← Home
Select Works of Plotinus · 135 of 752 · tr. Thomas Taylor

Select Works, Section 143

Section 4 4. Now, in general anything that has a potentiality is actually something else, and this potentiality of the future mode of being is an existing mode. But what we think of as Matter, what we assert to be the potentiality of all things, cannot be said to be actually any one being among beings: if it were of itself any definite being, it could not be potentially all. If, then, it is not among existences, it must necessarily be without existence. How, therefore, can it be actually anything? The answer is that while Matter can not be any of the things which are founded upon it, it may quite well be something else, admitting that all existences are not rooted in Matter. But once more, if it is excluded from the entities founded upon it and all these are Beings, it must itself be a Non-Being. It is, further, by definition, formless and therefore not an Idea: it cannot then be classed among things of the Intellectual Realm, and so is, once more, a Non-Being. Falling, as regards both worlds, under Non-Being, it is all the more decidedly the Non-Being. It has eluded the Nature of the Authentic Existences; it has even failed to come up with the things to which a spurious existence can be attributed- for it is not even a phantasm of Reason as these are- how is it possible to include it under any mode of Being? And if it falls under no mode of Being, what can it actually be?
Related passages · 2 parallels
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 2, Section 1i
The Godhead is not a Whole because it is indivisible, nor a Part because there is nothing, on the ultimate plane, outside It. Yet It is a Whole because It includes the true existence of all things, and is Partitive because It contains the…”
Both passages explore the nature of ultimate reality, with Plotinus discussing the concept of Matter as Non-Being and the Godhead in the second passage being described as beyond Being and Form. Both texts delve into the transcendence of their respective subjects, highlighting the difficulty of defining ultimate reality within conventional categories.
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter XXII (part 5)
______ Whatever we may think of this philosophy, we cannot deny its metaphysical boldness and its logical consistency. If Brahman is all in all, the One without a second, nothing can be said to exist that is not Brahman . there is no room…”
Both passages explore the nature of ultimate reality and the distinction between true being and apparent being. Plotinus discusses the concept of Matter as Non-Being, while the Vedanta passage emphasizes Brahman as the only true reality, with the phenomenal world being an illusion.