← Home
The Secret Writing According to John (Apocryphon of John), Codex II, 1 · 10 of 24 · tr. Samuel Zinner

Yaltabaoth-a

Further, being an aeon, Sophia of Reflection thought a thought [IV, 15] on her own, together with the conception of the unseen Spirit and Precognition. She willed to bring forth a likeness from out of herself, apart from the agreement of the Spirit, who had not accepted it, and apart from her companion, and apart from his deliberation, and although the face of her maleness had not accepted this. Further, she brought forth despite having failed to find her companion, as well as having deliberated apart from the agreement of the Spirit and the knowledge of her companion, [II, 10] and on account of the invulnerable strength dwelling inside her, her thought did not remain barren, and she produced from herself something that was incomplete and that differed from her own appearance, because she had created him apart from her companion, and he differed from the appearance of his mother, because he possesses a different form. Further, when she saw (the result of) her own will, he morphed into a lion-faced dragon form, and his eyes resembled lightning fires that flash. She thrust him away from her, outside those places, so that none of the immortal ones could [IV, 16] see him, because she had created him in ignorance. She also surrounded him with a shining cloud, and she erected a throne in the midst of the cloud, so that none could see him, apart from the holy Spirit – whose name is the Mother of the Living – and she called his name Yaltabaoth. This is the chief archon who procured a strong power from his mother, and he extricated himself from her, and moved away from the places where he had been born. He grasped and created for himself further aeons with a shining spark that exists (even) now, and he was astounded in his pride that is inside him, and he begot authorities for himself. The first has the name Athoth, whom the generations call [the Reaper]. The second is Harmas, [being the] evil [eye]. The third is Kalila-Oumbri. The fourth is Yabel. The fifth is Adonaiou, who is called Sabaoth. The sixth is Cain, whom [IV, 17] the generations of men call the Sun. The seventh is Abel. The eighth is Abrisene. The ninth is Yobel. [II, 11] The tenth is Armoupieel. The eleventh is Melcheir-Adonein. The twelfth is Belias, who is over the deeps of Hades. He further set up seven kings, each one of whom corresponds to the heavenly firmaments over the seven heavens, and five over the deep of the abyss, so that they would rule. He further shared his fire with them, but he did not dispatch from the power of the light he had procured from his mother, because he is ignorant darkness, and when the light had combined with the darkness, it made the darkness shine, and when the darkness had combined with the light, it darkened the light, and it became neither light nor dark, but it grew gloomy. Further, the archon who is feeble possesses three names, the first name being Yaltabaoth, the second [IV, 18] being Saklas, and the third being Samael, and he is wicked in his pride that is inside him, because he said: ‘I am God, and there is no god other than me,’ because he is unaware of his strength, the place from which he originated. And the archons created seven powers for themselves, and each of the powers created for themselves six angels, so that they numbered 365 angels, and these are the bodies that pertain to the names:
§ Ask Guru about this passage →
Themes
Aeonscosmology

Divine archetypal beings or eternal attributes dwelling within the Pleroma, often arranged in male-female syzygies.

The text identifies Sophia as an aeon and describes Yaltabaoth creating further aeons and authorities for himself.

All passages →
Archonscosmology

Malevolent planetary rulers or demiurgic powers that govern the material world and obstruct the soul's ascent.

The passage lists specific archons (Athoth, Harmas, etc.) created by Yaltabaoth to rule the heavens and the abyss.

All passages →
Cosmic Dualismtheology

Ontological opposition between two primal principles (light/darkness, truth/lie, spirit/matter) as the fundamental structure of reality.

The narrative establishes a fundamental opposition between the light of the Pleroma and the ignorance/darkness of the archon.

All passages →
Cosmogonycosmology

Narratives or doctrines of cosmic origin — how heaven, earth, and the primordial deities first came into being. The Kojiki's deities born alone on the Plain of High Heaven, Voluspo's Ginnungagap, Genesis's tohu wa-bohu, the Timaeus's Demiurge fashioning the Receptacle, the Hesiodic Theogony, the Kalevala's egg-cosmogony, Egyptian Nun-and-Atum. Distinct from emanation_hierarchy (structural-ontological cascade), letters_of_creation (mechanism of creation), and apocatastasis/frashokereti (end-state restoration); cosmogony is temporally-narrative beginning.

The text provides a detailed narrative of the origin of the material cosmos, starting from Sophia's error to the formation of the heavens and angels.

All passages →
Demiurgecosmology

A secondary creator deity—often ignorant or malevolent—responsible for fashioning the material world, distinct from the supreme transcendent God.

Yaltabaoth is explicitly described as an ignorant, prideful archon who claims to be the only God and creates the material world.

All passages →
Divine Lighttheology

The uncreated luminous quality of the divine, sometimes experienced directly in mystical states; illumination as revelation.

The passage contrasts the 'shining spark' and light procured from the mother with the ignorance and darkness of the archon.

All passages →
Fall Of Sophiacosmology

The Gnostic myth of Wisdom's prolapse from the Pleroma — her unilateral desire or error producing the Demiurge and the entrapment of divine sparks in matter.

The passage centrally narrates Sophia's unilateral thought and will apart from the Spirit, resulting in the birth of a flawed entity.

All passages →
Kenomacosmology

The void or emptiness outside the pleroma; the realm of matter, ignorance, and deficiency.

The realm where Yaltabaoth is cast out and rules is described as a place of ignorance and deficiency outside the immortal ones.

All passages →
Numerical Mysticismtheology

Numbers, proportions, and mathematical relationships as the underlying structure of divine reality.

The text meticulously enumerates twelve authorities and calculates a total of 365 angels based on specific numerical groupings.

All passages →
Related passages · 12 parallels
western_esoteric|The Secret Teachings of All Ages (Manly P. Hall)|The Ancient Mysteries and Secret Societies Which Have Influenced Modern Masonic Symbolism-m
Of these shoots one is manifested from above, which is the Great Power, the Universal Mind ordering all things, male, and the other, [is manifested] from below, the Great Thought, female, producing all things. Hence pairing with each other…”
Shared concept: Aeons — Divine archetypal beings or eternal attributes dwelling within the Pleroma, often arranged in male-female syzygies. (derived)
shinto|The Kojiki: The Beginning of Heaven and Earth|Section 1
p. 15 RECORDS OF ANCIENT MATTERS [SECT. I.—THE BEGINNING OF HEAVEN AND EARTH.] The names of the Deities 1 that were born 2 in the Plain of High Heaven 3 when the Heaven and Earth began were the Deity Master-of-the-August-Centre-of-Heaven, 4…”
Shared concept: Cosmogony — Narratives or doctrines of cosmic origin — how heaven, earth, and the primordial deities first came into being. (derived)
theosophy|The Secret Doctrine|Page 55 (part 11)
And if Bath-Kol, in Jewish mysticism, is an articulate praeternatural voice from heaven, revealing to the "chosen people" the sacred traditions and laws, it is only because Vach was called, before Judaism, the "Mother of the Vedas," who ent…”
Shared concept: Cosmogony — Narratives or doctrines of cosmic origin — how heaven, earth, and the primordial deities first came into being. (derived)
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 127
Section 5 5. It may be objected that the Intellectual-Principle possesses its content in an eternal conjunction so that the two make a perfect unity, and that thus there is no Matter there. But that argument would equally cancel the Matter…”
Shared concept: Cosmic Dualism — Ontological opposition between two primal principles (light/darkness, truth/lie, spirit/matter) as the fundamental structure of reality. (derived)
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter XVI (part 8)
188 So writes Schopenhauer in his Counsels and Maxims , and indeed it is very effectively expressed, but we have no foundation whatsoever for regarding man as the summit of that which nature has created. This is only THE HIGHEST THAT WE KN…”
Shared concept: Cosmic Dualism — Ontological opposition between two primal principles (light/darkness, truth/lie, spirit/matter) as the fundamental structure of reality. (derived)
theosophy|The Secret Doctrine|Page 13 (part 3)
It is already the outline of the two "Supremes" -- God and Satan. But in the Stanzas no such idea exists. Most of the Western Christian Kabalists -- pre-eminently Eliphas Levi -- in their desire to reconcile the Occult Sciences with Churc…”
Shared concept: Aeons — Divine archetypal beings or eternal attributes dwelling within the Pleroma, often arranged in male-female syzygies. (derived)
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 1, Section 1f
And in all the other Divine enlightenments which the occult Tradition of our inspired teachers hath, by mystic Interpretation, accordant with the Scriptures, bestowed upon us, we also have been initiated: apprehending these things in the pr…”
Shared concept: Divine Light — The uncreated luminous quality of the divine, sometimes experienced directly in mystical states; illumination as revelation. (derived)
neoplatonism|Iamblichus: On the Mysteries|Chapter VII
Moreover, in the manifestations there is an indication of the order which the powers that are seen possess. For the Gods are surrounded by either Gods or angels; but archangels have angels either preceding or coarranged with them, or follow…”
Shared concept: Archons — Malevolent planetary rulers or demiurgic powers that govern the material world and obstruct the soul's ascent. (derived)
western_esoteric|The Secret Teachings of All Ages (Manly P. Hall)|The Tree of the Sephiroth-g
Thomas Maurice reproduces the above engraving, which is modification of the elaborate tree on the preceding page. The Sephiroth are here superimposed, decreasing in size as they decrease in power and dignity. Thus, the Crown is the greate…”
Shared concept: Numerical Mysticism — Numbers, proportions, and mathematical relationships as the underlying structure of divine reality. (derived)
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 137
Section 15 15. The further question, therefore, is raised whether boundlessness and indetermination are things lodging in something other than themselves as a sort of attribute and whether Privation [or Negation of quality] is also an attri…”
Shared concept: Kenoma — The void or emptiness outside the pleroma; the realm of matter, ignorance, and deficiency. (derived)
theosophy|The Secret Doctrine|Page 53 (part 1)
The Secret Doctrine by H. P. Blavatsky -- Vol. 2 [[Vol. 2, Page]] 52 THE SECRET DOCTRINE. STANZA II. NATURE UNAIDED FAILS. ------- § (5) After enormous periods the Earth creates monsters. (6) The "Creators" are displeased. (7) They…”
Shared concept: Fall Of Sophia — The Gnostic myth of Wisdom's prolapse from the Pleroma — her unilateral desire or error producing the Demiurge and the entrapment of divine sparks in matter. (derived)
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 135
Section 13 13. Are we asked to accept as the substratum some attribute or quality present to all the elements in common? Then, first, we must be told what precise attribute this is and, next, how an attribute can be a substratum. The elemen…”
Shared concept: Kenoma — The void or emptiness outside the pleroma; the realm of matter, ignorance, and deficiency. (derived)
Contrasts · where traditions diverge
hermeticism|Corpus Hermeticum 1: Poimandres|Section 1c
And when she saw that Form of beauty which can never satiate, and him who [now] possessed within himself each single energy of [all seven] Rulers as well as God's own Form, she smiled with love; for 'twas as though she'd seen the image of M…”
Both passages address Gnostic cosmogony and the origin of the material world, but they present opposing theological positions: Passage A depicts the creation as a flawed, ignorant act by a monstrous demiurge (Yaltabaoth) resulting in darkness and error, whereas Passage B describes a harmonious, loving union between divine principles that generates the cosmos and the potential for human immortality.