← Home
Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names · 3 of 6 · tr. C.E. Rolt

Chapter 7, Section 1c

And in the same way we attribute lack of Reason to Him that is above Reason, and Imperfectibility to Him that is above and before Perfection; and Intangible and Invisible Darkness we attribute to that Light which is Unapproachable because It so far exceeds the visible light. And thus the Mind of God embraces all things in an utterly transcendent knowledge and, in Its causal relation to all things, anticipates within Itself the knowledge of them all—knowing and creating angels before the angels were, and knowing all other things inwardly and (if I may so put it) from the very beginning, and thus bringing them into existence. And methinks this is taught by the Scripture when it saith “Who knoweth all things before their birth.” 410 410 Susannah 42. For the Mind of God gains not Its knowledge of things from those things; but of Itself and in Itself It possesses, and hath conceived beforehand in a causal manner, the cognizance and the knowledge and the being of them all. And It doth not perceive each class speciically, 411 411 “According to its idea,” “according to the law of its species.” We perceive that this is a rose and that is a horse because we have two separate notions in our minds—one the notion of a rose and the other that of a horse. But in the Divine Knowledge there is only one Notion wherein such specific notions are elements, as the activities of several nerves are elements in one indivisible sensation of taste, or touch, or smell. but in one embracing casuality It knows and maintains all things—even as Light possesses beforehand in itself a causal knowledge of the darkness, not knowing the darkness in any other way than from the Light. 412 412 i. e. Suppose the light were conscious, and knew its own nature, it would know that if it withheld its brightness there would be darkness (for the very nature of light is that it dispels, or at least prevents, darkness). On the other hand, the light could not directly know the darkness, because darkness cannot exist where there is light. The simile is capable of being applied to illustrate God’s knowledge of the world, because the world is imperfect. It applies more fundamentally to God’s knowledge of evil, and is so employed by St. Thomas Aquinas, who quotes this passage and says (Summa, xiv. 10) that, since evil is the lack of good, God knows evil things in the act by which He knows good things, as we know darkness through knowing light. Thus the Divine Wisdom in knowing Itself 151 will know all things: will in that very Oneness know and produce material things immaterially, divisible things indivisibly, manifold things under the form of Unity. For if God, in the act of causation, imparts Existence to all things, in the same single act of causation He will support all these His creatures the which are derived from Him and have in Him their forebeing, and He will not gain His knowledge of things from the things themselves, but He will bestow upon each kind the knowledge of itself and the knowledge of the others. And hence God doth not possess a private knowledge of Himself and as distinct therefrom a knowledge embracing all the creatures in common; for the Universal Cause, in knowing Itself, can scarcely help knowing the things that proceed from it and whereof It is the Cause. With this knowledge, then, God knoweth all things, not through a mere understanding of the things but through an understanding of Himself. For the angels, too, are said by the Scripture to know the things upon earth not through a sense-perception of them (though they are such as may be perceived this way), but through a faculty and nature inherent in a Godlike Intelligence. 3.
Themes
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

The text extensively uses negation to describe God's transcendence, stating He is above Reason, Imperfectibility, and Intangible Darkness.

All passages →
Divine Hiddennesstheology

The supreme God's radical concealment beyond ordinary knowledge or perception; the Hidden Father.

The text emphasizes God's Unapproachability and Intangible Darkness, indicating radical concealment beyond ordinary perception.

All passages →
Divine Lighttheology

The uncreated luminous quality of the divine, sometimes experienced directly in mystical states; illumination as revelation.

Light is used as a central metaphor for the divine nature, described as Unapproachable and possessing causal knowledge of Darkness.

All passages →
Emanation Hierarchycosmology

A chain of divine beings or principles flowing downward from a single transcendent source (the One or the Father), each level less perfect than the one above.

The text describes a causal relationship where God creates angels before they exist and maintains creatures derived from Him.

All passages →
Evil As Privationtheology

Augustinian and Plotinian doctrine that evil has no positive being of its own but is a lack, distortion, or absence of the good — denying ontological dualism while preserving moral seriousness.

The passage explicitly defines evil as the lack of good and darkness as a lack of light that God knows through knowing light.

All passages →
Gnosis Direct Knowledgesoteriology

Salvation through direct experiential knowledge of the divine nature, not through faith, ritual, or moral works alone.

The text describes God's knowledge as direct causal possession rather than acquired from external things.

All passages →
Living Godtheology

The divine conceived as active, present, and dynamic—not an abstract principle but a personal responsive reality.

God is depicted as an active creator who brings things into existence through causal knowledge.

All passages →
Monadcosmology

The absolutely simple, undivided first principle from which all multiplicity and existence flows.

The Universal Cause is described as a singular source from which all creatures derive and are derived.

All passages →
Paradox As Teachingethics

Using apparent contradiction, reversal, or riddle to destabilise ordinary understanding and induce insight.

The text presents the paradox that Light possesses causal knowledge of Darkness without directly knowing it.

All passages →
Self Knowledgesoteriology

The recognition of one's own true divine nature as the primary path to liberation; 'know thyself' as soteriology.

The passage asserts that God knows all things through an understanding of Himself rather than external perception.

All passages →
Related passages · 6 parallels
neoplatonism|Iamblichus: On the Mysteries|Chapter III
In the first place, therefore, you say, “ it must be granted that there are Gods .” Thus to speak, however, is not right on this subject. For an innate knowledge of the Gods is coexistent with our very essence; and this knowledge is superio…”
Both passages discuss the nature of divine knowledge and its relationship to creation. They emphasize that divine knowledge is not derived from external sources but is inherent and unified, encompassing all things within a single, transcendent understanding.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 167
Section 11 11. Now, in the first place, if the Soul has not actually come down but has illuminated the darkness, how can it truly be said to have declined? The outflow from it of something in the nature of light does not justify the asserti…”
Both passages explore the relationship between a higher, divine realm and the lower, material world, focusing on the nature of illumination, knowledge, and creation. They discuss how the higher realm (Soul or Divine Mind) interacts with and brings into being the lower realm, though from different philosophical and theological perspectives.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 444 (part 2)
The entire intellectual order may be figured as a kind of light with the One in repose at its summit as its King: but this manifestation is not cast out from it: we may think, rather, of the One as a light before the light, an eternal irrad…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine as transcending intellect and knowledge, emphasizing that the divine is beyond defined knowing and that creation is known through the divine's self-knowledge.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 680
Section 41 41. Intellection seems to have been given as an aid to the diviner but weaker beings, an eye to the blind. But the eye itself need not see Being since it is itself the light; what must take the light through the eye needs the lig…”
Both passages discuss the nature of divine knowledge and its relationship to creation, emphasizing the unity and self-sufficiency of the divine mind. They explore how the divine essence transcends human understanding and how the divine knowledge encompasses all things without needing external reference.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 708
Section 4 4. The main part of the difficulty is that awareness of this Principle comes neither by knowing nor by the Intellection that discovers the Intellectual Beings but by a presence overpassing all knowledge. In knowing, soul or mind a…”
Both passages discuss the nature of divine knowledge and the limitations of human understanding in comprehending the divine. They explore the idea that God's knowledge is not derived from external sources but is inherent and unified, transcending the multiplicity of created things.
sufism|The Masnavi, Book I (Rumi)|STORY Vd
But the light that lights the heart is the Light of God, Which is distinct from the light of reason and sense. At night there is no light, and colors are not seen; Hence we know what light is by its opposite, darkness. At night no colors…”
Both passages explore the concept of divine knowledge and the relationship between the divine and the created world, emphasizing the transcendence and unity of God's knowledge and the manifestation of opposites.