← Home
Select Works of Plotinus · 152 of 752 · tr. Thomas Taylor

Select Works, Section 161

Section 5 5. Still more unreasonably: There are men, bound to human bodies and subject to desire, grief, anger, who think so generously of their own faculty that they declare themselves in contact with the Intelligible World, but deny that the sun possesses a similar faculty less subject to influence, to disorder, to change; they deny that it is any wiser than we, the late born, hindered by so many cheats on the way towards truth. Their own soul, the soul of the least of mankind, they declare deathless, divine; but the entire heavens and the stars within the heavens have had no communion with the Immortal Principle, though these are far purer and lovelier than their own souls- yet they are not blind to the order, the shapely pattern, the discipline prevailing in the heavens, since they are the loudest in complaint of the disorder that troubles our earth. We are to imagine the deathless Soul choosing of design the less worthy place, and preferring to abandon the nobler to the Soul that is to die. Equally unreasonable is their introduction of that other Soul which they piece together from the elements. How could any form or degree of life come about by a blend of the elements? Their conjunction could produce only a warm or cold or an intermediate substance, something dry or wet or intermediate. Besides, how could such a soul be a bond holding the four elements together when it is a later thing and rises from them? And this element- soul is described as possessing consciousness and will and the rest- what can we think? Furthermore, these teachers, in their contempt for this creation and this earth, proclaim that another earth has been made for them into which they are to enter when they depart. Now this new earth is the Reason-Form [the Logos] of our world. Why should they desire to live in the archetype of a world abhorrent to them? Then again, what is the origin of that pattern world? It would appear, from the theory, that the Maker had already declined towards the things of this sphere before that pattern came into being. Now let us suppose the Maker craving to construct such an Intermediate World- though what motive could He have?- in addition to the Intellectual world which He eternally possesses. If He made the mid-world first, what end was it to serve? To be a dwelling-place for Souls? How then did they ever fall from it? It exists in vain. If He made it later than this world- abstracting the formal-idea of this world and leaving the Matter out- the Souls that have come to know that intermediate sphere would have experienced enough to keep them from entering this. If the meaning is simply that Souls exhibit the Ideal-Form of the Universe, what is there distinctive in the teaching?
Themes
Correspondencecosmology

The Hermetic axiom that the structure of the cosmos is reflected at every scale — 'as above, so below; as within, so without' — making each level a legible map of the others.

The text suggests that lower types are engendered only as secondary reflections of the higher principles.

All passages →
Cosmic Sympathycosmology

The Stoic and Plotinian doctrine that all parts of the cosmos are bound by hidden affinities, so that a movement in one part resonates through the whole; the metaphysical basis for astrology, magic, and divination.

The description of all things being linked in an unbroken chain implies a metaphysical connection between parts of the cosmos.

All passages →
Divine Providencetheology

Pronoia — the doctrine that the divine actively orders the unfolding of the cosmos and human affairs toward intelligible ends, against pure chance or blind necessity.

The All-Soul is described as actively sustaining and fostering the series of later Being through its light.

All passages →
Logoscosmology

The divine reason, word, or ordering principle through which the universe was created; mediates between the transcendent God and the material world.

The 'Intellectual-Principle' is mentioned as a mediating level between the Good and Soul, functioning similarly to the Logos.

All passages →
Divine Lighttheology

The uncreated luminous quality of the divine, sometimes experienced directly in mystical states; illumination as revelation.

[auto] The text repeatedly uses light imagery such as 'Ever illuminated,' 'light unfailing,' and 'central fire' to describe the transmission of divine power.

All passages →
Emanation Hierarchycosmology

A chain of divine beings or principles flowing downward from a single transcendent source (the One or the Father), each level less perfect than the one above.

[auto] The passage explicitly describes a chain of being flowing from the Good through the Intellectual-Principle and Soul to later Being.

All passages →
Monadcosmology

The absolutely simple, undivided first principle from which all multiplicity and existence flows.

[auto] References to 'The Good' and 'Primal Life' as the singular source from which all else flows align with the concept of a first principle.

All passages →
Paradox As Teachingethics

Using apparent contradiction, reversal, or riddle to destabilise ordinary understanding and induce insight.

[auto] The statement that generated things 'have never known a beginning' presents a paradoxical view of eternity and generation.

All passages →
Unity Of Beingtheology

The doctrine that all existence is ultimately one substance or one divine reality; non-duality as a theological claim.

[auto] The text states all things are 'linked in one unbroken chain' and each gives of its being to another, implying ontological unity.

All passages →
Related passages · 4 parallels
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 1 (part 3)
7.) "I do not wish to divert men from the Word as it is written and taught; but my writings are intended to lead them from a merely historical belief to a living faith, even to Jesus Christ (the Light and Truth) Himself. All preaching and…”
Both passages explore the concept of the divine within the human soul and the nature of spiritual knowledge. Boehme emphasizes the divine spark within man and the awakening of the spirit, while Plotinus discusses the soul's connection to the Intelligible World and the divine nature of the soul.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 6 (part 5)
But when this took place the love in the light of God broke through that heaven of division and ignited the heat." ( Aurora , xxv. 68.) "God, the eternal light and the eternal will, shines within the darkness, and the darkness has captured…”
Both passages discuss the concept of divine light and its role in sustaining and illuminating the universe. They describe a hierarchical structure of being, where the divine principle emanates light and life to lower levels of existence, though they use different metaphors and frameworks.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 6 (part 8)
They are fire-flames, illumined by the light of God, but we attain the great fountain of meekness and love which is welling up within the holy essentiality of God." 1 ( Menschwerdung , i. 5.) Man comprises all three principles: the princip…”
Both passages discuss the tripartite nature of existence and the interconnectedness of all things. Boehme's passage describes the three principles within man and the world, while Plotinus' passage discusses the All-Soul and the communication of being among all things, highlighting the interconnectedness and eternal nature of existence.
hermeticism|Corpus Hermeticum 9: The Decalogue|Section 1b
But I return once more to the Discourse (Logos) on Sense. That sense doth share with thought in man, doth constitute him man. But 'tis not [every] man, as I have said, who benefits by thought; for this man is material, that other one subs…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine, the cosmos, and the human soul, exploring the relationship between the material and the spiritual. They share a focus on the role of sense and thought, and the idea of a divine order or logos.