← Home
Iamblichus: On the Mysteries · 94 of 218 · tr. Thomas Taylor

Chapter XIII

Consider, therefore, also another genus of causes; how a stone or a herb frequently possess from themselves a nature corruptive, or again collective of generated natures. For this is not only the case with these, but this physical power is also in greater natures and greater things, which those who are not able to infer by a reasoning process, will perhaps transfer the works and energies of nature to more excellent beings [ i. e. to Gods, angels, and dæmons]. Now, therefore, it is acknowledged that the tribe of evil dæmons has a very extended 224 power in generation, in human affairs, and in such things as subsist about the earth. Hence, why is it wonderful that a tribe of this kind should effect such works as these? For every man is not able to distinguish a good from an evil dæmon, or by what peculiarities the one is separated from the other. Hence those, who are not able to perceive the difference between the two, absurdly reason concerning the cause of them, and refer this cause to genera superior to nature and the dæmoniacal order. If, also, certain powers of a partial soul are assumed in order to effect these things, whether such a soul is detained in body, or has left the testaceous and terrestrial body, but wanders about the places of generation in a turbid and humid spirit; this, indeed, will be a true opinion, but separates the cause of these things at the greatest distance from more excellent natures. By no means, therefore, is that which is divine, or any good dæmon, subservient to the illegal desires of men in venereal concerns. For of these things there are many other causes. 225 SECTION V.
Themes
Body As Obstacleanthropology

The material body viewed as a prison, tomb, or source of error that hinders spiritual knowledge and return.

The text describes a 'testaceous and terrestrial body' that detains the soul and separates it from more excellent natures.

All passages →
Cosmic Dualismtheology

Ontological opposition between two primal principles (light/darkness, truth/lie, spirit/matter) as the fundamental structure of reality.

The passage explicitly distinguishes between good and evil dæmons as opposing powers in human affairs.

All passages →
Divine Hiddennesstheology

The supreme God's radical concealment beyond ordinary knowledge or perception; the Hidden Father.

The text notes that the divine is not subservient to human desires and remains hidden from ordinary perception.

All passages →
Evil As Privationtheology

Augustinian and Plotinian doctrine that evil has no positive being of its own but is a lack, distortion, or absence of the good — denying ontological dualism while preserving moral seriousness.

The passage argues that evil dæmons are not good beings but powers that effect corruptive works without divine subservience.

All passages →
Gnosis Direct Knowledgesoteriology

Salvation through direct experiential knowledge of the divine nature, not through faith, ritual, or moral works alone.

The text emphasizes the necessity of distinguishing between good and evil dæmons through reasoning to avoid absurd conclusions.

All passages →
Hidden Sayingssoteriology

Esoteric teachings reserved for those ready to receive them; outer meaning conceals an inner liberating truth.

The passage warns that those unable to perceive the difference between good and evil dæmons will refer causes to superior beings based on ignorance.

All passages →
Living Godtheology

The divine conceived as active, present, and dynamic—not an abstract principle but a personal responsive reality.

The text implies divine activity through the mention of Gods, angels, and dæmons as active agents in generation.

All passages →
Paradox As Teachingethics

Using apparent contradiction, reversal, or riddle to destabilise ordinary understanding and induce insight.

The text presents the paradox that evil dæmons have extensive power in generation despite not being subservient to human desires.

All passages →
Ritual Puritypraxis

The maintenance of a state of cleanliness—physical, moral, or spiritual—required for encounter with the divine.

The distinction between good and evil dæmons implies a moral or spiritual state of purity required for proper understanding.

All passages →
Self Knowledgesoteriology

The recognition of one's own true divine nature as the primary path to liberation; 'know thyself' as soteriology.

The passage identifies the inability to distinguish good from evil dæmons as a key reason for absurd reasoning about causes.

All passages →
Related passages · 3 parallels
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 4, Section 1
Intr., p. 5. 259 Here we get once more the Aristotelian classification of causes. The Good is:— (i) Formal Cause (1) immanent in the world (Order— τάξις ); (2) containing the world (Embracing Power— περιοχή ). (ii) Efficient Cause (Caus…”
Both passages discuss the nature of causes and the influence of higher beings or powers on the natural world. Iamblichus explores the distinction between good and evil daemons and their effects, while the second passage categorizes the Good as different types of causes and discusses the influence of the Spiritual Light. Both texts delve into the metaphysical and theological underpinnings of natural phenomena.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 6 (part 4)
Then in the spirit of external nature there originated a male and a female kind—namely, in the fiery Mercury the male, and in the watery the female one." ( Clavis , 86.) "On the third day the fiery and the watery Mercury have again entered…”
Both passages discuss the interaction between divine and natural forces, and the role of lesser spiritual beings or powers in the generation and corruption of natural phenomena. They explore the distinction between good and evil influences in the natural world, though from different mystical traditions.
greek_mystery|Orphic Hymns|Hymn XXXI. PALLAS (part 2)
Some are the causes of conversion to inferiors, and of collecting the multitude of progressive natures to their proper principles: while others promote their progression and procreation, emanating from principles, as their source. Some sup…”
Both passages discuss the concept of divine genera and their interactions, including the idea of contrariety and the administration of the universe. They explore how different principles and powers interact, often in opposition, and how these interactions are interpreted by mythologists and poets.