← Home
Pseudo-Dionysius: The Mystical Theology · 11 of 11 · tr. C.E. Rolt

Chapter Vd

safeguards the position against pure negativity by explaining that they are not absent either. The rest of this chapter deals with the qualities (1) of inanimate matter; (2 ) of material life. 537 It is not (1) a Thinking Subject; nor (2) an Act or Faculty of Thought; nor (3) an Object of Thought. 538 Divine Names, II. 7. Godhead is regarded as the property of Deified men, and so belongs to relativity. 539 It knows only Itself, and there knows all things in their Super-Essence—sub specie aeternitatis. 540 Truth is an Object of Thought. Therefore, being beyond objectivity, the ultimate Reality is not Truth. But still less is It Error. 541 Cf. p. 199, n. 2. 542 It is (1) richer than all concrete forms of positive existence; (2) more simple than the barest abstraction. (Cf. p. 196, n. i.)
Themes
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

The passage explicitly defines God by negation, stating He is not a Thinking Subject, Act of Thought, or Object of Thought.

All passages →
Body As Obstacleanthropology

The material body viewed as a prison, tomb, or source of error that hinders spiritual knowledge and return.

The text distinguishes divine reality from inanimate matter and material life, implying the former is deficient or obstructive to true knowledge.

All passages →
Cosmic Dualismtheology

Ontological opposition between two primal principles (light/darkness, truth/lie, spirit/matter) as the fundamental structure of reality.

The passage contrasts the ultimate Reality with relativity and material existence, establishing an ontological opposition between the divine and the deficient world.

All passages →
Divine Hiddennesstheology

The supreme God's radical concealment beyond ordinary knowledge or perception; the Hidden Father.

The ultimate Reality is described as beyond objectivity and relativity, indicating a radical concealment from ordinary perception.

All passages →
Gnosis Direct Knowledgesoteriology

Salvation through direct experiential knowledge of the divine nature, not through faith, ritual, or moral works alone.

The passage emphasizes knowing only oneself in their Super-Essence rather than through external objects or thought.

All passages →
Monadcosmology

The absolutely simple, undivided first principle from which all multiplicity and existence flows.

The ultimate Reality is described as a singular, undivided source that transcends multiplicity and categories like Truth or Error.

All passages →
Mystical Unionsoteriology

The merging of the individual soul or self with the divine, transcending personal identity.

The text describes the ultimate Reality knowing all things in their Super-Essence through a direct, non-objective knowledge.

All passages →
Paradox As Teachingethics

Using apparent contradiction, reversal, or riddle to destabilise ordinary understanding and induce insight.

The passage uses contradictory statements such as God being richer than positive existence yet more simple than abstraction to describe the divine nature.

All passages →
Self Knowledgesoteriology

The recognition of one's own true divine nature as the primary path to liberation; 'know thyself' as soteriology.

The text states that the ultimate Reality knows only itself and all things in their Super-Essence through this singular knowing.

All passages →
Unity Of Beingtheology

The doctrine that all existence is ultimately one substance or one divine reality; non-duality as a theological claim.

The passage suggests that knowing oneself reveals the knowledge of all things in their Super-Essence, implying an underlying ontological unity.

All passages →
Related passages · 3 parallels
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 238 (part 1)
Section 6 6. the Intellectual Essence, wholly of the order of Ideal-form, must be taken as impassive has been already established. But Matter also is an incorporeal, though after a mode of its own; we must examine, therefore, how this sta…”
Both passages discuss the nature of ultimate reality and its relationship to thought and existence. They explore the idea that the ultimate reality is beyond objectivity and thought, and that it is the source of all existence, albeit in different theological contexts.
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter I (part 5)
It is not true because our experimental knowledge is not a confused perception of a real world . It is a very acute perception of an entirely unreal world appearing round about us at the moment of our contact with the world of true causes,…”
Both passages explore the limitations of human perception and understanding in relation to ultimate reality. Pseudo-Dionysius discusses the transcendence of the divine beyond human concepts and thought, while the second passage critiques the ability of human senses and reason to perceive the true nature of reality, aligning with Kant's ideas.
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter XIX (part 4)
We constantly observe the conditions of materiality in those cases in which we must create in our life a sequence of phenomena or are obliged to select , because our matter does not permit us to juxtapose in a definite interval of time more…”
Both passages explore the limitations of human perception and knowledge within the constraints of materiality and the three-dimensional world. They also touch on the idea of transcending these limitations through expanded or changed forms of receptivity and consciousness.