← Home
Select Works of Plotinus · 575 of 752 · tr. Thomas Taylor

Select Works, Section 549 (part 2)

In the first place, the point is common to lines and yet is not their genus, and this unity we are considering may also be common to numbers and not be their genus- though, we need hardly say, the unity of Unity-Absolute is not that of the numbers, one, two and the rest. Secondly, in Being there is nothing to prevent the existence of prior and posterior, simple and composite: but unity, even if it be identical in all the manifestations of Being, having no differentiae can produce no species; but producing no species it cannot be a genus.
Themes
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

The nature of Unity-Absolute is partially defined by negation, stating it could never yield discrete plurality.

All passages →
Body As Obstacleanthropology

The material body viewed as a prison, tomb, or source of error that hinders spiritual knowledge and return.

Bodies are characterized as multiplicity and divergence from Reality, suggesting they are less real than the unifying Soul.

All passages →
Evil As Privationtheology

Augustinian and Plotinian doctrine that evil has no positive being of its own but is a lack, distortion, or absence of the good — denying ontological dualism while preserving moral seriousness.

The text implies that defect or multiplicity in bodies represents a divergence from Reality and Unity, aligning with the privation theory of evil.

All passages →
Separation From Sourcesoteriology

The felt condition of exile from one's divine origin — Rumi's reed flute torn from its bed, Plotinus's 'we have forgotten,' the Gnostic forgetfulness; the affective wound that complements return_to_source and gives the return its motive.

The passage describes bodies as taking rise from unity but involving a divergence from Reality, indicating an ontological separation.

All passages →
Divine Simplicitytheology

The doctrine that God has no parts, divisions, or composite attributes; pure undivided being.

[auto] The passage contrasts the undivided nature of Unity with the composite multiplicity of bodies founded on parts, shape, and magnitude.

All passages →
Emanation Hierarchycosmology

A chain of divine beings or principles flowing downward from a single transcendent source (the One or the Father), each level less perfect than the one above.

[auto] The text outlines a downward flow of existence where bodies derive from Soul (a pluralized unity), which in turn derives from Unity-Absolute.

All passages →
Logoscosmology

The divine reason, word, or ordering principle through which the universe was created; mediates between the transcendent God and the material world.

[auto] Soul is identified as the creative principle composed of Reason-Principles that order the multiplicity found in material bodies.

All passages →
Monadcosmology

The absolutely simple, undivided first principle from which all multiplicity and existence flows.

[auto] The concept of 'Unity-Absolute' is presented as the undivided source from which all multiplicity and existence flows.

All passages →
Unity Of Beingtheology

The doctrine that all existence is ultimately one substance or one divine reality; non-duality as a theological claim.

[auto] The passage centrally argues that all bodily elements spring from a single unity and that divergence from unity constitutes a divergence from Reality itself.

All passages →
Related passages · 4 parallels
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 13, Section 1f
Thus in the form “1 x 1” the first figure represents the unity underlying all numbers, the second figure represents unity as a particular number among other numbers. The first figure may thus be taken as a symbol of the Godhead, the second…”
Both passages discuss the concept of unity and its relationship to being and numbers, exploring the distinction between absolute unity and created unity, and the nature of the divine as undifferentiated unity.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 3 (part 2)
The last generates the first, as well as the first the second, the third the fourth, up to the last. They are all seven equally eternal." ( Aurora , x. 2.) "If I am sometimes describing only two or three as being active in the generation…”
Both passages discuss the concept of unity and multiplicity within a divine or metaphysical framework. Passage A explores the idea of a pluralized unity in the context of Soul, while Passage B describes the interrelationship and eternal nature of seven divine spirits. Both texts emphasize the coexistence of unity and diversity within a higher reality.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 4 (part 3)
7.) "We cannot reasonably suppose any formation or differentiation to have existed in the eternal One from which, or according to which (formation) something could have been made; for if such a form, or predisposition to making a form, had…”
Both passages explore the concept of unity and plurality in the context of creation and the divine. Plotinus discusses the unity of Soul and its pluralized nature, while the second passage discusses the unity of God and the plurality of creation, emphasizing the divine desire and love as the cause of creation.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 11 (part 7)
48.) "The soul and the Word are not one or one being. The soul is born from the centre of nature, from the essences, and belongs to the body, for she issues from the essences of the body, and attracts to herself the body; but the Word is f…”
Both passages explore the relationship between the soul and a higher, divine principle. Passage A discusses the unity and plurality of the soul and its connection to the Absolute, while Passage B describes the soul's interaction with the Word (divine principle), highlighting how the Word penetrates and illuminates the soul without altering its essence.