← Home
Select Works of Plotinus · 33 of 752 · tr. Thomas Taylor

Select Works, Section 38

Section 5 5. But what of sorrows, illnesses and all else that inhibit the native activity? What of the suspension of consciousness which drugs or disease may bring about? Could either welfare or happiness be present under such conditions? And this is to say nothing of misery and disgrace, which will certainly be urged against us, with undoubtedly also those never-failing "Miseries of Priam." "The Sage," we shall be told, "may bear such afflictions and even take them lightly but they could never be his choice, and the happy life must be one that would be chosen. The Sage, that is, cannot be thought of as simply a sage soul, no count being taken of the bodily-principle in the total of the being: he will, no doubt, take all bravely... until the body's appeals come up before him, and longings and loathings penetrate through the body to the inner man. And since pleasure must be counted in towards the happy life, how can one that, thus, knows the misery of ill-fortune or pain be happy, however sage he be? Such a state, of bliss self-contained, is for the Gods; men, because of the less noble part subjoined in them, must needs seek happiness throughout all their being and not merely in some one part; if the one constituent be troubled, the other, answering to its associate's distress, must perforce suffer hindrance in its own activity. There is nothing but to cut away the body or the body's sensitive life and so secure that self-contained unity essential to happiness."
Themes
Detachment Gelassenheitpraxis

Eckhart's Abgeschiedenheit/Gelassenheit — radical letting-go of will, image, and grasping that opens the soul to God; distinct from inner_silence (quietness) and from material renunciation, and adjacent to Sufi tark and Buddhist non-grasping as a practice rather than a metaphysical claim.

The instruction to 'cut away the body or the body's sensitive life' aligns with the practice of radical detachment from material hindrances.

All passages →
Evil As Privationtheology

Augustinian and Plotinian doctrine that evil has no positive being of its own but is a lack, distortion, or absence of the good — denying ontological dualism while preserving moral seriousness.

Suffering and misery are described as inhibiting 'native activity,' consistent with the view of evil as a hindrance or lack of proper function.

All passages →
Mystical Unionsoteriology

The merging of the individual soul or self with the divine, transcending personal identity.

The text describes a state of 'bliss self-contained' belonging to the Gods which humans seek to attain through unity.

All passages →
Return To Sourcesoteriology

The soul's journey back to its divine origin, reversing the fall into matter through stages of purification or illumination.

The proposed solution to cut away the body's influence implies a purification process to return to the divine state of self-contained unity.

All passages →
Separation From Sourcesoteriology

The felt condition of exile from one's divine origin — Rumi's reed flute torn from its bed, Plotinus's 'we have forgotten,' the Gnostic forgetfulness; the affective wound that complements return_to_source and gives the return its motive.

The passage describes how the 'less noble part' (body) subjoined to men hinders their activity and prevents the self-contained unity found in Gods.

All passages →
Tripartite Soulanthropology

Division of the human being into three principles: spirit (pneuma), soul (psyche), and body/matter (hyle or soma).

The text distinguishes between the 'sage soul,' the 'bodily-principle,' and the 'inner man,' reflecting a division of human principles.

All passages →
Unity Of Beingtheology

The doctrine that all existence is ultimately one substance or one divine reality; non-duality as a theological claim.

The text identifies 'self-contained unity' as the essential condition for happiness, echoing the metaphysical goal of returning to the One.

All passages →
Body As Obstacleanthropology

The material body viewed as a prison, tomb, or source of error that hinders spiritual knowledge and return.

[auto] The passage centrally argues that the body and its affections (illness, pain, longings) inhibit the soul's native activity and prevent true happiness.

All passages →
Divine Simplicitytheology

The doctrine that God has no parts, divisions, or composite attributes; pure undivided being.

[auto] The text contrasts the 'self-contained' bliss of the Gods with the composite nature of men who have a 'less noble part subjoined'.

All passages →
Related passages · 7 parallels
buddhism|The Dhammapada|Chapter XVI, Section 1
p. 56 CHAPTER XVI. PLEASURE. 209. He who gives himself to vanity, and does not give himself to meditation, forgetting the real aim (of life) and grasping at pleasure, will in time envy him who has exerted himself in meditation. 210. Let no…”
Both passages discuss the relationship between the body, pleasure, and the attainment of a higher state of being or happiness. They both emphasize the need to transcend bodily concerns and pleasures to achieve a state of bliss or enlightenment.
greek_mystery|The Golden Verses of Pythagoras|Section 5 (part 3)
"Thou shalt not hope what thou ought'st not to hope," knowing the nature of all things, and what is possible. 55. The Gods near at hand are virtue and truth. p. 17 59, 60. The fatal strife is caused by our inclination "madly to run cou…”
Both passages discuss the relationship between the soul and the body, and the pursuit of happiness or freedom from suffering. They emphasize the need to transcend bodily concerns to achieve a higher state of being, though they use different terminology and cultural contexts.
hermeticism|Corpus Hermeticum 8: The Eight Sphere|Section 1b
Now the third life - Man, after the image of the Cosmos made, [and] having mind, after the Father's will, beyond all earthly lives - not only doth have feeling with the second God <i.e., the Cosmos>, but also hath conception of the first; f…”
Both passages discuss the relationship between the soul and the body, and the pursuit of a higher, more divine state of existence. They both emphasize the idea of transcending bodily limitations to achieve a state of happiness or unity, though they come from different mystical traditions.
hermeticism|Corpus Hermeticum 10: The Sermon on the Mount|Section 1c
For that the soul who hath no knowledge of the things that are, or knowledge of their nature, or of Good, is blinded by the body's passions and tossed about. This wretched soul, not knowing what she is, becomes the slave of bodies of stran…”
Both passages discuss the relationship between the soul and the body, and the pursuit of happiness or virtue. They explore the idea that the body can hinder the soul's native activity and that true happiness or virtue is achieved through a separation from or transcendence of the bodily concerns.
hermeticism|Corpus Hermeticum 10: The Sermon on the Mount|Section 1d
Spirit pervading [body] by means of veins and arteries and blood, bestows upon the living creature motion, and as it were doth bear it in a way. For this cause some do think the soul is blood, in that they do mistake its nature, not knowin…”
Both passages discuss the relationship between the soul, the body, and the divine. They explore the idea that the body can hinder the soul's connection to the divine or higher self, and that the soul's true happiness or goodness is found in transcending the bodily constraints.
hermeticism|Corpus Hermeticum 12: The Prayer|Section 1b
But for the moment, [Tat,] let be the teaching as to vice and Fate, for we have spoken of these things in other [of our sermons]; but now our teaching (logos) is about the Mind: - what Mind can do, and how it is [so] different - in men bein…”
Both passages explore the relationship between the mind/soul and the body, and the impact of external circumstances on inner happiness or suffering. They discuss the idea of the sage or mind-led individual who can transcend bodily afflictions to achieve a state of inner bliss or freedom from vice.
platonism|Plato: Timaeus|Section 1Ž
For a man who is in great joy or in great pain, in his unseasonable eagerness to attain the one and to avoid the other, is not able to see or to hear anything rightly; but he is mad, and is at the time utterly incapable of any participation…”
Both passages discuss the relationship between the soul and the body, particularly how bodily afflictions can affect the soul's happiness and rationality. They both explore the idea that the body can hinder the soul's well-being and that the ideal state is one where the soul is not burdened by the body.