← Home
Iamblichus: On the Mysteries · 70 of 218 · tr. Thomas Taylor

Chapter XXIII

The animadversions which are after this adduced, at first, indeed, doubt about the mode of divination, but as they proceed, endeavour entirely to subvert it. We shall, therefore, discuss both these. And, in the first place, we shall begin to dissolve the former of these doubts. “ For in sleep, when we are not employed about any thing, we sometimes obtain a knowledge of the future. ” Not that the cause of divination is derived both from us and externally: for in things the principle of which definitely subsists in us, and that which is consequent is externally derived, if these two have a coarrangement and connexion with each other, in this case the works of the two are definitely 180 effected, and the things which are suspended from them follow their precedaneous causes. But when the cause is independent of us, and preexists by itself, the end is not defined on account of us, but the whole depends on things external to us. Now, therefore, since the truth which is in dreams does not entirely concur with our works, but frequently shines forth from itself, it shows that divination is externally derived from the Gods, that it possesses an independent power, and that it benevolently unfolds futurity when it pleases, and in such a way as it pleases. These things, therefore, should have an answer of this kind.
Themes
Cosmic Sympathycosmology

The Stoic and Plotinian doctrine that all parts of the cosmos are bound by hidden affinities, so that a movement in one part resonates through the whole; the metaphysical basis for astrology, magic, and divination.

The text describes a coarrangement and connexion between internal truth and external causes that effect works.

All passages →
Divine Providencetheology

Pronoia — the doctrine that the divine actively orders the unfolding of the cosmos and human affairs toward intelligible ends, against pure chance or blind necessity.

The passage centrally argues that the Gods actively order futurity and unfold it benevolently when they please.

All passages →
Gnosis Direct Knowledgesoteriology

Salvation through direct experiential knowledge of the divine nature, not through faith, ritual, or moral works alone.

The text discusses obtaining knowledge of the future through dreams as a form of divine revelation.

All passages →
Hidden Sayingssoteriology

Esoteric teachings reserved for those ready to receive them; outer meaning conceals an inner liberating truth.

The passage references animadversions that subvert the mode of divination, implying esoteric teachings about mystical knowledge.

All passages →
Inner Lightanthropology

The divine spark or luminous quality residing within the human person, potentially recognisable through introspection.

The text states that truth in dreams shines forth from itself independently of human works.

All passages →
Living Godtheology

The divine conceived as active, present, and dynamic—not an abstract principle but a personal responsive reality.

The Gods are portrayed as active agents who unfold futurity when they please.

All passages →
Mystical Unionsoteriology

The merging of the individual soul or self with the divine, transcending personal identity.

Divination is presented as a direct connection between the human mind and divine unfolding.

All passages →
Theurgypraxis

Iamblichean ritual practice that engages the gods directly through consecrated material symbols and actions, on the premise that divine power descends into properly prepared matter — distinct from philosophical contemplation alone.

The passage defends divination as an engagement with divine power that unfolds futurity through consecrated knowledge.

All passages →
Related passages · 2 parallels
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 1, Section 1f
And in all the other Divine enlightenments which the occult Tradition of our inspired teachers hath, by mystic Interpretation, accordant with the Scriptures, bestowed upon us, we also have been initiated: apprehending these things in the pr…”
Both passages discuss the concept of divine revelation and the limitations of human understanding. Iamblichus emphasizes the external derivation of divination from the Gods, while the second passage discusses the mystical interpretation of divine truths and the ultimate union with the divine. Both highlight the transcendent nature of divine knowledge and the human struggle to comprehend it fully.
platonism|Plato: Timaeus|Section 1„
And the converse happens when some gentle inspiration of the understanding pictures images of an opposite character, and allays the bile and bitterness by refusing to stir or touch the nature opposed to itself, but by making use of the natu…”
Both passages discuss the concept of divination and its external, divine origin. They agree that divination is not derived from human actions but from a higher, independent power.