledge and return.

The text explicitly describes the body as a source of trouble that hinders knowledge by introducing desires, diseases, and fears.

All passages →
Cosmic Dualismtheology

Ontological opposition between two primal principles (light/darkness, truth/lie, spirit/matter) as the fundamental structure of reality.

The passage contrasts the pure soul with the evil mass of the body, establishing an ontological opposition between spirit and matter.

All passages →
Detachment Gelassenheitpraxis

Eckhart's Abgeschiedenheit/Gelassenheit — radical letting-go of will, image, and grasping that opens the soul to God; distinct from inner_silence (quietness) and from material renunciation, and adjacent to Sufi tark and Buddhist non-grasping as a practice rather than a metaphysical claim.

The passage advocates for letting go of eyes, ears, and bodily concerns to achieve pure knowledge.

All passages →
Divine Lighttheology

The uncreated luminous quality of the divine, sometimes experienced directly in mystical states; illumination as revelation.

The text repeatedly references the 'light of the mind' and 'clear light everywhere' as the medium through which truth is known.

All passages →
Evil As Privationtheology

Augustinian and Plotinian doctrine that evil has no positive being of its own but is a lack, distortion, or absence of the good — denying ontological dualism while preserving moral seriousness.

The body is described as a source of 'endless trouble' and 'mass of evil' that hinders knowledge rather than possessing positive being.

All passages →
Gnosis Direct Knowledgesoteriology

Salvation through direct experiential knowledge of the divine nature, not through faith, ritual, or moral works alone.

The passage defines true wisdom as pure knowledge attained through the mind's direct penetration into truth without sensory interference.

All passages →
Inner Lightanthropology

The divine spark or luminous quality residing within the human person, potentially recognisable through introspection.

The 'light of the mind' is described as penetrating into the fight of truth within each entity.

All passages →
Kingdom Withinanthropology

The claim that the divine realm is present inside the individual, accessible without external mediation.

True knowledge is located internally within the soul's clearness rather than externally through the senses.

All passages →
Mystical Unionsoteriology

The merging of the individual soul or self with the divine, transcending personal identity.

The soul is envisioned as beholding all things in themselves and conversing with other pure souls in a state of clarity.

All passages →
Return To Sourcesoteriology

The soul's journey back to its divine origin, reversing the fall into matter through stages of purification or illumination.

The passage describes the soul's liberation from the body to return to its state of pure knowledge after death.

All passages →
Self Knowledgesoteriology

The recognition of one's own true divine nature as the primary path to liberation; 'know thyself' as soteriology.

The text emphasizes that the soul must behold all things in themselves to attain wisdom and know of itself the clear light.

All passages →
Spiritual Ascentpraxis

A staged journey of the soul upward through heavenly realms or levels of being toward the divine source.

The journey described involves moving from life in the body to a state of pure knowledge after death.

All passages →
Related passages · 11 parallels
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 1 (part 9)
I have never desired to learn any sciences, but from early youth I strove after the salvation of my soul, and thought how I might inherit or possess the kingdom of heaven. Finding within myself a powerful contrarium , namely, the desires t…”
Both passages describe a mystical experience where the individual seeks to transcend the limitations of the physical body and the senses to attain a higher knowledge or truth. They emphasize the need to detach from worldly desires and the body to achieve spiritual insight and union with the divine.
greek_mystery|The Golden Verses of Pythagoras|Section 5 (part 3)
"Thou shalt not hope what thou ought'st not to hope," knowing the nature of all things, and what is possible. 55. The Gods near at hand are virtue and truth. p. 17 59, 60. The fatal strife is caused by our inclination "madly to run cou…”
Both passages emphasize the importance of purifying the soul and the body to attain higher knowledge or truth. They share the idea that the body and its desires hinder the soul's ability to achieve pure knowledge or union with the divine.
neoplatonism|Iamblichus: On the Mysteries|Chapter I
It now remains, in the last place, that we should speak concerning felicity, about which you make various inquiries, first of all proposing objections, afterwards doubting, and then interrogating. Adducing, therefore, all that is said by yo…”
Both passages discuss the pursuit of knowledge and union with the divine, emphasizing the need to transcend the physical body and its distractions to achieve true understanding and felicity.
neoplatonism|Iamblichus: On the Mysteries|Chapter II
Hence you in vain doubt, “ that it is not proper to look to human opinions .” For what leisure can he have whose intellect is directed to the Gods to look downward to the praises of men? Nor do you rightly doubt in what follows, viz. “ that…”
Both passages emphasize the need for the soul or intellect to be free from bodily distractions to attain true knowledge or divine understanding. They share a mystical focus on the purity of the mind and its ability to perceive higher truths when unencumbered by physical senses or desires.
renaissance_hermeticism|The Heroic Enthusiasts, Part I (Gli Eroici Furori)|INTRODUCTIONj
The body is in the soul, the soul is in the mind, the mind is in God. The life of the soul is the true life of the man. Of all his various faculties, that which rules all, that which exalts our nature, is Thought. By means of it we rise…”
Both passages emphasize the idea that the body is a hindrance to the soul's pursuit of higher knowledge or truth. Plato's passage argues that the body distracts the soul from attaining pure knowledge, while Bruno's passage suggests that the divine light is inherent in man but often rejected due to bodily affections. Both highlight the struggle to rise above bodily concerns to achieve spiritual or intellectual elevation.
renaissance_hermeticism|The Heroic Enthusiasts, Part II (Gli Eroici Furori)|Second Dialoguee
Now, it must be said that the outcome of the mind is that alone which is always by it desired, sought for, and embraced, and that which is more enjoyed than anything else, with which it is filled, comforted and becomes better,—that is Truth…”
Both passages emphasize the need to transcend the physical body to attain pure knowledge or truth. They share a mystical perspective that the body hinders the soul's quest for truth and wisdom, advocating for a focus on the mind or soul to achieve higher understanding.
western_esoteric|The Secret Teachings of All Ages (Manly P. Hall)|Introductione
He himself declared philosophy to be the way of true happiness and its purpose twofold: (1) to contemplate God, and (2) to abstract the soul from corporeal sense. The principles of all things he conceived to be three in number: God , matte…”
Both passages discuss the philosophical pursuit of truth and the hindrance of the body in achieving pure knowledge. They share the conceptual insight that the body is an obstacle to the soul's understanding of truth and wisdom, emphasizing the need for the soul to be free from bodily influences to attain true knowledge.
western_esoteric|The Secret Teachings of All Ages (Manly P. Hall)|Conclusionh
Philosophy would lead all men into the broad, calm vistas of truth, for the world of philosophy is a land of peace where those finer qualities pent up within each human soul are given opportunity for expression. Here men are taught the won…”
Both passages discuss the idea of the soul's journey towards true knowledge and immortality, emphasizing the need to transcend the physical body and its distractions. They share a conceptual parallel in the pursuit of wisdom and the realization of a higher, eternal existence beyond the material world.
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter XXII (part 4)
Both philosophies, that of the East and that of the West [says Müller] start from a common point, namely from the conviction that our ordinary knowledge is uncertain, if not altogether wrong. This revolt of the human mind against itself is…”
Both passages explore the concept of the soul's relationship with the divine or absolute reality, emphasizing the need to transcend the limitations of the physical body and sensory perception to attain true knowledge. They share a mystical perspective on the unity of the soul with the ultimate reality, though they come from different philosophical traditions.
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter XXII (part 14)
How many arguments, how many religious struggles, how much of violence toward the thoughts of others would be rendered unnecessary and impossible if men would only understand that nobody possesses truth, but all are seeking for it, each in…”
Both passages explore the concept of the ultimate reality or truth that transcends human senses and language. They emphasize the difficulty of expressing the ineffable nature of this reality and the need for pure, unencumbered thought to approach it.
1 more
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter XXII (part 20)
I feel as if it must mean something, something like what the Hegelian philosophy means, if one could only lay hold of it more clearly. Those who have ears to hear let them hear; to me the loving sense of its reality only comes in the artif…”
Both passages discuss the idea of achieving a higher state of understanding or knowledge through a mystical or philosophical state, where the body and its senses are seen as impediments to pure knowledge or insight. They both emphasize the need to transcend the physical to attain a deeper, more profound truth.