← Home
Select Works of Plotinus · 579 of 752 · tr. Thomas Taylor

Select Works, Section 553

Section 15 15. How then do the four genera complete Substance without qualifying it or even particularizing it? It has been observed that Being is primary, and it is clear that none of the four- Motion, Stability, Difference, Identity- is distinct from it. That this Motion does not produce Quality is doubtless also clear, but a word or two will make it clearer still. If Motion is the Act of Substance, and Being and the Primaries in general are its Act, then Motion is not an accidental attribute: as the Act of what is necessarily actual [what necessarily involves Act], it is no longer to be considered as the complement of Substance but as Substance itself. For this reason, then, it has not been assigned to a posterior class, or referred to Quality, but has been made contemporary with Being. The truth is not that Being first is and then takes Motion, first is and then acquires Stability: neither Stability nor Motion is a mere modification of Being. Similarly, Identity and Difference are not later additions: Being did not grow into plurality; its very unity was a plurality; but plurality implies Difference, and unity-in-plurality involves Identity. Substance [Real Being] requires no more than these five constituents; but when we have to turn to the lower sphere, we find other principles giving rise no longer to Substance (as such) but to quantitative Substance and qualitative: these other principles may be regarded as genera but not primary genera.
Themes
Correspondencecosmology

The Hermetic axiom that the structure of the cosmos is reflected at every scale — 'as above, so below; as within, so without' — making each level a legible map of the others.

The text contrasts the particular identity of Sense with the generic status of the Intellectual order, reflecting the archetype-participant relationship.

All passages →
Divine Simplicitytheology

The doctrine that God has no parts, divisions, or composite attributes; pure undivided being.

It describes Identity and Difference as primary genera that cannot be identified with any particular being, implying a lack of composite attributes.

All passages →
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

[auto] It asserts that nothing can be predicated of the primary genera as denoting their essential nature, employing negative definition.

All passages →
Emanation Hierarchycosmology

A chain of divine beings or principles flowing downward from a single transcendent source (the One or the Father), each level less perfect than the one above.

[auto] The passage distinguishes between the Intellectual order and the thing of Sense, indicating a structured hierarchy of reality.

All passages →
Unity Of Beingtheology

The doctrine that all existence is ultimately one substance or one divine reality; non-duality as a theological claim.

[auto] The text focuses on the ontological distinction between Being itself and participants in Being or species of Being.

All passages →
Related passages · 1 parallel
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 2, Section 1l
166 περὶ ἡνωμένης καὶ διακεκριμένης θεολογίας καὶ τίς ἡ θεία ἕνωσις καὶ διάκρισις. 167 The point of this section is that God’s Nature is not a sum total of separate Attributes. Therefore when we say that the Scriptural titles of God are o…”
Both passages discuss the nature of being and the interrelationship of its attributes. Passage A explores the unity of substance and its inherent qualities, while Passage B discusses the unity and distinction within the Trinity, emphasizing that God's nature is not divided. Both texts grapple with the concept of unity and plurality within a divine context.