Select Works of Plotinus · 134 of 752 · tr. Thomas Taylor
Select Works, Section 142
Section 3 3. We come now to the purpose of all this discussion; to make clear in what sense or to what degree Actualization is predicable in the Intellectual Realm and whether all is in Actualization there, each and every member of that realm being an Act, or whether Potentiality also has place there. Now: if there is no Matter there to harbour potentiality: if nothing there has any future apart from its actual mode: if nothing there generates, whether by changes or in the permanence of its identity; if nothing goes outside of itself to give being to what is other than itself; then, potentiality has no place there: the Beings there possess actuality as belonging to eternity, not to time. Those, however, who assert Matter in the Intellectual Realm will be asked whether the existence of that Matter does not imply the potential there too; for even if Matter there exists in another mode than here, every Being there will have its Matter, its form and the union of the two [and therefore the potential, separable from the actual]. What answer is to be made? Simply, that even the Matter there is Idea, just as the Soul, an Idea, is Matter to another [a higher] Being. But relatively to that higher, the Soul is a potentiality? No: for the Idea [to which it is Matter] is integral to the Soul and does not look to a future; the distinction between the Soul and its Idea is purely mental: the Idea and the Matter it includes are conceived as a conjunction but are essentially one Kind: remember that Aristotle makes his Fifth Body immaterial. But surely Potentiality exists in the Soul? Surely the Soul is potentially the living-being of this world before it has become so? Is it not potentially musical, and everything else that it has not been and becomes? Does not this imply potentiality even in the Intellectual Existences? No: the Soul is not potentially these things; it is a Power towards them. But after what mode does Actualization exist in the Intellectual Realm? Is it the Actualization of a statue, where the combination is realized because the Form-Idea has mastered each separate constituent of the total? No: it is that every constituent there is a Form-Idea and, thus, is perfect in its Being. There is in the Intellectual Principle no progression from some power capable of intellection to the Actuality of intellection: such a progression would send us in search of a Prior Principle not progressing from Power to Act; there all stands ever realized. Potentiality requires an intervention from outside itself to bring it to the actualization which otherwise cannot be; but what possesses, of itself, identity unchangeable for ever is an actualization: all the Firsts then are actualizations, simply because eternally and of themselves they possess all that is necessary to their completion. This applies equally to the Soul, not to that in Matter but to that in the Intellectual Sphere; and even that in Matter, the Soul of Growth, is an actualization in its difference; it possesses actually [and not, like material things, merely in image] the Being that belongs to it. Then, everything, in the intellectual is in actualization and so all There is Actuality? Why not? If that Nature is rightly said to be "Sleepless," and to be Life and the noblest mode of Life, the noblest Activities must be there; all then is actualization there, everything is an Actuality, for everything is a Life, and all Place there is the Place of Life, in the true sense the ground and spring of Soul and of the Intellectual Principle.
Themes
◆Divine Simplicitytheology
The doctrine that God has no parts, divisions, or composite attributes; pure undivided being.
The text inquires whether Actuality is distinct from being-in-act, probing the undivided nature of divine existence.
All passages →◆Emanation Hierarchycosmology
A chain of divine beings or principles flowing downward from a single transcendent source (the One or the Father), each level less perfect than the one above.
The passage distinguishes between the Intellectual Realm and the Realm of Sense, implying a hierarchical structure of existence.
All passages →Related passages · 6 parallels
◆christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 13, Section 1c
“Emily Brontë: “Every existence would exist in Thee.”) And if all things be conceived as being ultimately unified with each other, then all things taken as a whole are One.
507 507 All things possess the same Super-Essence, and that is why…”
Both passages discuss the nature of reality and the concept of unity and actualization in a metaphysical sense. Passage A from Plotinus explores the idea of actualization and the lack of potentiality in the Intellectual Realm, while Passage B from a mystical Christian text discusses the unity and super-essence of all things in God. Both texts emphasize the eternal and unchanging nature of the highest reality.
◆christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 2, Section 1i
“The Godhead is not a Whole because it is indivisible, nor a Part because there is nothing, on the ultimate plane, outside It.
Yet It is a Whole because It includes the true existence of all things, and is Partitive because It contains the…”
Both passages discuss the nature of reality and existence in their respective mystical traditions. Passage A from Plotinus explores the concept of actualization and potentiality in the Intellectual Realm, emphasizing the eternal and unchangeable nature of beings there. Passage B from the Christian mystical tradition discusses the Godhead as a transcendent, formless, and super-essential being that pervades all existence. Both passages deal with the idea of a higher, unchanging reality that is beyond the material world.
◆christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 4, Section 1a
“CHAPTER IV Concerning ” Good ,” ” Light ,” ” Beautiful ,” “ Desire ,” ” Ecstasy ,” “ Jealousy .” Also that Evil is neither existent nor Sprung from anything existent nor inherent in existent things .
1.
Now let us consider the name of “Go…”
Both passages discuss the nature of reality in the intellectual or divine realm, emphasizing actualization and the inherent goodness and perfection of beings in these realms. They share a focus on the eternal, unchangeable nature of these higher realities.
◆christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 8, Section 1a
“CHAPTER VIII Concerning ” Power ,” ” Righteousness ,” ” Salvation ,” ” Redemption “; and also concerning ” Inequality .” 1.
Now since the Sacred Writers speak of the Divine Truthfulness and Supra-Sapient Wisdom as Power, and as Righteousne…”
Both passages explore the concept of actualization and power within their respective mystical traditions. Passage A discusses actualization in the Intellectual Realm, emphasizing that all beings there are in a state of eternal actuality. Passage B describes God's power as undifferentiated and potential, transcending all other forms of power. Both texts delve into the nature of existence and the inherent power or actuality within their respective realms.
◆platonism|Plato: Timaeus|Section 1h
“First then, in my judgment, we must make a distinction and ask, What is that which always is and has no becoming; and what is that which is always becoming and never is?
That which is apprehended by intelligence and reason is always in the…”
Both passages explore the nature of reality and the distinction between the eternal, unchanging realm of forms or ideas and the mutable, physical world. They both emphasize the role of an eternal, unchanging principle as the source of perfection and actuality.
◆western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter II (part 5)
“But if I should prove that a house, i.e., a physical fact, may exist, it does not at all mean that it exists really.
If I prove that a man may own the house it is no proof that he owns it.
Our relation to an idea and to a house are quite…”
Both passages explore the distinction between different types of existence, with Passage A discussing the existence of ideas versus physical objects and Passage B distinguishing between actuality and potentiality. Both texts delve into metaphysical concepts and the nature of reality, showing a conceptual parallel in their exploration of existence and essence.