← Home
Orphic Hymns · 9 of 138 · tr. Thomas Taylor

Front Matter, p. 4 (part 3)

Because it is also necessary that the soul, essentially rational, should receive intellect by participation, and that intellectual energy should be of p. 22 two kinds; one primarily subsisting in the divine intellect; but the other subsisting secondarily in its offspring soul. You may add too, the presence of intellectual illumination in body, which is received in as great perfection as its unstable and obscure nature will admit. For how is it possible that the celestial orbs should be for ever circularly moved in one definite order, preserving the same form, and the same immutable power, unless they participated of an intellectual nature. For soul is indeed the constant supplier of motion; but the cause of perpetual station, of indentity and uniform life, reducing unstable motion to a circular revolution, and to a condition eternally the same, must be more ancient than soul. Body, indeed, and whatever is the object of sense, belongs; to the order of things moved by another. But soul is self-motive, p. 23 embracing in itself, in a connected manner, all corporeal motions. And prior to this is immovable intellect. And here it is requisite to observe, that this immaterial nature must not be conceived as similar to any thing inert, destitute of life, and endued with no spirit, but as the principal cause of all motion, and the fountain of all life; as well of that whose streams perpetually return into itself, as of that which subsists in others, and has, on this account only, a secondary and imperfect existence. All things, therefore, depend upon unity, through the medium of intellect and soul. And intellect is of an uniform essence; but soul of a mental form νοειδήσ, and the body of the world vivific, or vital ζωτικὸς. The first cause of all is indeed prior to intellect, but intellect is the first recipient of a divine nature; and soul is divine, so far as it requires an intellectual medium. But the p. 24 body which participates a soul of this kind is divine, in as great a degree as the nature of body will admit. For the illustration of intellectual light, pervades from the principle of things, to the extremes; and is not totally obscured, even when it enters the involutions of matter, and is profoundly merged in its dark and flowing receptacle. Hence we may with reason conclude, that not only the universe, but each of its eternal parts is animated. and endued with intellect, and is in its capacity similar to the universe. For each of these parts, is a universe if compared with the multitude it contains, and to which it is allied. There is, therefore, according to the Orphic and Platonic theology, one soul of the universe; and after this others, which from participating this general soul, dispose the entire parts of the universe into order; p. 25 and one intellect which is participated by souls, and one supreme God, who comprehends the world in his infinite nature, and a multitude of other divinities, who distribute intellectual essences, together with their dependent souls, and all the parts of the world, and who are the perpetual sources of its order, union, and consent. For it is not reasonable to suppose that every production of nature, should have the power of generating its similar, but that the universe and primary essences should not more abundantly possess an ability of such like procreation; since sterility can only belong to the most abject, and not to the most excellent natures. In consequence of this reasoning, Orpheus filled all things with Gods, subordinate to the demiurgus of the whole Δημιυργῷ, every one of which performs the office destined to his divinity, by his superiour p. 26 leader.
Themes
Demiurgecosmology

A secondary creator deity—often ignorant or malevolent—responsible for fashioning the material world, distinct from the supreme transcendent God.

A demiurgus is mentioned as the leader to whom subordinate gods are assigned to perform their offices.

All passages →
Divine Providencetheology

Pronoia — the doctrine that the divine actively orders the unfolding of the cosmos and human affairs toward intelligible ends, against pure chance or blind necessity.

Divinities are described as perpetual sources of the world's order, union, and consent.

All passages →
Monadcosmology

The absolutely simple, undivided first principle from which all multiplicity and existence flows.

The First Cause is described as prior to intellect and the source upon which all things depend.

All passages →
Theosis Deificationsoteriology

The doctrine — central to Eastern Orthodox and Maximian theology — that the human person is progressively transformed into a partaker of the divine nature by grace, not merely justified or united in passing ecstasy.

The text claims that soul is divine and the body participates in divinity to the degree its nature admits.

All passages →
Divine Lighttheology

The uncreated luminous quality of the divine, sometimes experienced directly in mystical states; illumination as revelation.

[auto] Intellectual illumination is described as pervading from the principle of things to the extremes and entering matter.

All passages →
Emanation Hierarchycosmology

A chain of divine beings or principles flowing downward from a single transcendent source (the One or the Father), each level less perfect than the one above.

[auto] The passage explicitly outlines a descending chain of being from the First Cause through Intellect and Soul to Body.

All passages →
Microcosm Macrocosmcosmology

The human being as a small-scale image of the entire cosmos; the body, soul, and intellect mirroring the structure of the heavens and the divine — distinct from correspondence in that it makes the human the privileged mirror.

[auto] The passage states that each part of the universe is a universe in itself and similar to the whole.

All passages →
Tripartite Soulanthropology

Division of the human being into three principles: spirit (pneuma), soul (psyche), and body/matter (hyle or soma).

[auto] The text distinguishes three distinct principles: intellect, soul, and body, describing their specific functions and relationships.

All passages →
Unity Of Beingtheology

The doctrine that all existence is ultimately one substance or one divine reality; non-duality as a theological claim.

[auto] The text asserts that all things depend upon unity through the medium of intellect and soul.

All passages →
Related passages · 13 parallels
neoplatonism|Iamblichus: On the Mysteries|Chapter III
The wise, [49] therefore, speak as follows: The soul having a twofold life, one being in conjunction with body, but the other being separate from all body; when we are awake we employ, for the most part, the life which is common with the bo…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the soul, its relationship with intellect and the divine, and its role in the cosmos. They share a mystical perspective on the soul's connection to higher realities and its influence on the material world.
neoplatonism|Iamblichus: On the Mysteries|Chapter XVIII
According to another division, therefore, the numerous herd [or the great mass] of men is arranged under nature, is governed by physical powers, looks downward to the works of nature, gives completion to the administration of Fate, and to t…”
Both passages discuss the hierarchical structure of existence, with a focus on the distinction between the material, intellectual, and divine realms. They also explore the relationship between these realms and the appropriate modes of worship or understanding for each.
neoplatonism|Iamblichus: On the Mysteries|Chapter VIIId
For it is necessary that every form in the universe should be never failing, in order that the universe may be perfect, and that, being generated from an immoveable cause, it may be immoveable in its essence. But every wholeness is a form,…”
Both passages discuss the structure and immutability of the universe, the role of divine intellect and soul, and the participation of lower entities in higher divine principles. They share a Platonic and Neoplatonic framework, emphasizing the hierarchy and interconnectedness of being.
neoplatonism|Iamblichus: On the Mysteries|Chapter VIIIk
the musical, the telestic, the prophetic, and the amatory, previous to the discussion of each, we must first speak about enthusiasm, and show to what part of the soul the enthusiastic energy pertains; whether each part of it possesses this…”
Both passages discuss the structure of the soul and its relationship with higher divine intellect. They share similar concepts about the hierarchical nature of the soul and its connection to the divine, though they come from different mystical traditions.
neoplatonism|Iamblichus: On the Mysteries|Chapter VIIIw
Cathartic virtue, therefore, alone must be called the salvation of souls; since this cuts off, and vehemently obliterates, material natures, and the passions which adhere to us from generation; separates the soul and leads it to intellect;…”
Both passages discuss the hierarchical structure of reality and the role of intellect and soul in the cosmos. They share similar concepts of triads, monads, and the participation of lower levels of reality in higher ones, reflecting a common Neoplatonic influence.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 100 (part 2)
Such motion alone can constitute its impulse towards its centre: it cannot coincide with the centre, for then there would be no circle; since this may not be, it whirls about it; so only can it indulge its tendence. If, on the other hand,…”
Both passages discuss the concept of the soul as a self-motive essence that governs the motion of bodies and the universe. They share the idea that the soul is more ancient than the body and that it imparts life and motion to inanimate objects, highlighting the rational nature of the soul's governance.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 101
Section 2 2. And what of lower things? [Why have they not this motion?] [Their case is very different]: the single thing here is not an all but a part and limited to a given segment of space; that other realm is all, is space, so to speak,…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the soul and its role in the motion of the universe. Passage A describes the soul as the self-motive essence that governs the motion of celestial bodies rationally, while Passage B describes the soul as the omnipresent force that leads the Kosmos in a continuous, circular motion. Both passages emphasize the soul's role in maintaining the order and motion of the universe.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 389
Section 8 8. B. (10) If the soul is body and permeates the entire body-mass, still even in this entire permeation the blending must be in accord with what occurs in all cases of bodily admixing. Now: if in the admixing of bodies neither con…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the soul and its relationship to the body, emphasizing the incorporeal and self-motive aspects of the soul. They both argue for the soul's role in governing movement and growth, and they both reject the idea that the soul is purely corporeal.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 392 (part 1)
Section 8 8. E. (13) We come to the doctrine of the Entelechy, and must enquire how it is applied to soul. It is thought that in the Conjoint of body and soul the soul holds the rank of Form to the Matter which here is the ensouled body-…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the soul and its relationship to the body, emphasizing the incorporeal and intellectual aspects of the soul. They both argue for the soul's ability to apprehend non-material realities, highlighting the distinction between the soul and the body.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 536
Section 29 29. Qualities must be for this school distinct from Substrates. This in fact they acknowledge by counting them as the second category. If then they form a distinct category, they must be simplex; that is to say they are not compo…”
Both passages discuss the concept of motion and the nature of souls, with a focus on the idea that souls are self-motive and govern the motion of bodies. They share a philosophical exploration of the relationship between the soul and the physical world, though they come from different mystical traditions.
3 more
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 695 (part 2)
For if the act of will springs from God Himself and is as it were His operation and the same will is identical with His essence, He must be self-established. He is not, therefore, "what He has happened to be" but what He has willed to be.…”
Both passages discuss the concept of self-motive nature and its role in the hierarchy of beings. They explore the idea that certain entities are moved by others, while others are self-motive, and how this hierarchy is essential for the order and motion of the universe. The passages share a philosophical inquiry into the nature of motion and the role of soul in governing celestial bodies.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 714
Section 10 10. But how comes the soul not to keep that ground? Because it has not yet escaped wholly: but there will be the time of vision unbroken, the self hindered no longer by any hindrance of body. Not that those hindrances beset that…”
Both passages explore the nature of the divine and the soul's relationship to it. Passage A discusses the hierarchy of beings and the self-motive nature of the soul, while Passage B describes the soul's ascent to understand the Unity, which is beyond being and form. Both emphasize the transcendence of the divine and the soul's role in comprehending it.
platonism|Plato: Timaeus|Section 1s
But they are not so, for they are incapable of reason or intellect; the only being which can properly have mind is the invisible soul, whereas fire and water, and earth and air, are all of them visible bodies. The lover of intellect and kn…”
Both passages discuss the relationship between the divine, the soul, and the physical world, emphasizing the role of intelligence and reason in the cosmos. They share a Platonic perspective on the hierarchy of being and the influence of higher intelligences on the lower realms.