← Home
Select Works of Plotinus · 737 of 752 · tr. Thomas Taylor

Select Works, Section 703

Section 21 21. Could He then have made Himself otherwise than as He did? If He could we must deny Him the power to produce goodness for He certainly cannot produce evil. Power, There, is no producer of the inapt; it is that steadfast constant which is most decidedly power by inability to depart from unity: ability to produce the inapt inability to hold by the fitting; that self-making must be definite once for all since it is the right; besides, who could upset what is made by the will of God and is itself that will? But whence does He draw that will seeing that essence, source of will, is inactive in Him? The will was included in the essence; they were identical: or was there something, this will for instance, not existing in Him? All was will, nothing unwilled in Him. There is then nothing before that will: God and will were primally identical. God, therefore, is what He willed, is such as He willed; and all that ensued upon that willing was what that definite willing engendered: but it engendered nothing new; all existed from the first. As for his "self-containing," this rightly understood can mean only that all the rest is maintained in virtue of Him by means of a certain participation; all traces back to the Supreme; God Himself, self-existing always, needs no containing, no participating; all in Him belongs to Him or rather He needs nothing from them in order to being Himself. When therefore you seek to state or to conceive Him, put all else aside; abstracting all, keep solely to Him; see that you add nothing; be sure that your theory of God does not lessen Him. Even you are able to take contact with Something in which there is no more than That Thing itself to affirm and know, Something which lies away above all and is- it alone- veritably free, subject not even to its own law, solely and essentially That One Thing, while all else is thing and something added.
Themes
Anthropomorphismtheology

Attributing human characteristics, emotions, or form to the divine; embodied divine imagery.

The text uses personal pronouns like 'He' and attributes will, while simultaneously acknowledging these terms are not strictly applicable.

All passages →
Divine Hiddennesstheology

The supreme God's radical concealment beyond ordinary knowledge or perception; the Hidden Father.

The admission that terms are not strictly applicable implies the Supreme is beyond ordinary conceptual grasp.

All passages →
Divine Providencetheology

Pronoia — the doctrine that the divine actively orders the unfolding of the cosmos and human affairs toward intelligible ends, against pure chance or blind necessity.

The Principle is described as the means of determination to everything else, ordering others to be self-belonging.

All passages →
Emanation Hierarchycosmology

A chain of divine beings or principles flowing downward from a single transcendent source (the One or the Father), each level less perfect than the one above.

The mention of a 'fragment' of the Good being desirable to the 'extern' implies a hierarchy or flow from source to recipient.

All passages →
Return To Sourcesoteriology

The soul's journey back to its divine origin, reversing the fall into matter through stages of purification or illumination.

The description of every being pursuing its good and partaking of it implies a movement back toward the Principle.

All passages →
Spiritual Ascentpraxis

A staged journey of the soul upward through heavenly realms or levels of being toward the divine source.

The pursuit of the good and drawing on it suggests an upward movement or ascent toward the divine Principle.

All passages →
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

[auto] The passage explicitly states that terms used for the Supreme are 'not strictly applicable' and warns against forming concepts that imply duality.

All passages →
Divine Simplicitytheology

The doctrine that God has no parts, divisions, or composite attributes; pure undivided being.

[auto] The text argues that will and essence in the Supreme must be identical and insists against making the Supreme a duality.

All passages →
Living Godtheology

The divine conceived as active, present, and dynamic—not an abstract principle but a personal responsive reality.

[auto] The Supreme is described as having will, being master of Himself, and acting according to His own nature.

All passages →
Monadcosmology

The absolutely simple, undivided first principle from which all multiplicity and existence flows.

[auto] The passage describes 'The Supreme', 'The Principle', and 'The Good' as the singular source from which fragments derive desirability.

All passages →
Mystical Unionsoteriology

The merging of the individual soul or self with the divine, transcending personal identity.

[auto] The passage describes beings drawing on their good such that their being becomes their choice, implying a union with the Principle.

All passages →
Opposites Transcendedanthropology

The dissolution of binary oppositions (male/female, inner/outer, above/below) as a mark of spiritual completion.

[auto] The author insists that the Supreme cannot be a duality and that will and essence are one, transcending binary distinctions.

All passages →
Paradox As Teachingethics

Using apparent contradiction, reversal, or riddle to destabilise ordinary understanding and induce insight.

[auto] The text admits to using inaccurate terms and apparent dualities merely for the sake of conveying conviction about a non-dual reality.

All passages →
Unity Of Beingtheology

The doctrine that all existence is ultimately one substance or one divine reality; non-duality as a theological claim.

[auto] It asserts that in the Supreme, will, essence, and being are identical rather than distinct components.

All passages →
Related passages · 9 parallels
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 4, Section 1s
And if any one says that it is productive, and that by the destruction of one thing it giveth birth to somewhat else, the true answer is that it doth not so qua destructive. Qua destructive and evil it only destroys and debases; but it tak…”
Both passages explore the nature of the Good and its relationship to evil and creation. They share a conceptual parallel in discussing the primacy and purity of the Good, and how evil is a lack or absence of the Good, rather than a substantive force.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 4, Section 1{
127 There remains but one alternative: Evil is a weakness and deficiency of Good. 31. Good things have all one cause. If evil is opposed to the Good, then hath evil many causes. The efficient causes of evil results, however, are not any…”
Both passages explore the nature of evil in relation to the divine. Plotinus argues that God's will is identical with His essence and that evil is not a product of divine power. Similarly, the second passage posits that evil is a deficiency of good and lacks substantial being, deriving any power it has from an admixture with the Good.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 4, Section 1„
Good cannot have produced it because a thing cannot produce its own opposite; evil cannot have produced itself because evil is always destructive and never productive. All things that exist are produced by the Good or the desire for the Go…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine and the impossibility of evil originating from the divine. They explore the concept of the Good as the ultimate source and the nature of existence and non-existence in relation to the divine.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 5, Section 1e
And if these Universals exist by participating in Existence, far more is this true of the things which participate in them. 6. Thus the first gift which the Absolute and Transcendent Goodness bestows is that of mere Existence, and so It d…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine as a unified, self-contained source of all existence and being. They explore the concept of the divine will and the emanation of all things from this singular, transcendent source, showing a genuine conceptual parallel.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 1 (part 4)
Let them, therefore, again go out with their will from their wilful ignorance or malignity and enter again into the will of God." ( Menschwerdung , 3, 5.) All this goes to show that it is useless and vain to seek for divine wisdom, meaning…”
Both passages explore the concept of the divine will and its relationship to the essence of the Supreme or God. They emphasize the unity of will and being in the divine, though they come from different mystical traditions (Neoplatonism and Christian mysticism).
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 2 (part 5)
The will beholding itself in the mirror of wisdom causes its own image to appear within the groundlessness, and thus it creates a foundation in its own imagination." ( Menschwerdung , ii. 1.) "Wisdom, the eternal virgin, the playmate of Go…”
Both passages explore the concept of the Supreme or Divine as a self-willing, self-caused entity. They discuss the unity of will and essence in the Divine, and how the Divine's existence is a result of its own will, though the language and specific metaphors differ.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 7 (part 5)
13.) Man can attain real similarity to God and perfect beatitude only by decisively willing to put his will into the Son, as the Heart or Light of the Father. "God has the eternal and unchangeable will to generate His Heart and his Son, an…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the Supreme or God, emphasizing the unity of will and essence. They explore the idea that the divine being is self-determined and self-caused, with a focus on the will as a fundamental aspect of existence.
hermeticism|Corpus Hermeticum 6: The All-Father|Section 1a
In God Alone Is Good And Elsewhere Nowhere <This sermon on the nature of the Good, like To Asclepius (CH II), relies heavily on the technical language of classical Greek philosophy - a point which some of Mead's translations tend to obscure…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the Supreme Good or God, emphasizing its self-caused, self-sufficient, and willing nature. They share the concept of the Good as an eternal, unchanging principle that is the source of all.
hermeticism|Corpus Hermeticum 14: The Discourse of Hermes to Ammon|Section 1b
Now if the Maker is naught else but That which makes, Alone, Simple, Uncompound, it needs must do this [making] to Itself,—to Which its Maker’s making is “its being made.” 2 And as to all that’s being made,—it cannot be p. 261 [paragraph c…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine as the ultimate creator and the relationship between the creator and creation. They explore the idea that the divine is the source of all things and that the act of creation is intrinsic to the divine nature.