← Home
Select Works of Plotinus · 119 of 752 · tr. Thomas Taylor

Select Works, Section 126

Section 4 4. The present existence of the Ideal-Forms has been demonstrated elsewhere: we take up our argument from that point. If, then, there is more than one of such forming Ideas, there must of necessity be some character common to all and equally some peculiar character in each keeping them distinct. This peculiar characteristic, this distinguishing difference, is the individual shape. But if shape, then there is the shaped, that in which the difference is lodged. There is, therefore, a Matter accepting the shape, a permanent substratum. Further, admitting that there is an Intelligible Realm beyond, of which this world is an image, then, since this world-compound is based on Matter, there must be Matter there also. And how can you predicate an ordered system without thinking of form, and how think of form apart from the notion of something in which the form is lodged? No doubt that Realm is, in the strict fact, utterly without parts, but in some sense there is part there too. And in so far as these parts are really separate from each other, any such division and difference can be no other than a condition of Matter, of a something divided and differentiated: in so far as that realm, though without parts, yet consists of a variety of entities, these diverse entities, residing in a unity of which they are variations, reside in a Matter; for this unity, since it is also a diversity, must be conceived of as varied and multiform; it must have been shapeless before it took the form in which variation occurs. For if we abstract from the Intellectual-Principle the variety and the particular shapes, the Reason-Principles and the Thoughts, what precedes these was something shapeless and undetermined, nothing of what is actually present there.
Themes
Body As Obstacleanthropology

The material body viewed as a prison, tomb, or source of error that hinders spiritual knowledge and return.

Body is excluded from the Supreme and associated with 'shifting nature', implying it is inferior to the primal state.

All passages →
Evil As Privationtheology

Augustinian and Plotinian doctrine that evil has no positive being of its own but is a lack, distortion, or absence of the good — denying ontological dualism while preserving moral seriousness.

Matter is described as 'undetermined' and 'void of shape,' aligning with the Plotinian view of matter as a lack or privation of form.

All passages →
Logoscosmology

The divine reason, word, or ordering principle through which the universe was created; mediates between the transcendent God and the material world.

The 'Idea' entering Matter to constitute a body functions as an ordering principle mediating form and substance.

All passages →
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

[auto] The nature of the Highest is defined by negation, stating there is 'nothing that lacks determination' and 'no Matter there'.

All passages →
Cosmic Dualismtheology

Ontological opposition between two primal principles (light/darkness, truth/lie, spirit/matter) as the fundamental structure of reality.

[auto] A clear ontological opposition is drawn between the determined Highest sphere and the undetermined realm of Matter.

All passages →
Divine Simplicitytheology

The doctrine that God has no parts, divisions, or composite attributes; pure undivided being.

[auto] The passage centrally argues that the Highest order is 'simplex' and lacks the compound nature of Matter.

All passages →
Emanation Hierarchycosmology

A chain of divine beings or principles flowing downward from a single transcendent source (the One or the Father), each level less perfect than the one above.

[auto] The passage distinguishes between the 'primal' and things of 'derived existence', implying a hierarchical flow of being.

All passages →
Monadcosmology

The absolutely simple, undivided first principle from which all multiplicity and existence flows.

[auto] The text refers to the 'Primal-Principles' and 'Firsts' as simplex and undivided sources of existence.

All passages →
Related passages · 4 parallels
hermeticism|Corpus Hermeticum 1: Poimandres|Section 1b
But when He raised His head, I see in Mind the Light, [but] now in Powers no man could number, and Cosmos grown beyond all bounds, and that the Fire was compassed round about by a most mighty Power, and [now] subdued had come unto a stand.…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine and the creation of the cosmos, with a focus on the role of Mind (Nous) and the Logos. They explore the relationship between the divine principles and the material world, though from different philosophical and mystical perspectives.
platonism|Plato: Timaeus|Section 1y
He, however, who raises the question whether they are to be truly regarded as one or five, takes up a more reasonable position. Arguing from probabilities, I am of opinion that they are one; another, regarding the question from another poi…”
Both passages explore the nature of form and matter, discussing how different forms or elements interact and transform. They share a philosophical inquiry into the underlying principles of reality, though they come from different traditions.
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter V (part 2)
Form pertains to all things . We say that everything consists of matter and form . Under the category of "matter," as already stated, the cause of a lengthy series of mixed sensations is predicated, but matter without form is not comprehe…”
Both passages discuss the relationship between form and matter, exploring the idea of a substratum or underlying reality that supports the forms we perceive. They both delve into the nature of reality and the role of form in the structure of existence, though from different philosophical and mystical traditions.
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter XXIII (part 16)
329 cases it is more correct to regard them all as the highest types in their own evolution. The absence of intermediate forms makes this view much more probable than that which is usually accepted, and which gives such rich material for d…”
Both passages explore the nature of consciousness and reality, proposing different forms or states of existence. Ouspensky's passage outlines different forms of consciousness and their evolution, while Plotinus' passage discusses the nature of the Ideal-Forms and the substratum that accepts these forms. Both delve into metaphysical and evolutionary concepts, showing a genuine conceptual parallel.