← Home
Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names · 8 of 16 · tr. C.E. Rolt

Chapter 2, Section 1h

Even so if any one says that Very Life lives, or that Very Light is enlightened, he will be wrong (according to my view) unless, perchance, he were to use these terms in a different sense from the ordinary one to mean that the qualities of created things pre-exist, after a superlative manner as touching their true Being in the Creative Originals. 208 208 So St. Augustine constantly teaches that God acts not in the manner which we call activity, but by causing the creature itself to perform the action. Thus he explains God’s rest on the Seventh Day to mean not that God Himself rested but that the creation now rested in Him. Aristotle and his disciple, St. Thomas, teach that God moves all things simply through being desired by them. So God causes action without Himself acting (somewhat as fire causes warmth without feeling it). Cf. p. 87, n. 1. 9. Even the plainest article of Divinity, namely the 76 Incarnation and Birth of Jesus in Human Form, cannot be expressed by any Language or known by any Mind—not even by the first of the most exalted angels. That He took man’s substance is a mysterious truth, the which we have received; but we know not how from the Virgin’s seed He was formed in another manner than is natural, nor how His dry feet supporting the solid weight of His material body He walked upon the unstable substance of the water, nor understand we any of the other things which belong to the Supernatural Nature of Jesus. Of these things I have spoken enough elsewhere; and our renowned Teacher hath wonderfully 209 209 ὑπερφυῶς. The proper meaning of ὑπερφυής in the Dionysian writings appears to be “supernatural.” declared, in his Elements of Divinity , what he hath either learnt directly from the Sacred Writers, or else hath discovered from his cunning research concerning Scriptural truths through the much toil and labour which he bestowed thereon, or else hath had revealed unto him by some diviner inspiration wherein he received not only true spiritual notions but also true spiritual motions , 210 210 οὺ μόνον μαθὼν ἀλλὰ καὶ παθὼν τὰ θεῖα. and by the kinship of his mind with them (if I may so express it) was perfected to attain without any other teacher to a mystical communion with these verities and a belief therein. 211 211 πρὸς τὴν ὰδιδακτὸν αὐτῶν καὶ μυστικὴν ἀποτελεσθεὶς ἕνωσιν καὶ πίστιν. And to put before them in briefest compass the many blessed speculations of his ingenious mind thus speaketh he concerning Jesus in his compilation of the Elements of Divinity . 10. From the Elements of Divinity , by S. Hierotheus. The Universal Cause which filleth all things is the Deity of Jesus, whereof the parts are in such wise tempered to the whole that It is neither whole nor part, and yet is at the same time whole and also part, 77 containing in Its all-embracing unity both part and whole, and being transcendent and antecedent to both. 212 212 Being beyond Unity the Godhead is, of course, beyond the categories of whole and part.
Themes
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

The text explicitly states that Jesus' nature cannot be expressed by language or known by any mind.

All passages →
Divine Hiddennesstheology

The supreme God's radical concealment beyond ordinary knowledge or perception; the Hidden Father.

The passage emphasizes that the truth of Jesus' formation is beyond ordinary knowledge and language.

All passages →
Divine Lighttheology

The uncreated luminous quality of the divine, sometimes experienced directly in mystical states; illumination as revelation.

The passage discusses 'Very Light' and its relation to the Creative Originals in a non-literal sense.

All passages →
Divine Simplicitytheology

The doctrine that God has no parts, divisions, or composite attributes; pure undivided being.

The text describes God as transcendent and antecedent to both whole and part, indicating an undivided nature.

All passages →
Emanation Hierarchycosmology

A chain of divine beings or principles flowing downward from a single transcendent source (the One or the Father), each level less perfect than the one above.

The passage distinguishes between created things and their 'true Being in the Creative Originals'.

All passages →
Gnosis Direct Knowledgesoteriology

Salvation through direct experiential knowledge of the divine nature, not through faith, ritual, or moral works alone.

The text describes a mystical communion with verities attained without any other teacher.

All passages →
Hidden Sayingssoteriology

Esoteric teachings reserved for those ready to receive them; outer meaning conceals an inner liberating truth.

The passage notes that certain truths about Jesus' formation are mysterious and beyond ordinary understanding.

All passages →
Mystical Unionsoteriology

The merging of the individual soul or self with the divine, transcending personal identity.

The text describes a mystical communion with the verities and a belief therein achieved through spiritual motions.

All passages →
Paradox As Teachingethics

Using apparent contradiction, reversal, or riddle to destabilise ordinary understanding and induce insight.

The passage uses the paradoxical statement that God is neither whole nor part yet contains both.

All passages →
Unity Of Beingtheology

The doctrine that all existence is ultimately one substance or one divine reality; non-duality as a theological claim.

The text describes the Universal Cause as a unity that contains both part and whole in its all-embracing nature.

All passages →
Related passages · 12 parallels
buddhism|Vajrakkhedika (Diamond Cutter)|Section 1f
Because, O Subhûti, the highest perfect knowledge of the holy and enlightened Tathâgatas is produced from it; the blessed Buddhas are produced from it. And why? Because, O Subhûti, when the Tathâgata preached: [1. See Childers, s.v. Lok…”
Both passages discuss the nature of enlightenment and the transcendence of conventional categories. The Diamond Sutra emphasizes the absence of qualities and the non-attainment of any particular state, while the Christian mystical text discusses the transcendence of God and the ineffability of divine actions, both pointing towards a reality beyond ordinary understanding.
buddhism|Vajrakkhedika (Diamond Cutter)|Section 1g
Therefore he is called an Anâgâmin.' Bhagavat said: 'What do you think, O Subhûti, does an Arhat think in this wise: The fruit of an Arhat has been obtained by me?' Subhûti said: 'Not indeed, O Bhagavat, an Arhat does not think in this wise…”
Both passages discuss the nature of enlightenment and the transcendence of conventional categories. The Diamond Sutra emphasizes the non-dualistic nature of the Arhat and the Tathagata, while the Christian mystical text discusses the transcendence of God and the ineffable nature of divine actions, both pointing towards a reality beyond ordinary conceptual understanding.
buddhism|Vajrakkhedika (Diamond Cutter)|Section 1n
This prophecy is supposed to have been addressed by Dîpankara to S âkyamuni, before he had become a Buddha.] perfect knowledge has been known, he would speak an untruth, and would slander me, O Subhûti, with some untruth that he has learned…”
Both passages explore the concept of the transcendence of ultimate reality beyond conventional categories and language. The Diamond Sutra emphasizes the emptiness of all phenomena and the inability of language to capture ultimate truth, while the Christian mystical text discusses the ineffability of divine nature and the limitations of human understanding in describing the divine.
buddhism|Vajrakkhedika (Diamond Cutter)|Section 1p
If, O Subhûti, there existed a stock of merit, the Tathâgata would not have preached: "A stock of merit, a stock of merit indeed!"'(19) XX. 'What do you think then, O Subhûti, is a Tathâgata to be seen (known) by the shape of his visible b…”
Both passages explore the paradoxical nature of ultimate reality and the limitations of human perception and language in describing it. They emphasize the transcendence of the divine or ultimate truth beyond conventional categories and understanding.
buddhism|Vajrakkhedika (Diamond Cutter)|Section 1r
This probably refers to the auspicious signs discovered in S âkyamuni at his birth, which left it open whether he should become a king or a Buddha.] A Buddha is to be seen (known) from the Law; for the Lords (Buddhas) have the Law-body; And…”
Both passages explore the ineffable nature of ultimate reality (Dharma-body in Buddhism and God in Christianity) and the limitations of language in describing it. They also discuss the transcendence of these ultimate realities beyond conventional categories and the paradoxical nature of their existence.
gnosticism|Pistis Sophia|Document SECONDƒ
And added also Jesus, said he to his disciples, Yet therefore my Disciples and my friends and my brothers, let each be sober of the spirit which (is) in him that ye may listen and understand every word which I shall say to you, because from…”
Both passages explore the nature of the divine and its relationship to creation, emphasizing the ineffable and transcendent aspects of the divine mystery. They share a focus on the profound, unknowable aspects of the divine, though they use different theological frameworks and terminology.
gnosticism|Pistis Sophia|Document SECOND„
And that Mystery indeed is that which knoweth because of what the Dissension became, and because of what became the Reconciliation. And that Mystery indeed is that which knoweth because of what became the Covetousness, and because of what…”
Both passages explore mystical concepts related to the nature of divine mysteries and the ineffable aspects of the divine. They discuss the limitations of human understanding and the supernatural qualities of the divine, albeit within different theological frameworks.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 243
Section 11 11. I think, in fact, that Plato had this in mind where he justly speaks of the Images of Real Existents "entering and passing out": these particular words are not used idly: he wishes us to grasp the precise nature of the relati…”
Both passages explore the relationship between a transcendent principle (Ideas in Plotinus, Divine Originals in the Dionysian text) and the material or created world. They discuss how the transcendent influences the material without being altered or affected by it, highlighting a form of participation or interaction that preserves the essential nature of both realms.
platonism|Plato: Phaedo|Section 1~
I might compare him to a person who began by maintaining generally that mind is the cause of the actions of Socrates, but who, when he endeavored to explain the causes of my several actions in detail, went on to show that I sit here because…”
Both passages discuss the nature of causality and the role of higher principles (mind/soul in Plato, Divine in Augustine) in governing actions and existence. They emphasize the distinction between superficial causes and true, underlying causes.
platonism|Plato: Phaedrus|Section 1ƒ
The specific which you have discovered is an aid not to memory, but to reminiscence, and you give your disciples not truth, but only the semblance of truth; they will be hearers of many things and will have learned nothing; they will appear…”
Both passages discuss the limitations of written or spoken words in conveying true knowledge or divine truths. Plato's Socrates argues for the superiority of the 'living word of knowledge' over written words, while the second passage discusses the inadequacy of language in expressing divine truths, emphasizing the need for mystical communion and divine inspiration.
2 more
renaissance_hermeticism|The Heroic Enthusiasts, Part II (Gli Eroici Furori)|First Dialoguei
"It is not," says he, "gold and silver that makes one like God, because these are not treasure to Him; nor vestments, for God is naked; nor ostentation and fame, for He shows Himself to few, and perhaps not one knows Him, and certainly many…”
Both passages explore the relationship between the divine and the human, emphasizing the transcendence of God and the human struggle to comprehend or attain divine qualities. They share a mystical approach to understanding the divine, though they come from different religious traditions.
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter XVII (part 10)
By ourselves we are simply out of relation with each other, for we are both of us there, and different from each other, which is a positive relation. What we are without knowing, it knows that we are. It is as if the total universe of inn…”
Both passages explore the relationship between individual consciousness and a broader, encompassing reality. Passage A discusses the idea of individual perceptions contributing to a larger, universal consciousness, while Passage B describes the relationship between the divine and created things, emphasizing the interconnectedness and the transcendent nature of the divine.