← Home
Iamblichus: On the Mysteries · 136 of 218 · tr. Thomas Taylor

Chapter I

Leaving, therefore, these particulars, you wish in the next place that I would unfold to you “ What the Egyptians conceive the first cause to be; whether intellect, or above intellect; whether alone, or subsisting with some other or others; whether incorporeal, of corporeal; and whether it is the same with the Demiurgus, or is prior to the Demiurgus? Likewise, whether all things are from one principle, or from many principles; whether they have a knowledge of matter, or of primary corporeal qualities; and whether they admit matter to be unbegotten, or to be generated? ” I, therefore, will in the first place relate to you the cause why in the books of the ancient writers of sacred concerns many and various opinions concerning these things are circulated, and also why among those that are still living, and are renowned for their wisdom, the opinion on this subject is not simple and one. I say then, that as there are 300 many essences, and these differing from each other, the all-various multitude of the principles of these, and which have different orders, were delivered by different ancient priests. As Seleucus [130] narrates, therefore, Hermes described the principles that rank as wholes in two myriads [131] of books; or, as we are informed by Manetho [132] , he perfectly unfolded these principles in three myriads six thousand five hundred and twenty five volumes. But different ancient writers differently explained the partial principles of essences. It is necessary, however, by investigation to discover the truth about all these principles, and concisely to unfold it to you as much as possible. And, in the first place, hear concerning that which is the first subject of your inquiry. 301
Themes
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

The inquiry explicitly asks whether the first cause is intellect or above intellect, suggesting a limitation of positive categories to describe the divine.

All passages →
Cosmic Dualismtheology

Ontological opposition between two primal principles (light/darkness, truth/lie, spirit/matter) as the fundamental structure of reality.

The text questions whether all things are from one principle or many principles, implying an ontological distinction between unity and multiplicity.

All passages →
Demiurgecosmology

A secondary creator deity—often ignorant or malevolent—responsible for fashioning the material world, distinct from the supreme transcendent God.

The passage directly asks whether the first cause is the same as the Demiurgus or prior to it, highlighting a key theological distinction.

All passages →
Divine Hiddennesstheology

The supreme God's radical concealment beyond ordinary knowledge or perception; the Hidden Father.

The inquiry into whether the first cause is intellect or above intellect implies a radical concealment beyond ordinary categorization.

All passages →
Emanation Hierarchycosmology

A chain of divine beings or principles flowing downward from a single transcendent source (the One or the Father), each level less perfect than the one above.

The mention of principles that have different orders suggests a structured hierarchy of divine or cosmic entities.

All passages →
Gnosis Direct Knowledgesoteriology

Salvation through direct experiential knowledge of the divine nature, not through faith, ritual, or moral works alone.

The text emphasizes the necessity of investigation to discover the truth about principles, aligning with the goal of direct experiential knowledge.

All passages →
Hidden Sayingssoteriology

Esoteric teachings reserved for those ready to receive them; outer meaning conceals an inner liberating truth.

The passage notes that many opinions are circulated among ancient writers regarding these esoteric subjects.

All passages →
Monadcosmology

The absolutely simple, undivided first principle from which all multiplicity and existence flows.

The inquiry focuses on the 'first cause' and whether all things are from one principle, reflecting the search for a singular first source.

All passages →
Unity Of Beingtheology

The doctrine that all existence is ultimately one substance or one divine reality; non-duality as a theological claim.

The inquiry into whether all things are from one principle suggests a theological commitment to the doctrine of ontological unity.

All passages →
Related passages · 3 parallels
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 5, Section 1g
as an Unity, produce the essences of things: laws which are called in Divine Science 141 “Preordinations” or Divine and beneficent Volitions, laws which ordain things and create them, laws whereby the Super-Essential preordained and brought…”
Both passages discuss the concept of a first cause or divine principle that governs the creation and existence of all things. They explore the nature of this principle and its relationship to the manifest world, showing a genuine conceptual parallel in their mystical traditions.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 7, Section 1b
(2) Wisdom as a whole = Wisdom embodied in the universe as a whole. (3) Wisdom in each individual instance = Wisdom as shown in the structure of some particular plant or animal, or part of a plant or animal. (1) Is an Emanation; (2) and (…”
Both passages explore the nature of the first cause or divine wisdom, discussing its relationship to intellect, creation, and the structure of reality. They share a mystical approach to understanding the divine, though they come from different traditions.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 6 (part 8)
They are fire-flames, illumined by the light of God, but we attain the great fountain of meekness and love which is welling up within the holy essentiality of God." 1 ( Menschwerdung , i. 5.) Man comprises all three principles: the princip…”
Both passages discuss the nature of fundamental principles or causes in their respective traditions. Iamblichus explores the Egyptian conception of multiple principles and their origins, while the second passage outlines the three principles in man according to a different mystical tradition. Both texts delve into the hierarchical and constitutive aspects of these principles.