← Home
The Egyptian Book of the Dead (Papyrus of Ani) · 309 of 357 · tr. E.A. Wallis Budge

Chapter 43 (part 70)

He giveth life to man, He breatheth the breath of life into his nostrils--God is father and mother, the father of fathers, and the mother of mothers. He begetteth, but was never begotten; He produceth, but was never produced; He begat himself and produced himself. He createth, but was never created; He is the maker of his own form, and the fashioner of His own body--God Himself is existence, He endureth without increase or diminution, He multiplieth Himself millions of times, and He is manifold in forms and in members--God hath made the universe, and He hath created all that therein is; He is the Creator of what is in this world, and of what was, of what is, and of what shall be. He is the Creator of the heavens, and of the earth, and of the deep, and of the water, and of the mountains. God hath stretched out the heavens and founded the earth-What His heart conceived straightway came to pass, and when He hath spoken, it cometh to pass and endureth for ever--God is the father of the gods; He fashioned men and formed the gods--God is merciful unto those who reverence Him, and He heareth him that calleth upon Him. God knoweth him that acknowledgeth Him, He rewardeth him that serveth Him, and He protecteth him that followeth Him.[1] Monotheism and polytheism coexistent. Because, however, polytheism existed side by side with monotheism in Egypt, M. Maspero believes that the words "God One" do not mean "One God" in our sense of the words; and Mr. Renouf thinks that the "Egyptian nutar never became a proper name."[2] Whether polytheism grew from monotheism in Egypt, or monotheism from polytheism we will not venture to say, for the evidence of the pyramid texts shows that already in the Vth dynasty monotheism and polytheism were flourishing side by side. The opinion of Tiele is that the religion of Egypt was from the beginning polytheistic, but that it developed in two opposite directions: in the one direction gods were multiplied by the addition of local gods, and in the other the Egyptians drew nearer and nearer to monotheism.[3] The sun the emblem of God. From a number of passages drawn from texts of all periods it is clear that the form in which God made himself manifest to man upon earth was the sun, which the Egyptians called Ra and that all other gods and goddesses were forms of him. The principal authorities for epithets applied to God and to His visible emblem the sun are the hymns and litanies which are found inscribed upon [1. Brugsch, Religion und Mythologie , pp. 96-99. The whole chapter on the ancient Egyptian conception of God should be read with M. Maspero's comments upon it in La Mythologie Égyptienne ( Études de Mythologie , t. ii., p. 189 ff.). 2. Hibbert Lectures , p. 99. 3. Hypothezen omtrent de wording van den Egyptischen Godsdienst (in Geschiedenis van den Godsdienst in de Oudheid , Amsterdam, 1893, p. 25); and see Lieblein, Egyptian Religion , Leipzig, 1884, p. 10. 4 See the chapter "Dieu se manifestant par le soleil," in Pierret, Essai sur la Mythologie Égyptienne , pp. 18, 19.] {p. xciv} Confusion of gods.
Themes
Eschatological Judgmentsoteriology

Final, collective cosmic judgment as an event in which the wicked are sentenced and the cosmos restored; distinct from psychopomp_journey (individual passage at death) and emphasising verdict where Zoroastrian frashokereti emphasises restoration.

The passage mentions the 'dogma of punishments and rewards' completing the belief in the immortality of the soul.

All passages →
Maat Cosmic Ordercosmology

The Egyptian principle of truth, balance, and right order underlying both the cosmos and human conduct; the parallel to Zoroastrian asha and Greek dike.

The text identifies God as 'truth' and states He 'hath stablished the earth thereupon,' reflecting the Egyptian principle of Maat.

All passages →
Sacred Namestheology

Divine names or formulas that carry ontological power, used in prayer, liturgy, or magical practice.

The text discusses the nature of divine names, noting they are 'innumerable,' 'manifold,' and ultimately 'hidden.'

All passages →
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

[auto] The text emphasizes God's unknowability with phrases like 'No man knoweth how to know Him' and 'His name remaineth hidden.'

All passages →
Divine Hiddennesstheology

The supreme God's radical concealment beyond ordinary knowledge or perception; the Hidden Father.

[auto] Multiple passages describe God as 'hidden,' a 'mystery,' and state that 'no man knoweth His form.'

All passages →
Divine Simplicitytheology

The doctrine that God has no parts, divisions, or composite attributes; pure undivided being.

[auto] The emphasis on the 'unity of a supreme and self-existent being' reflects the doctrine that God is an undivided, pure reality without composite attributes.

All passages →
Monadcosmology

The absolutely simple, undivided first principle from which all multiplicity and existence flows.

[auto] The text describes a 'self-existent God who was One Being' who created man, aligning with the concept of an undivided first principle from which existence flows.

All passages →
Unity Of Beingtheology

The doctrine that all existence is ultimately one substance or one divine reality; non-duality as a theological claim.

[auto] The passage centrally argues that ancient Egyptian religion was based on a 'pure monotheism' and belief in a 'One Being' as the supreme reality.

All passages →
Related passages · 27 parallels
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 7 (part 3)
2.) "The inner man stood in heaven; his essences were the Paradise; his body was indestructible. He knew the language of God and the angels, and the language of nature, as may be seen by Adam giving names to all creatures, to each accordin…”
Both passages describe a divine being who is the creator and sustainer of the universe, and emphasize the divine nature of humanity. The Egyptian text focuses on the monotheistic and polytheistic aspects of God, while the second passage highlights the divine essence and power of Adam, the first human.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 12 (part 1)
p. 242 CHAPTER XII. REDEMPTION. "God lives also in man. Therefore if we are but seeking and loving our own (true) self, we then love God. That which we do to each other we are doing to God. He who seeks and finds his brother and siste…”
Both passages emphasize the divine nature of God as the creator and sustainer of life, and the intimate connection between God and humanity. They also highlight the concept of God manifesting in the world, though in different forms (the sun in Passage A and the human form in Passage B).
greek_mystery|Orphic Hymns|Hymn XXV
XXV. TO THE EARTH * The FUMIGATION from every kind of SEED, except BEANS and AROMATICS. O Goddess, Earth, of Gods and men the source, Endu'd with fertile, all destroying force; All-parent, bounding, whose prolific pow'rs, Produce a store of…”
Both passages describe a divine entity as the source of life and creation, emphasizing the generative and nurturing aspects of the deity. The Orphic Hymn focuses on the Earth as a fertile, life-giving force, while the Egyptian text describes God as the creator of the universe and all that is within it, including the heavens and the earth.
greek_mystery|Orphic Hymns|Hymn XLI. MISES (part 1)
XLI. TO MISES. The FUMIGATION from STORAX. Call Thesmophorus * , spermatic God, Of various names, who bears the leafy rod: Mises, ineffable, pure, sacred queen, Two-fold Iacchus, male and female seen: Illustr'ous, whether to rejoice is t…”
Both passages discuss the concept of a divine being that encompasses both male and female aspects and is associated with multiple names and roles. They also touch on the idea of a supreme deity that is both the cause and effect, and the coexistence of monotheistic and polytheistic elements within their respective religious traditions.
hermeticism|Corpus Hermeticum 2: The Serapeum|Section 1d
Not only, then, is God not understood by all, but both unto the gods and some of the men they out of ignorance do give the name of Good, though they can never either be or become Good. For they are very different from God, while Good can n…”
Both passages describe a supreme deity as the ultimate creator and source of all things, emphasizing the divine nature and the relationship between the divine and the created world. They also highlight the idea of the divine being beyond human comprehension and the central role of the deity in existence.
hermeticism|Corpus Hermeticum 12: The Prayer|Section 1e
Observe this too, my son; that each one of the other lives inhabiteth one portion of the Cosmos - aquatic creatures water, terrene earth, and aery creatures air; while man doth use all these - earth, water air [and] fire; he seeth Heaven, t…”
Both passages describe a supreme deity that is the creator and sustainer of the universe, permeating all aspects of existence. They also emphasize the divine attributes of being eternal, all-encompassing, and the source of life and order.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 257
Section 5 5. This Ever-Being is realized when upon examination of an object I am able to say- or rather, to know- that in its very Nature it is incapable of increment or change; anything that fails by that test is no Ever-Existent or, at le…”
Both passages discuss the concept of a divine, eternal, and unified being. Passage A from Plotinus explores the nature of Eternity as an unchanging, all-encompassing life, while Passage B from the Egyptian context describes a supreme, self-existent, and eternal God. Both texts emphasize the unity and timelessness of the divine.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 275 (part 2)
In its character as Life, as emanation, as containing all things in their precise forms and not merely in the agglomerate mass- for this would be to contain them imperfectly and inarticulately- it must of necessity derive from some other Be…”
Both passages discuss the concept of a supreme, singular being that encompasses all things and is the principle of creation. Passage A focuses on the Intellectual-Principle in Neoplatonism, while Passage B discusses the monotheistic beliefs of ancient Egyptians, but both share the idea of a unified, all-encompassing divine principle.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 276 (part 1)
Section 10 10. And what will such a Principle essentially be? The potentiality of the Universe: the potentiality whose non-existence would mean the non-existence of all the Universe and even of the Intellectual-Principle which is the prim…”
Both passages discuss the concept of a supreme, singular, and transcendent being that is the source of all existence. They explore the nature of this being and its relationship to the intelligible and intellectual principles, albeit within different religious and philosophical frameworks.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 412
Section 3 3. Yet, looking at another set of facts, reflection tells us that we are in sympathetic relation to each other, suffering, overcome, at the sight of pain, naturally drawn to forming attachments; and all this can be due only to som…”
Both passages discuss the concept of a supreme, self-existent being and the creation of the world and living beings. They also touch on the immortality of the soul and the hidden, mysterious nature of the divine. The passages come from different traditions but share similar theological insights.
17 more
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 458
Section 5 5. We return to our statement that The First remains intact even when other entities spring from it. In the case of numbers, the unit remains intact while something else produces, and thus number arises in dependence on the unit:…”
Both passages discuss the concept of a supreme, transcendent unity or monotheistic deity that exists beyond the material and intellectual realms. Passage A from Plotinus describes a unity that transcends the Intellectual-Principle, while Passage B from the Egyptian context describes a supreme, self-existent God who is one and alone.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 464
Section 11 11. It is infinite also by right of being a pure unity with nothing towards which to direct any partial content. Absolutely One, it has never known measure and stands outside of number, and so is under no limit either in regard t…”
Both passages discuss the concept of a singular, supreme being that is beyond multiplicity and is the source of all creation. They emphasize the unity and primacy of this being, which is a central theme in both mystical traditions.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 471
Section 4 4. Another consideration is that if The Good [and First] is simplex and without need, it can neither need the intellective act nor possess what it does not need: it will therefore not have intellection. (Interpolation or corruptio…”
Both passages discuss the concept of a supreme, infinite, and unseen God who is beyond human comprehension and exists outside of the material world. They emphasize the unity and eternity of this divine being, which is a central theme in both mystical traditions.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 477
Section 3 3. In the case of twin birth among human beings how can we make out the Reason-Principles to be different; and still more when we turn to the animals and especially those with litters? Where the young are precisely alike, there is…”
Both passages discuss the concept of a singular, self-existent unity or divine being that underlies the multiplicity of existence. They emphasize the primacy and purity of this unity, which is distinct from the manifold things it encompasses.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 547 (part 1)
Section 9 9. The above considerations- to which others, doubtless, might be added- suffice to show that these five are primary genera. But that they are the only primary genera, that there are no others, how can we be confident of this?…”
Both passages explore the concept of unity and plurality in the context of a supreme being or principle. Passage A discusses the nature of Being as a diversified unity, while Passage B describes the Egyptian belief in a supreme, self-existent God who is one but manifests through symbolic polytheism.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 567
Section 6 6. Granted, it may be urged, that these observations upon the nature of Substance are sound, we have not yet arrived at a statement of its essence. Our critic doubtless expects to see this "Sensible": but its essence, its characte…”
Both passages explore the concept of a supreme, unified being that encompasses plurality and multiplicity. Passage A discusses the universal Intellect producing particulars while remaining a unity, whereas Passage B describes the Egyptian belief in a self-existent, one God who created all things and is hidden and mysterious.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 568
Section 7 7. But Matter, it may be contended, is the source of existence to the Sensible things implanted in it. From what source, then, we retort, does Matter itself derive existence and being? That Matter is not a Primary we have establis…”
Both passages discuss the unity and eternity of a supreme being and the interconnectedness of all existence. Passage A focuses on the unity of Being and Intellect in Neoplatonism, while Passage B describes the monotheistic beliefs of ancient Egyptians, emphasizing the unity and eternity of God.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 618
Section 11 11. But how can the unextended reach over the defined extension of the corporeal? How can it, so, maintain itself as a unity, an identity? This is a problem often raised and reason calls vehemently for a solution of the difficult…”
Both passages emphasize the unity and omnipresence of a supreme being, the concept of a single, eternal, and self-existent God who is the creator of all things. They also highlight the idea of the divine being hidden and mysterious, yet inherently present in all aspects of existence.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 633 (part 1)
Section 13 13. It cannot reasonably be thought that the notion of unity is derived from the object since this is physical- man, animal, even stone, a presentation of that order is something very different from unity [which must be a thing…”
Both passages explore the concept of the infinite and the unity of a supreme being. Passage A discusses the nature of the infinite and its relationship to unity and multiplicity, while Passage B describes the ancient Egyptian belief in a single, infinite, and eternal God. Both texts grapple with the idea of the limitless and its connection to a supreme, unified principle.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 640 (part 1)
Section 1 1. God, or some one of the gods, in sending the souls to their birth, placed eyes in the face to catch the light and allotted to each sense the appropriate organ, providing thus for the safety which comes by seeing and hearing in…”
Both passages discuss the concept of unity and the nature of a supreme being. Passage A explores the idea of unity as an inherent concept within the mind, while Passage B describes the ancient Egyptian belief in a single, self-existent God. Both texts emphasize the fundamental importance of unity and the divine.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 640 (part 2)
If then the future is present, it must be present as having been foreconceived for later coming to be; at that divine stage therefore it lacks nothing and therefore can never lack; all existed, eternally and in such a way that at the later…”
Both passages discuss the concept of unity as a fundamental principle. Passage A explores unity as an intellectual and metaphysical concept, while Passage B describes the Egyptian belief in the unity of a supreme being. Both emphasize the primacy and foundational nature of unity in their respective contexts.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 662
Section 23 23. That which soul must quest, that which sheds its light upon Intellectual-Principle, leaving its mark wherever it falls, surely we need not wonder that it be of power to draw to itself, calling back from every wandering to res…”
Both passages discuss the concept of a supreme, unified principle or being that encompasses multiplicity within unity. Plotinus describes the Intellectual-Principle as a multiple unity, while the Egyptian text discusses the unity and eternity of God, who is also described as encompassing all things.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 710 (part 2)
Unity, self-present, it has no need of self-intellection: indeed this "self-presence" were better left out, the more surely to preserve the unity; we must eliminate all knowing and all association, all intellection whether internal or exter…”
Both passages discuss the concept of a self-existent, eternal, and all-powerful God. They explore the unity and sovereignty of the divine being, emphasizing that God is not subject to external influences or prior conditions.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 713 (part 1)
Section 9 9. In this choiring, the soul looks upon the wellspring of Life, wellspring also of Intellect, beginning of Being, fount of Good, root of Soul. It is not that these are poured out from the Supreme lessening it as if it were a th…”
Both passages emphasize the concept of unity as fundamental to existence and being. Passage A discusses the unity of a supreme God in Egyptian mysticism, while Passage B explores the role of unity in the philosophy of Plotinus, highlighting how unity is essential for the existence of all things.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 713 (part 2)
Any that have seen know what I have in mind: the soul takes another life as it approaches God; thus restored it feels that the dispenser of true life is There to see, that now we have nothing to look for but, far otherwise, that we must put…”
Both passages discuss the concept of unity and the nature of the divine. Passage A explores the unity of Being and the Intellectual-Principle in Neoplatonism, while Passage B discusses the monotheistic beliefs of ancient Egyptians, emphasizing the unity and eternity of God. Both texts grapple with the idea of a supreme, singular divine principle.
western_esoteric|The Secret Teachings of All Ages (Manly P. Hall)|Qabbalistic Keys to the Creation of Mand
Having thus established the inferior universe in perfect accord with the esoteric teachings of the Hindu, Egyptian, and Greek Mysteries, the Elohim next turned their attention to the production of flora and fauna and lastly man. "And God s…”
Both passages discuss the androgynous nature of the divine and the coexistence of monotheistic and polytheistic elements in their respective religious traditions. They also explore the concept of creation and the divine's role in it, showing a conceptual parallel in their mystical interpretations.
western_esoteric|Transcendental Magic I: The Doctrine (Éliphas Lévi)|2. The Pillars Of The Templeb
Such is the mysterious language of the Kabalists in the Talmud, and on account of vulgar ignorance and malignity, it is impossible for us to explain or simplify it further. What then is creation? It is the house of the creative Word. Wha…”
Both passages explore the nature of the divine and the interplay between opposing forces. Passage A discusses the self-creating, self-sustaining nature of God and the coexistence of monotheism and polytheism, while Passage B delves into the dualistic principles of creation and the balance between opposing forces, such as man and woman, light and shadow, and good and evil. Both texts emphasize the complexity and interconnectedness of divine and cosmic principles.