← Home
Select Works of Plotinus · 487 of 752 · tr. Thomas Taylor

Select Works, Section 462

Section 9 9. Everything brought into being under some principle not itself is contained either within its maker or, if there is any intermediate, within that: having a prior essential to its being, it needs that prior always, otherwise it would not be contained at all. It is the order of nature: The last in the immediately preceding lasts, things of the order of the Firsts within their prior-firsts, and so thing within thing up to the very pinnacle of source. That Source, having no prior, cannot be contained: uncontained by any of those other forms of being, each held within the series of priors, it is orbed round all, but so as not to be pointed off to hold them part for part; it possesses but is not possessed. Holding all- though itself nowhere held- it is omnipresent, for where its presence failed something would elude its hold. At the same time, in the sense that it is nowhere held, it is not present: thus it is both present and not present; not present as not being circumscribed by anything; yet, as being utterly unattached, not inhibited from presence at any point. That inhibition would mean that the First was determined by some other being; the later series, then, would be without part in the Supreme; God has His limit and is no longer self-governed but mastered by inferiors. While the contained must be where its container is, what is uncontained by place is not debarred from any: for, imagine a place where it is not and evidently some other place retains it; at once it is contained and there is an end of its placelessness. But if the "nowhere" is to stand and the ascription of a "where," implying station in the extern, is to fall, then nothing can be left void; and at once- nothing void, yet no point containing- God is sovereignly present through all. We cannot think of something of God here and something else there, nor of all God gathered at some one spot: there is an instantaneous presence everywhere, nothing containing and nothing left void, everything therefore fully held by the divine. Consider our universe. There is none before it and therefore it is not, itself, in a universe or in any place- what place was there before the universe came to be?- its linked members form and occupy the whole. But Soul is not in the universe, on the contrary the universe is in the Soul; bodily substance is not a place to the Soul; Soul is contained in Intellectual-Principle and is the container of body. The Intellectual-Principle in turn is contained in something else; but that prior principle has nothing in which to be: the First is therefore in nothing, and, therefore, nowhere. But all the rest must be somewhere; and where but in the First? This can mean only that the First is neither remote from things nor directly within them; there is nothing containing it; it contains all. It is The Good to the universe if only in this way, that towards it all things have their being, all dependent upon it, each in its mode, so that thing rises above thing in goodness according to its fuller possession of authentic being.
Themes
Anamnesissoteriology

Platonic recollection: knowledge as the soul's recovery of what it knew before birth, with learning as remembering rather than acquisition.

The Principle 'cannot forget,' implying that knowledge is inherent and recovered rather than acquired from outside.

All passages →
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

The text negates looking for Intellectual objects outside the Principle or treating them as impressions from external reality.

All passages →
Emanation Hierarchycosmology

A chain of divine beings or principles flowing downward from a single transcendent source (the One or the Father), each level less perfect than the one above.

It distinguishes this level of truth from lower knowledge which yields only 'image or vestige'.

All passages →
Living Godtheology

The divine conceived as active, present, and dynamic—not an abstract principle but a personal responsive reality.

The Principle is described as becoming 'living and intellective' rather than static.

All passages →
Self Knowledgesoteriology

The recognition of one's own true divine nature as the primary path to liberation; 'know thyself' as soteriology.

The Principle knows itself as its 'entire self' without needing to search outside.

All passages →
Divine Simplicitytheology

The doctrine that God has no parts, divisions, or composite attributes; pure undivided being.

[auto] The Intellectual-Principle is described as its 'entire self' with nothing outside it, implying non-composite unity.

All passages →
Gnosis Direct Knowledgesoteriology

Salvation through direct experiential knowledge of the divine nature, not through faith, ritual, or moral works alone.

[auto] The passage explicitly contrasts true knowing (identification) with faith and demonstration, emphasizing direct intellectual possession.

All passages →
Mystical Unionsoteriology

The merging of the individual soul or self with the divine, transcending personal identity.

[auto] Knowledge is described as 'identification with the object' involving 'intimate association, absorption'.

All passages →
Opposites Transcendedanthropology

The dissolution of binary oppositions (male/female, inner/outer, above/below) as a mark of spiritual completion.

[auto] The distinction between knower and known is dissolved through 'identification with the object'.

All passages →
Unity Of Beingtheology

The doctrine that all existence is ultimately one substance or one divine reality; non-duality as a theological claim.

[auto] The Ideas are inherent within the Principle rather than existing as separate external entities.

All passages →
Related passages · 9 parallels
buddhism|Vajrakkhedika (Diamond Cutter)|Section 1q
Free from self, free from being, free from life, free from personality, that highest perfect knowledge is always the same, and thus known with all good things. And why? Because, what were preached as good things, good things indeed, O Sub…”
Both passages explore the nature of ultimate reality and knowledge. Plotinus discusses the Intellectual-Principle and its inherent truth, while Subhûti and the Bhagavat discuss the highest perfect knowledge and its nature as non-being. Both traditions emphasize the transcendence of conventional categories and the direct, immediate nature of ultimate knowledge.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 13, Section 1c
Emily Brontë: “Every existence would exist in Thee.”) And if all things be conceived as being ultimately unified with each other, then all things taken as a whole are One. 507 507 All things possess the same Super-Essence, and that is why…”
Both passages discuss the concept of a supreme, uncontained source that encompasses all things. They describe a unity that is both present and not present in a circumscribed sense, and emphasize the dependence of all things on this ultimate principle.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 4, Section 1a
CHAPTER IV Concerning ” Good ,” ” Light ,” ” Beautiful ,” “ Desire ,” ” Ecstasy ,” “ Jealousy .” Also that Evil is neither existent nor Sprung from anything existent nor inherent in existent things . 1. Now let us consider the name of “Go…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine as a transcendent, uncontained source of goodness and existence. They describe how this divine principle extends its influence and presence to all things without being contained by them, emphasizing the omnipresent and unifying nature of the divine.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 2 (part 1)
p. 58 CHAPTER II. THE UNITY OF THE ALL. "We are all one body in Christ, and have all the Spirit of Christ within our reach. If, then, we enter into the Christ, we may see and know everything by the power of His Spirit." ( Forty Question…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine as being uncontained, omnipresent, and the source of all being. They explore the concept of the divine as both present and not present in a physical sense, and emphasize the inability of finite beings to fully comprehend the infinite nature of the divine.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 4 (part 1)
p. 89 CHAPTER IV. CREATION. Everything we see in nature is manifested truth; only we are not able to recognise it as such, unless the truth is manifest within ourselves. God is the supreme, fundamental, universal, self-existent eternal…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine as the ultimate source and container of all things, exploring the relationship between the divine and creation. They share a mystical perspective on the omnipresence and transcendence of the divine, though they come from different traditions.
gnosticism|Gospel of Philip|Section 1m
If we know the truth, we shall find the fruits of the truth within us. If we join it, it will fulfill us. THE STRONG AND WEAK, THE MANIFEST AND HIDDEN Now we have the manifest things of creation. We say, “The strong are they who are held…”
Both passages explore the concept of hidden truth and the means by which it is revealed or known. They emphasize the internal nature of truth and the transformation that occurs when one gains access to it, though they do so within different theological frameworks.
hermeticism|Corpus Hermeticum 5: The Discourse of Hermes to Asclepius|Section 1b
Would that it were possible for thee to get thee wings, and soar into the air, and, poised midway 'tween earth and heaven, behold the earth's solidity, the sea's fluidity (the flowings of its streams), the spaciousness of air, fire's swiftn…”
Both passages discuss the concept of a divine creator or first principle that is responsible for the order and existence of the cosmos. They emphasize the idea that all things are contained within or governed by this divine entity, which is beyond any specific location or containment.
taoism|The Writings of Chuang Tzu (Inner Chapters)|Book 128 (part 1)
p. 236 BOOK VI. PART I. SECTION VI. Tâ Zung Shih, or 'The Great and Most Honoured Master 1 .' 1. He who knows the part which the Heavenly 2 (in him) plays, and knows(also)that which the Human 2 (in him ought to) play, has reached the p…”
Both passages explore the nature of true knowledge and the unity of existence and truth. Plotinus discusses the Intellectual-Principle and its inherent knowledge, while the Taoist text describes the True Man who embodies true knowledge and harmony with the Tao. Both emphasize an innate, self-evident truth that transcends external validation.
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter XXI (part 7)
_______ Where are our "idols?" From what shall we liberate ourselves in order to pass to an understanding of the multi-dimensional world? First of all we must get rid of our assurance that we see and sense that which exists in reality, and…”
Both passages discuss the limitations of human perception and logic in understanding reality. Passage A emphasizes the need to move beyond dualistic logic to comprehend a multi-dimensional world, while Passage B argues for the inherent truth and unity within the Intellectual-Principle, transcending external validation.