← Home
Select Works of Plotinus · 529 of 752 · tr. Thomas Taylor

Select Works, Section 506

Section 14 14. There is, thus, a Nature comprehending in the Intellectual all that exists, and this Principle must be the source of all. But how, seeing that the veritable source must be a unity, simplex utterly? The mode by which from the unity arises the multiple, how all this universe comes to be, why the Intellectual-Principle is all and whence it springs, these matters demand another approach. But on the question as to whether the repulsive and the products of putridity have also their Idea- whether there is an Idea of filth and mud- it is to be observed that all that the Intellectual-Principle derived from The First is of the noblest; in those Ideas the base is not included: these repulsive things point not to the Intellectual-Principle but to the Soul which, drawing upon the Intellectual-Principle, takes from Matter certain other things, and among them these. But all this will be more clearly brought out, when we turn to the problem of the production of multiplicity from unity. Compounds, we shall see- as owing existence to hazard and not to the Intellectual-Principle, having been fused into objects of sense by their own impulse- are not to be included under Ideas. The products of putrefaction are to be traced to the Soul's inability to bring some other thing to being- something in the order of nature, which, else, it would- but producing where it may. In the matter of the arts and crafts, all that are to be traced to the needs of human nature are laid up in the Absolute Man. And before the particular Soul there is another Soul, a universal, and, before that, an Absolute-Soul, which is the Life existing in the Intellectual-Principle before Soul came to be and therefore rightly called [as the Life in the Divine] the Absolute-Soul.
Themes
Active Contemplationpraxis

A form of meditation that uses imagery, imagination, or symbolic thought rather than purely empty stillness.

The passage details the intellectual act and the handling of intellectual objects as a form of authentic cognitive engagement.

All passages →
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

The passage negates the idea that God comes to be through thinking, limiting human conceptual power over the divine.

All passages →
Inner Lightanthropology

The divine spark or luminous quality residing within the human person, potentially recognisable through introspection.

The Intellectual-Principle is described as self-present and entering the soul, functioning as an internal illumination.

All passages →
Opposites Transcendedanthropology

The dissolution of binary oppositions (male/female, inner/outer, above/below) as a mark of spiritual completion.

The distinction between the intellectual act and the intellectual object is dissolved in the Intellectual-Principle where they are one.

All passages →
Spiritual Ascentpraxis

A staged journey of the soul upward through heavenly realms or levels of being toward the divine source.

The distinction between sense opinion and intellectual knowledge implies a movement upward from lower to higher cognition.

All passages →
Body As Obstacleanthropology

The material body viewed as a prison, tomb, or source of error that hinders spiritual knowledge and return.

[auto] Knowledge concerning objects of sense is dismissed as opinion or surface-knowing compared to authentic intellectual knowledge.

All passages →
Divine Simplicitytheology

The doctrine that God has no parts, divisions, or composite attributes; pure undivided being.

[auto] The Intellectual-Principle is characterized as self-gathered, an Act without want or acquisition, implying undivided nature.

All passages →
Emanation Hierarchycosmology

A chain of divine beings or principles flowing downward from a single transcendent source (the One or the Father), each level less perfect than the one above.

[auto] The passage describes knowledge flowing from the Intellectual-Principle into the reasoning soul, indicating a hierarchical structure of being.

All passages →
Gnosis Direct Knowledgesoteriology

Salvation through direct experiential knowledge of the divine nature, not through faith, ritual, or moral works alone.

[auto] It distinguishes authentic intellectual knowledge from sense opinion, emphasizing direct cognition of the Intellectual-Principle.

All passages →
Kingdom Withinanthropology

The claim that the divine realm is present inside the individual, accessible without external mediation.

[auto] Authentic knowledge enters the reasoning soul from the Intellectual-Principle, making the divine accessible internally.

All passages →
Mystical Unionsoteriology

The merging of the individual soul or self with the divine, transcending personal identity.

[auto] True knowledge is described as being identical to its object, carrying the Intellectual-Principle within itself.

All passages →
Unity Of Beingtheology

The doctrine that all existence is ultimately one substance or one divine reality; non-duality as a theological claim.

[auto] The text refers to the Intellectual-Principle as the 'very Being of the collective total'.

All passages →
Related passages · 8 parallels
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 13, Section 1c
Emily Brontë: “Every existence would exist in Thee.”) And if all things be conceived as being ultimately unified with each other, then all things taken as a whole are One. 507 507 All things possess the same Super-Essence, and that is why…”
Both passages explore the concept of unity as the fundamental principle from which all existence derives. They discuss the relationship between the One and the many, and the nature of the ultimate reality that underlies all things.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 2, Section 1k
Indeed, He is not an unity in this sense, and doth not participate in unity nor possess it; 224 224 These two phrases well express the meaning of the title “Beyond things and supernally infusing Unity” (ὑπερηνωμένη), which I have generally…”
Both passages discuss the nature of unity and multiplicity in relation to a divine principle. Plotinus explores the Intellectual-Principle and its relationship to unity and multiplicity, while the second passage discusses the One God and Its undifferenced unity and differentiation. Both texts grapple with the concept of how a singular divine principle can encompass and produce multiplicity.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 4, Section 1p
let us now yet further resume and compact them all together into the one and concentrated Yearning which is the Father of them all, and let us collect together into two kinds their general desiderative 109 powers, over which the entire mast…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the Intellectual-Principle or the Good as the source of all existence, and the relationship between the formless matter and the higher principles. They explore how multiplicity arises from unity and the role of the Soul in this process.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 7, Section 1b
(2) Wisdom as a whole = Wisdom embodied in the universe as a whole. (3) Wisdom in each individual instance = Wisdom as shown in the structure of some particular plant or animal, or part of a plant or animal. (1) Is an Emanation; (2) and (…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the Intellectual or Divine Principle and its relationship to the material world and multiplicity. They explore the idea of a higher, unified source from which all things emanate, and the distinction between the pure, intelligible realm and the imperfect, material realm.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 1 (part 3)
7.) "I do not wish to divert men from the Word as it is written and taught; but my writings are intended to lead them from a merely historical belief to a living faith, even to Jesus Christ (the Light and Truth) Himself. All preaching and…”
Both passages discuss the nature of true knowledge and its origin from a higher principle. Passage A describes the Intellectual-Principle as the source of authentic knowledge, while Passage B emphasizes the awakening of the spirit within man as the source of real spiritual knowledge.
greek_mystery|Orphic Hymns|Front Matter, p. 4 (part 4)
Hence according to his theology there are two worlds, the intelligible and the sensible. Hence too his three demiurgic principles: Jovial, Dionysiacal, and Adonical, Δΐι#, ( ) Διονυσιακὴ, Αδωναϊκὴ, from whence many orders and differences o…”
Both passages discuss the hierarchical structure of reality, with a emphasis on the role of intellect and soul in the cosmos. They share the idea of a divine intellect that is the source of all motion and life, and a soul that is self-motive and participates in the divine intellect. The passages also highlight the interconnectedness of all things through these divine principles.
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter XVIII (part 3)
In exactly the same way, our separate lives are manifestations of some great rational entity. We find the proof of this in the fact that our lives have no other meaning at all aside from that process of acquiring knowledge performed by us.…”
Both passages explore the relationship between knowledge and various aspects of human experience, emphasizing that all human activities, including emotions and actions, serve the ultimate purpose of acquiring knowledge. They share a mystical perspective on the unity of human experience and its role in a larger rational entity or principle.
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter XXII (part 7)
Now we have established that illogicality (from our standpoint) is the necessary condition of the knowledge of truth or of the real world. This does not mean that everything that is illogical is true and real, but it means absolutely, that…”
Both passages discuss the limitations of ordinary logic and the need for a higher logic or intellectual principle to understand the true nature of reality. They both reference ancient philosophical systems and the idea of a higher, more comprehensive understanding of existence.