← Home
Select Works of Plotinus · 296 of 752 · tr. Thomas Taylor

Select Works, Section 285 (part 2)

The magnitude present in any mass is definitely one thing, yet its identity from part to part does not imply any such community as would entail common experience; within that identity there is diversity, for it is a condition only, not the actual Essence. The Essence, very near to the impartible, which we assert to belong to the Kind we are now dealing with, is at once an Essence and an entrant into body; upon embodiment, it experiences a partition unknown before it thus bestowed itself. In whatsoever bodies it occupies- even the vastest of all, that in which the entire universe is included- it gives itself to the whole without abdicating its unity. This unity of an Essence is not like that of body, which is a unit by the mode of continuous extension, the mode of distinct parts each occupying its own space. Nor is it such a unity as we have dealt with in the case of quality. The nature, at once divisible and indivisible, which we affirm to be soul has not the unity of an extended thing: it does not consist of separate sections; its divisibility lies in its presence at every point of the recipient, but it is indivisible as dwelling entire in the total and entire in any part. To have penetrated this idea is to know the greatness of the soul and its power, the divinity and wonder of its being, as a nature transcending the sphere of Things. Itself devoid of mass, it is present to all mass: it exists here and yet is There, and this not in distinct phases but with unsundered identity: thus it is "parted and not parted," or, better, it has never known partition, never become a parted thing, but remains a self-gathered integral, and is "parted among bodies" merely in the sense that bodies, in virtue of their own sundered existence, cannot receive it unless in some partitive mode; the partition, in other words, is an occurrence in body not in soul.
Themes
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

The Intellectual-Principle is described as 'repugnant to distinction and to partition,' defining it by what it is not.

All passages →
Divine Sparkscosmology

Fragments of divine light or spirit trapped inside material bodies, awaiting liberation and return to their source.

The passage suggests that while part of the soul enters the body, 'something of it holds its ground,' resembling a fragment remaining connected to the source.

All passages →
Logoscosmology

The divine reason, word, or ordering principle through which the universe was created; mediates between the transcendent God and the material world.

The 'Intellectual-Principle [Divine Mind]' is identified as the noblest content of the Intellectual Kosmos, functioning as a divine ordering principle.

All passages →
Monadcosmology

The absolutely simple, undivided first principle from which all multiplicity and existence flows.

The description of the Intellectual-Principle as 'concentrated all' and 'undivided' reflects the concept of a simple first principle.

All passages →
Soul Migrationcosmology

The transmigration of the soul across lives.

The text states that every soul in the lower sphere has 'come thence' from the Intellectual Kosmos, indicating movement or descent.

All passages →
Body As Obstacleanthropology

The material body viewed as a prison, tomb, or source of error that hinders spiritual knowledge and return.

[auto] The text associates the body with 'bodily division' and 'secession,' implying that embodiment is a departure from the soul's undivided nature.

All passages →
Cosmic Dualismtheology

Ontological opposition between two primal principles (light/darkness, truth/lie, spirit/matter) as the fundamental structure of reality.

[auto] A clear ontological distinction is drawn between the unembodied 'Intellectual Kosmos' and the world of embodied souls subject to division.

All passages →
Divine Simplicitytheology

The doctrine that God has no parts, divisions, or composite attributes; pure undivided being.

[auto] The passage explicitly describes the Intellectual-Principle as a 'concentrated all' with 'nothing of it distinguished or divided,' directly aligning with the doctrine of undivided being.

All passages →
Emanation Hierarchycosmology

A chain of divine beings or principles flowing downward from a single transcendent source (the One or the Father), each level less perfect than the one above.

[auto] The text distinguishes between the 'Intellectual Kosmos' and the 'lower sphere,' noting that souls in the lower world have come from the higher realm.

All passages →
Paradox As Teachingethics

Using apparent contradiction, reversal, or riddle to destabilise ordinary understanding and induce insight.

[auto] The author poses the question of how the soul can be described as indivisible despite undergoing divisional existence through secession.

All passages →
Unity Of Beingtheology

The doctrine that all existence is ultimately one substance or one divine reality; non-duality as a theological claim.

[auto] The passage emphasizes a 'kosmos of unity' where souls are concentrated without spatial discrimination or partition.

All passages →
Related passages · 9 parallels
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 11, Section 1b
Plotinus says the Godhead is indivisibly divided. doth not leave Its own Unity, but, even in the act of going forth to all things, remains entirely within Itself through the excess of that all-transcendent Unity: concerning these things ‘t…”
Both passages discuss the concept of unity and division in a divine or transcendent essence. They explore how this essence can be both indivisible and present in all things without losing its unity, showing a genuine conceptual parallel across different mystical traditions.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 2, Section 1i
The Godhead is not a Whole because it is indivisible, nor a Part because there is nothing, on the ultimate plane, outside It. Yet It is a Whole because It includes the true existence of all things, and is Partitive because It contains the…”
Both passages discuss the nature of a transcendent, indivisible essence that permeates all things while maintaining its unity. Passage A describes the soul's ability to be present in all bodies without losing its indivisibility, while Passage B discusses the Godhead's ability to be a whole and partitive, transcending all forms and beings.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 2, Section 1k
Indeed, He is not an unity in this sense, and doth not participate in unity nor possess it; 224 224 These two phrases well express the meaning of the title “Beyond things and supernally infusing Unity” (ὑπερηνωμένη), which I have generally…”
Both passages discuss the nature of unity and divisibility in a divine or transcendent context. They explore how a singular essence can be present in multiple bodies or entities without losing its unity, reflecting a genuine conceptual parallel across different mystical traditions.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 7, Section 1b
(2) Wisdom as a whole = Wisdom embodied in the universe as a whole. (3) Wisdom in each individual instance = Wisdom as shown in the structure of some particular plant or animal, or part of a plant or animal. (1) Is an Emanation; (2) and (…”
Both passages discuss the nature of a transcendent, indivisible essence (soul or wisdom) that is present in all things without being partitioned or limited by them. They explore the idea of unity and presence in multiplicity, though from different mystical traditions.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 5 (part 9)
1.) "Lucifer having left the harmony of God, the holy name of God separated from him and remained in its own unity; but Lucifer remained in the qualities of the central fire which he had awakened within himself." ( Theosophical Questions ,…”
Both passages discuss the separation of spiritual beings from a higher, unified state. Plotinus describes the division of souls from the Intellectual-Principle, while the Theosophical passages detail Lucifer's separation from the divine harmony. Both explore the themes of unity, division, and the consequences of falling from a higher spiritual state.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 11 (part 6)
90.) "The living Word that dwelt within the eternal virgin attracted to itself the flesh of Mary—that is to say, the essences from the corporeal body of Mary—and thus there grew in nine months a complete human being with soul, spirit, and f…”
Both passages discuss the nature of a higher, divine principle and its relationship with the material world. Plotinus describes the Intellectual-Principle and souls, while the second passage discusses the divine Word and its incarnation in Christ, both exploring the interplay between the divine and the corporeal.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 11 (part 7)
48.) "The soul and the Word are not one or one being. The soul is born from the centre of nature, from the essences, and belongs to the body, for she issues from the essences of the body, and attracts to herself the body; but the Word is f…”
Both passages discuss the relationship between the divine and the soul, emphasizing the soul's connection to both the higher, undivided realm and the lower, divided world. They also explore the idea of the soul maintaining its integral nature while being part of the material world.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 14 (part 2)
2.) During his terrestrial existence man can remain consciously in the three worlds, and by the power of the will with which he is endowed penetrate into either one or the other; but after the separation of the soul from the body has taken…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the soul and its relationship to higher and lower realms. They explore the idea of the soul's existence in different states or principles, and the consequences of its attachment to either divine or earthly realms.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 14 (part 8)
, in the heavenly essentiality (Devachan)—cannot be disturbed by anybody, unless they should wish it themselves, in case that they were very favourably inclined towards some particular soul in harmony with their own. They do not trouble th…”
Both passages discuss the nature of souls and their existence in different realms. Passage A describes the Intellectual Kosmos and the division of souls, while Passage B discusses the states of souls in the afterlife and their connection to the living. Both explore the concept of souls maintaining a connection to a higher realm even after entering a lower, bodily existence.