← Home
Select Works of Plotinus · 696 of 752 · tr. Thomas Taylor

Select Works, Section 664

Section 25 25. It is in view, probably, of this difficulty that Plato, in the Philebus, makes pleasure an element in the Term; the good is not defined as a simplex or set in Intellectual-Principle alone; while he rightly refrains from identifying the good with the pleasant, yet he does not allow Intellectual-Principle, foreign to pleasure, to be The Good, since he sees no attractive power in it. He may also have had in mind that the good, to answer to its name, must be a thing of delight and that an object of pursuit must at least hold some pleasure for those that acquire and possess it, so that where there is no joy the good too is absent, further that pleasure, implying pursuit, cannot pertain to the First and that therefore good cannot. All this was very well; there the enquiry was not as to the Primal Good but as to ours; the good dealt with in that passage pertains to very different beings and therefore is a different good; it is a good falling short of that higher; it is a mingled thing; we are to understand that good does not hold place in the One and Alone whose being is too great and different for that. The good must, no doubt, be a thing pursued, not, however, good because it is pursued but pursued because it is good. The solution, it would seem, lies in priority: To the lowest of things the good is its immediate higher; each step represents the good to what stands lower so long as the movement does not tend awry but advances continuously towards the superior: thus there is a halt at the Ultimate, beyond which no ascent is possible: that is the First Good, the authentic, the supremely sovereign, the source of good to the rest of things. Matter would have Forming-Idea for its good, since, were it conscious, it would welcome that; body would look to soul, without which it could not be or endure; soul must look to virtue; still higher stands Intellectual-Principle; above that again is the principle we call the Primal. Each of these progressive priors must have act upon those minors to which they are, respectively, the good: some will confer order and place, others life, others wisdom and the good life: Intellectual-Principle will draw upon the Authentic Good which we hold to be coterminous with it, both as being an Activity put forth from it and as even now taking light from it. This good we will define later.
Themes
Divine Hiddennesstheology

The supreme God's radical concealment beyond ordinary knowledge or perception; the Hidden Father.

The Good is described as 'Transcendent' and beyond normal intellection, indicating concealment.

All passages →
Inner Silencepraxis

The practice of stilling the mind and speech to open receptivity to divine knowledge or presence.

The instruction to leave 'all else aside' implies a quieting of the mind to focus on the Transcendent.

All passages →
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

[auto] The text negates standard intellectual perception ('looking void of Intellection') to describe the relation to the Good.

All passages →
Divine Simplicitytheology

The doctrine that God has no parts, divisions, or composite attributes; pure undivided being.

[auto] It emphasizes that the Transcendent is a 'unity' that cannot be known as a multiplicity or broken into parts.

All passages →
Emanation Hierarchycosmology

A chain of divine beings or principles flowing downward from a single transcendent source (the One or the Father), each level less perfect than the one above.

[auto] The passage outlines levels of reality including 'heaven', 'Intellectual-Principle', and 'The Good' in a descending order.

All passages →
Gnosis Direct Knowledgesoteriology

Salvation through direct experiential knowledge of the divine nature, not through faith, ritual, or moral works alone.

[auto] The passage discusses 'Intellection of that unity' as the means of knowing the Good directly.

All passages →
Living Godtheology

The divine conceived as active, present, and dynamic—not an abstract principle but a personal responsive reality.

[auto] The text instructs to think of the relation 'not as looking but as living' and mentions 'total Living-Form'.

All passages →
Monadcosmology

The absolutely simple, undivided first principle from which all multiplicity and existence flows.

[auto] The passage references 'The Good' and 'unity' as the single source from which Ideas and Being flow.

All passages →
Mystical Unionsoteriology

The merging of the individual soul or self with the divine, transcending personal identity.

[auto] It describes the Intellectual-Principle as 'dependent upon That' and 'kept itself turned Thither', implying a union.

All passages →
Opposites Transcendedanthropology

The dissolution of binary oppositions (male/female, inner/outer, above/below) as a mark of spiritual completion.

[auto] It rejects viewing unity as multiplicity, transcending the binary of one and many in the higher realm.

All passages →
Return To Sourcesoteriology

The soul's journey back to its divine origin, reversing the fall into matter through stages of purification or illumination.

[auto] The text describes a movement of turning 'Thither' toward The Good, reversing the state of multiplicity to return to unity.

All passages →
Spiritual Ascentpraxis

A staged journey of the soul upward through heavenly realms or levels of being toward the divine source.

[auto] The passage explicitly urges the soul to 'make haste yet higher' and move 'above this heaven of ours' toward the source.

All passages →
Unity Of Beingtheology

The doctrine that all existence is ultimately one substance or one divine reality; non-duality as a theological claim.

[auto] It states that everything possesses the 'universal good transcendent over all' and a 'single Idea'.

All passages →
Related passages · 6 parallels
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 3 (part 1)
p. 71 CHAPTER III. THE SEVEN PROPERTIES OR QUALITIES OF ETERNAL NATURE. 1 I. ♄ ☾ II. ☿ ♃ III. ♂ ♀ IV. ☉ V. ♀ ♂ VI. ♃ ☿ VII. ☾ ♄ When the Eternal One, in its aspect as a Trinity and with reference to divine wisdom, reveals itself o…”
Both passages discuss the concept of a transcendent, divine principle that is the source of all existence and knowledge. Plotinus describes the Good as the ultimate source of being and intellection, while Boehme discusses the Eternal One revealing itself through seven qualities, both emphasizing the unity and multiplicity of divine nature.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 4 (part 1)
p. 89 CHAPTER IV. CREATION. Everything we see in nature is manifested truth; only we are not able to recognise it as such, unless the truth is manifest within ourselves. God is the supreme, fundamental, universal, self-existent eternal…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine and its relationship to creation and intellect. They explore the idea of a transcendent good or God that is the source of all being and knowledge, though they come from different mystical traditions.
hermeticism|Corpus Hermeticum 1: Poimandres|Section 1b
But when He raised His head, I see in Mind the Light, [but] now in Powers no man could number, and Cosmos grown beyond all bounds, and that the Fire was compassed round about by a most mighty Power, and [now] subdued had come unto a stand.…”
Both passages discuss the concept of a transcendent, divine principle (The Good in Plotinus, the Logos and Mind in the Hermetic text) that is the source of all existence and knowledge. They also describe a hierarchical structure of reality emanating from this principle.
hermeticism|Corpus Hermeticum 10: The Sermon on the Mount|Section 1b
For It doth will to be, and It is both Itself and most of all by reason of Itself. Indeed, all other things beside are just bacause of It; for the distinctive feature of the Good is "that it should be known". Such is the Good, O Tat. Tat…”
Both passages discuss the concept of the Good as a transcendent, all-encompassing principle that is the source of all being and knowledge. They also describe the transformative effect of contemplating this Good on the soul or intellect.
platonism|Plato: Republic|Section 1m
Yes, I said, that they should begin by reproaching us with our ignorance of the good, and then presume our knowledge of it-- for the good they define to be knowledge of the good, just as if we understood them when they use the term `good'--…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the good and the difficulties in defining it. They explore the relationship between the good, pleasure, and the highest principles, showing a conceptual parallel in their mystical traditions.
platonism|Plato: Republic|Section 1n
And you would say the same of the conception of the good? Until the person is able to abstract and define rationally the idea of good, and unless he can run the gauntlet of all objections, and is ready to disprove them, not by appeals to o…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the good and the highest principles in their respective philosophical traditions. They explore the idea of the good as something that is pursued and the hierarchy of goods leading to the ultimate good, though from different philosophical perspectives.