Select Works of Plotinus · 183 of 752 · tr. Thomas Taylor
Select Works, Section 189
Section 2 2. By derivation from that Authentic Kosmos, one within itself, there subsists this lower kosmos, no longer a true unity. It is multiple, divided into various elements, thing standing apart from thing in a new estrangement. No longer is there concord unbroken; hostility, too, has entered as the result of difference and distance; imperfection has inevitably introduced discord; for a part is not self-sufficient, it must pursue something outside itself for its fulfillment, and so it becomes the enemy to what it needs. This Kosmos of parts has come into being not as the result of a judgement establishing its desirability, but by the sheer necessity of a secondary Kind. The Intellectual Realm was not of a nature to be the ultimate of existents. It was the First and it held great power, all there is of power; this means that it is productive without seeking to produce; for if effort and search were incumbent upon it, the Act would not be its own, would not spring from its essential nature; it would be, like a craftsman, producing by a power not inherent but acquired, mastered by dint of study. The Intellectual Principle, then, in its unperturbed serenity has brought the universe into being, by communicating from its own store to Matter: and this gift is the Reason-Form flowing from it. For the Emanation of the Intellectual Principle is Reason, an emanation unfailing as long as the Intellectual Principle continues to have place among beings. The Reason-Principle within a seed contains all the parts and qualities concentrated in identity; there is no distinction, no jarring, no internal hindering; then there comes a pushing out into bulk, part rises in distinction with part, and at once the members of the organism stand in each other's way and begin to wear each other down. So from this, the One Intellectual Principle, and the Reason-Form emanating from it, our Universe rises and develops part, and inevitably are formed groups concordant and helpful in contrast with groups discordant and combative; sometimes of choice and sometimes incidentally, the parts maltreat each other; engendering proceeds by destruction. Yet: Amid all that they effect and accept, the divine Realm imposes the one harmonious act; each utters its own voice, but all is brought into accord, into an ordered system, for the universal purpose, by the ruling Reason-Principle. This Universe is not Intelligence and Reason, like the Supernal, but participant in Intelligence and Reason: it stands in need of the harmonizing because it is the meeting ground of Necessity and divine Reason-Necessity pulling towards the lower, towards the unreason which is its own characteristic, while yet the Intellectual Principle remains sovereign over it. The Intellectual Sphere [the Divine] alone is Reason, and there can never be another Sphere that is Reason and nothing else; so that, given some other system, it cannot be as noble as that first; it cannot be Reason: yet since such a system cannot be merely Matter, which is the utterly unordered, it must be a mixed thing. Its two extremes are Matter and the Divine Reason; its governing principle is Soul, presiding over the conjunction of the two, and to be thought of not as labouring in the task but as administering serenely by little more than an act of presence.
Related passages · 10 parallels
◆christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 11, Section 1a
“CHAPTER XI Concerning ” Peace “ and what is meant by ” Very Being “ Itself , ” Very Life ,” ” Very Power ,” and similar phrases .
1.
Now let us praise with reverent hymns of peace the Divine Peace which is the Source of all mutual attract…”
Both passages discuss the emanation of a divine principle that brings order and harmony to the universe. They describe a hierarchical structure where a higher, unified realm influences a lower, diverse realm, emphasizing the role of reason or divine peace in maintaining cosmic order.
◆christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 11, Section 1b
“Plotinus says the Godhead is indivisibly divided.
doth not leave Its own Unity, but, even in the act of going forth to all things, remains entirely within Itself through the excess of that all-transcendent Unity: concerning these things ‘t…”
Both passages discuss the concept of unity and emanation from a divine source, with Plotinus describing the Intellectual Principle and its emanation as Reason-Form, while the second passage elaborates on the Godhead's unity and its manifestation in created things. Both emphasize the divine harmony and the interconnectedness of all things.
◆christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 11, Section 1f
“472 Contemplation, Act of Contemplation, and Object Contemplated are all united together, and so imply a fundamental Unity which exists ultimately in God.
473 Cf.
p.
174, n.
3.
474 D.‘s paradox is the paradox of sanity.
We must hold a…”
Both passages discuss the unity and multiplicity of existence, the emanation of creation from a divine source, and the role of harmony and discord in the cosmos. They share a mystical perspective on the relationship between the divine and the created world.
◆christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 13, Section 1f
“Thus in the form “1 x 1” the first figure represents the unity underlying all numbers, the second figure represents unity as a particular number among other numbers.
The first figure may thus be taken as a symbol of the Godhead, the second…”
Both passages discuss the relationship between a transcendent unity (the One or the Godhead) and the multiplicity of the created world. They explore how the divine unity manifests in the diverse and sometimes discordant elements of existence, emphasizing the underlying harmony and the role of an intermediary principle (Intellectual Principle or Soul) in maintaining this order.
◆christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 2, Section 1k
“Indeed, He is not an unity in this sense, and doth not participate in unity nor possess it; 224 224 These two phrases well express the meaning of the title “Beyond things and supernally infusing Unity” (ὑπερηνωμένη), which I have generally…”
Both passages discuss the concept of unity and multiplicity in the context of divine emanation and creation. They explore how a singular divine principle gives rise to a diverse and sometimes discordant universe, while maintaining an underlying harmony and order.
◆christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 4, Section 1
“277 ἑνώσεις, διακρίσεις, ταὐτότητες, ἑτερότητες.
278 Hence parts are united into wholes and wholes articulated into parts, and hence each thing is identical with itself and distinct from everything else.
279 e.g.
Moisture interpenetrates…”
Both passages discuss the concepts of unity and multiplicity within a cosmic framework, exploring how parts relate to wholes and the role of higher principles (angels or the Intellectual Principle) in maintaining harmony. They share a mystical perspective on the interconnectedness of all things and the influence of divine or higher realms on the material world.
◆christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 8, Section 1e
“It thus = (1) “equality”; (2) “rightness.” D.
maintains that all things possess the latter though not the former.
421 The highest power our minds can conceive is that of the angels.
But God has the dominion over them, and hence His power…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine and its relationship to the material world, emphasizing the concept of a higher, unified realm (Intellectual Principle in Plotinus, Godhead in the second passage) and its emanation or interaction with a lower, multiple, and imperfect realm. They also explore the themes of harmony, discord, and the limitations of the material world.
◆hermeticism|Corpus Hermeticum 14: The Discourse of Hermes to Ammon|Section 1b
“Now if the Maker is naught else but That which makes, Alone, Simple, Uncompound, it needs must do this [making] to Itself,—to Which its Maker’s making is “its being made.” 2 And as to all that’s being made,—it cannot be p.
261 [paragraph c…”
Both passages discuss the relationship between a divine creator and the created world, emphasizing the unity and goodness of the creator while explaining the diversity and imperfection of the creation. They both use agricultural metaphors to illustrate the creative process.
◆platonism|Plato: Phaedo|Section 1}
“For I cannot understand how, when separated from the other, each of them was one and not two, and now, when they are brought together, the mere juxtaposition of them can be the cause of their becoming two: nor can I understand how the divis…”
Both passages explore the nature of reality and the role of an organizing principle (mind or reason) in the cosmos. They discuss the generation and destruction of things, the structure of the universe, and the concept of a higher, more perfect realm influencing the lower, imperfect one.
◆western_esoteric|Transcendental Magic I: The Doctrine (Éliphas Lévi)|2. The Pillars Of The Templec
“The undiscerning disciples of Zoroaster divided the duad without referring it to unity, thus separating the Pillars of the Temple and endeavouring to halve God.
Conceive the Absolute as two, and you must immediately conceive it as three to…”
Both passages discuss the duality and unity of divine principles, the tension between opposing forces, and the concept of a higher unity that encompasses and reconciles these dualities. They also explore the idea of a lower, imperfect world that results from this division, and the role of reason or intelligence in mediating these forces.