← Home
Select Works of Plotinus · 483 of 752 · tr. Thomas Taylor

Select Works, Section 458

Section 5 5. We return to our statement that The First remains intact even when other entities spring from it. In the case of numbers, the unit remains intact while something else produces, and thus number arises in dependence on the unit: much more then does the unit, The One, remain intact in the principle which is before all beings; especially since the entities produced in its likeness, while it thus remains intact, owe their existence to no other, but to its own all-sufficient power. And just as there is, primarily or secondarily, some form or idea from the monad in each of the successive numbers- the later still participating, though unequally, in the unit- so the series of Beings following upon The First bear, each, some form or idea derived from that source. In Number the participation establishes Quantity; in the realm of Being, the trace of The One establishes reality: existence is a trace of The One- our word for entity may probably be connected with that for unity. What we know as Being, the first sequent upon The One, advanced a little outward, so to speak, then chose to go no further, turned inward again and comes to rest and is now the reality and hearth [ousia and hestia] of the universe. Pressing [with the rough breathing] on the word for Being [on] we have the word "hen" [one], an indication that in our very form of speech we tell, as far as may be, that Being [the weaker] is that which proceeds from [the stronger] The One. Thus both the thing that comes to be and Being itself are carriers of a copy, since they are outflows from the power of The primal One: this power sees and in its emotion tries to represent what it sees and breaks into speech "On"; "einai"; "ousia," "hestia" [Existent: Existence: Essence: Hestia or Hearth], sounds which labour to express the essential nature of the universe produced by the travail of the utterer and so to represent, as far as sounds may, the origin of reality.
Themes
Divine Hiddennesstheology

The supreme God's radical concealment beyond ordinary knowledge or perception; the Hidden Father.

By stating the unity transcends the Intellectual-Principle, it suggests a reality concealed beyond even highest intellection.

All passages →
Gnosis Direct Knowledgesoteriology

Salvation through direct experiential knowledge of the divine nature, not through faith, ritual, or moral works alone.

It describes divine knowledge not as sensation of external objects but as identity with the known.

All passages →
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

[auto] The supreme unity is described by negation, defined as transcending Real Being and the Intellectual-Principle.

All passages →
Divine Simplicitytheology

The doctrine that God has no parts, divisions, or composite attributes; pure undivided being.

[auto] The passage contrasts a singular unity above with the multiplicity of things below, implying an undivided nature.

All passages →
Emanation Hierarchycosmology

A chain of divine beings or principles flowing downward from a single transcendent source (the One or the Father), each level less perfect than the one above.

[auto] The text outlines a structure where a transcendent unity exists above the Intellectual-Principle and the multiplicity of all things.

All passages →
Monadcosmology

The absolutely simple, undivided first principle from which all multiplicity and existence flows.

[auto] The 'unity not ranking among those things' functions as the simple first principle from which reality flows.

All passages →
Unity Of Beingtheology

The doctrine that all existence is ultimately one substance or one divine reality; non-duality as a theological claim.

[auto] The passage centrally argues that the Intellectual-Principle is identical with the things it knows, forming a collective unity.

All passages →
Related passages · 9 parallels
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 13, Section 1c
Emily Brontë: “Every existence would exist in Thee.”) And if all things be conceived as being ultimately unified with each other, then all things taken as a whole are One. 507 507 All things possess the same Super-Essence, and that is why…”
Both passages discuss the concept of a singular, ultimate source or unity from which all existence derives. They explore the idea that this unity remains intact while giving rise to multiplicity, and that all things are interconnected through this unity. The passages use similar language and concepts to describe the relationship between the One and the many, indicating a genuine conceptual parallel.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 5, Section 1e
And if these Universals exist by participating in Existence, far more is this true of the things which participate in them. 6. Thus the first gift which the Absolute and Transcendent Goodness bestows is that of mere Existence, and so It d…”
Both passages discuss the concept of a singular, transcendent source from which all existence and reality emanate. They describe the relationship between the One (or Absolute Goodness) and the multiplicity of beings, emphasizing the unity and the process of emanation.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 8, Section 1b
From this Source come the Godlike Powers of the Angelic Orders; from this Source they immutably possess their being and all the ceaseless and immortal motions of their spiritual life; and their very stability and unfailing desire for the Go…”
Both passages discuss the concept of a singular, ultimate source from which all beings and entities derive their existence and essence. They explore the idea of emanation and the hierarchy of being, where the primary source remains intact while giving rise to other entities.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 8, Section 1e
It thus = (1) “equality”; (2) “rightness.” D. maintains that all things possess the latter though not the former. 421 The highest power our minds can conceive is that of the angels. But God has the dominion over them, and hence His power…”
Both passages discuss the concept of a singular, ultimate source from which all things emanate. Passage A describes The One in Plotinus' philosophy, while Passage B discusses the undifferentiated Godhead in a different mystical tradition. Both emphasize the unity and primacy of this source.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 4 (part 1)
p. 89 CHAPTER IV. CREATION. Everything we see in nature is manifested truth; only we are not able to recognise it as such, unless the truth is manifest within ourselves. God is the supreme, fundamental, universal, self-existent eternal…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine and its relationship to creation, exploring the idea of a transcendent unity and the distinction between the divine and the material world. They share a mystical perspective on the nature of reality and the divine.
egyptian|The Egyptian Book of the Dead (Papyrus of Ani)|Chapter 43 (part 70)
He giveth life to man, He breatheth the breath of life into his nostrils--God is father and mother, the father of fathers, and the mother of mothers. He begetteth, but was never begotten; He produceth, but was never produced; He begat hims…”
Both passages discuss the concept of a supreme, transcendent unity or monotheistic deity that exists beyond the material and intellectual realms. Passage A from Plotinus describes a unity that transcends the Intellectual-Principle, while Passage B from the Egyptian context describes a supreme, self-existent God who is one and alone.
hermeticism|Corpus Hermeticum 1: Poimandres|Section 1b
But when He raised His head, I see in Mind the Light, [but] now in Powers no man could number, and Cosmos grown beyond all bounds, and that the Fire was compassed round about by a most mighty Power, and [now] subdued had come unto a stand.…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine and the relationship between the divine mind (Intellectual-Principle in Plotinus, Mind and Logos in the Hermetic text) and the cosmos. They explore the unity and multiplicity of existence, and the role of the divine in the creation and ordering of the universe.
renaissance_hermeticism|The Heroic Enthusiasts, Part I (Gli Eroici Furori)|INTRODUCTIONh
The primal idea of Pythagoras, which Bruno worked out to a more distinct development is this: numbers are the beginning of things; in other words numbers are the cause of the existence of material things; they are not final, but are always…”
Both passages discuss the concept of The One as the ultimate source of all existence and reality. They describe how The One remains intact while giving rise to other entities, and how these entities carry a trace or form derived from The One. The passages also explore the idea of numbers and their relationship to The One and the universe.
taoism|Tao Te Ching|Chapter 25
There was something undefined and complete, coming into existence before Heaven and Earth. How still it was and formless, standing alone, and undergoing no change, reaching everywhere and in no danger (of being exhausted)! It may be regarde…”
Both passages discuss the concept of a transcendent unity or principle that underlies and encompasses all things. Plotinus describes the Intellectual-Principle and a unity that transcends it, while the Taoist passage describes the Tao as the Mother of all things and the ultimate principle from which all things derive their law.