← Home
Select Works of Plotinus · 577 of 752 · tr. Thomas Taylor

Select Works, Section 551

Section 13 13. We turn to ask why Quantity is not included among the primary genera, and Quality also. Quantity is not among the primaries, because these are permanently associated with Being. Motion is bound up with Actual Being [Being-in-Act], since it is its life; with Motion, Stability too gained its foothold in Reality; with these are associated Difference and Identity, so that they also are seen in conjunction with Being. But number [the basis of Quantity] is a posterior. It is posterior not only with regard to these genera but also within itself; in number the posterior is divided from the prior; this is a sequence in which the posteriors are latent in the priors [and do not appear simultaneously]. Number therefore cannot be included among the primary genera; whether it constitutes a genus at all remains to be examined. Magnitude [extended quantity] is in a still higher degree posterior and composite, for it contains within itself number, line and surface. Now if continuous magnitude derives its quantity from number, and number is not a genus, how can magnitude hold that status? Besides, magnitudes, like numbers, admit of priority and posteriority. If, then, Quantity be constituted by a common element in both number and magnitude, we must ascertain the nature of this common element, and consider it, once discovered, as a posterior genus, not as one of the Primaries: thus failing of primary status, it must be related, directly or indirectly, to one of the Primaries. We may take it as clear that it is the nature of Quantity to indicate a certain quantum, and to measure the quantum of the particular; Quantity is moreover, in a sense, itself a quantum. But if the quantum is the common element in number and magnitude, either we have number as a primary with magnitude derived from it, or else number must consist of a blending of Motion and Stability, while magnitude will be a form of Motion or will originate in Motion, Motion going forth to infinity and Stability creating the unit by checking that advance. But the problem of the origin of number and magnitude, or rather of how they subsist and are conceived, must be held over. It may, thus, be found that number is among the primary genera, while magnitude is posterior and composite; or that number belongs to the genus Stability, while magnitude must be consigned to Motion. But we propose to discuss all this at a later stage.
Themes
Body As Obstacleanthropology

The material body viewed as a prison, tomb, or source of error that hinders spiritual knowledge and return.

The sensible world is characterized as a shadow and incomplete abstraction, implying material existence hinders access to True Being.

All passages →
Correspondencecosmology

The Hermetic axiom that the structure of the cosmos is reflected at every scale — 'as above, so below; as within, so without' — making each level a legible map of the others.

Describes sensible things as a 'shadow' or portrait of True Being, implying a reflection relationship.

All passages →
Divine Simplicitytheology

The doctrine that God has no parts, divisions, or composite attributes; pure undivided being.

True Being is described as complete and unified, implying a non-composite nature compared to the fragmented sensible world.

All passages →
Logoscosmology

The divine reason, word, or ordering principle through which the universe was created; mediates between the transcendent God and the material world.

References a 'single Reason-Principle' as a characteristic of the higher sphere associated with Stability.

All passages →
Paradox As Teachingethics

Using apparent contradiction, reversal, or riddle to destabilise ordinary understanding and induce insight.

Uses paradoxical language like 'same and not the same' to explain the relationship between Being and Motion.

All passages →
Cosmic Dualismtheology

Ontological opposition between two primal principles (light/darkness, truth/lie, spirit/matter) as the fundamental structure of reality.

[auto] A clear distinction is drawn between the complete True Being/Archetype and the deficient, shadowy Sensible world.

All passages →
Emanation Hierarchycosmology

A chain of divine beings or principles flowing downward from a single transcendent source (the One or the Father), each level less perfect than the one above.

[auto] The passage outlines a structured relationship between Soul, Intellect, and True Being/Archetype, reflecting the Neoplatonic descending order of reality.

All passages →
Opposites Transcendedanthropology

The dissolution of binary oppositions (male/female, inner/outer, above/below) as a mark of spiritual completion.

[auto] The passage describes how distinctions like Being and Life are separable in thought but unified in the Archetype, transcending binary oppositions.

All passages →
Unity Of Beingtheology

The doctrine that all existence is ultimately one substance or one divine reality; non-duality as a theological claim.

[auto] The text emphasizes that Substance and Motion form a unity in True Being, contrasting with their separation in the sensible realm.

All passages →
Related passages · 5 parallels
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 3 (part 1)
p. 71 CHAPTER III. THE SEVEN PROPERTIES OR QUALITIES OF ETERNAL NATURE. 1 I. ♄ ☾ II. ☿ ♃ III. ♂ ♀ IV. ☉ V. ♀ ♂ VI. ♃ ☿ VII. ☾ ♄ When the Eternal One, in its aspect as a Trinity and with reference to divine wisdom, reveals itself o…”
Both passages explore the nature of existence and the interplay between different fundamental aspects of reality. Plotinus discusses the concepts of Substance, Motion, and Stability as interconnected yet distinct entities, while Boehme describes the seven properties of eternal nature as different forms of divine manifestation. Both texts emphasize the unity and interdependence of these aspects within a broader metaphysical framework.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 3 (part 2)
The last generates the first, as well as the first the second, the third the fourth, up to the last. They are all seven equally eternal." ( Aurora , x. 2.) "If I am sometimes describing only two or three as being active in the generation…”
Both passages discuss the interrelationship and coexistence of different fundamental principles or entities. Passage A from Plotinus explores the concepts of Substance, Motion, and Stability within the context of Intellect and Soul, while Passage B from the Aurora and other texts describes the seven spirits of God and their eternal, interdependent relationships. Both texts emphasize the unity and distinction of these principles, highlighting their coexistence and mutual glorification.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 4 (part 3)
7.) "We cannot reasonably suppose any formation or differentiation to have existed in the eternal One from which, or according to which (formation) something could have been made; for if such a form, or predisposition to making a form, had…”
Both passages explore the nature of being, motion, and stability (or change) within a divine or metaphysical context. They discuss the interplay between these concepts and how they relate to the divine essence, albeit from different philosophical and theological traditions.
hermeticism|Corpus Hermeticum 1: Poimandres|Section 1b
But when He raised His head, I see in Mind the Light, [but] now in Powers no man could number, and Cosmos grown beyond all bounds, and that the Fire was compassed round about by a most mighty Power, and [now] subdued had come unto a stand.…”
Both passages explore the relationship between Being, Motion, and Stability (or Life and Light in Passage B), and the unity and separation of these concepts. They both delve into the nature of the divine and the cosmos, discussing the interplay between different aspects of existence and the role of the divine intellect or Mind.
hermeticism|Corpus Hermeticum 11: The Hymn|Section 1c
It must, then, be that such a one as this must be some one who's wholly One. 9. For as the many motions of them [all] are different, and as their bodies are not like, yet has one speed been ordered for them all, it is impossible that ther…”
Both passages explore the relationship between Being, Motion, and Stability (or Life), and the unity and separation of these concepts. They discuss the nature of existence and the role of a higher principle (Intellect in Plotinus, God in Hermes) in maintaining this existence.