← Home
Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names · 6 of 16 · tr. C.E. Rolt

Chapter 2, Section 1f

Yea, ‘tis a common and undifferenced activity of the whole Godhead that It is wholly and entirely communicated unto each of them that share It and unto none merely in part; 197 197 D. here touches on the fundamental difference between spiritual and material things. Cf. Shelley: “True love has this different from gold or clay that to divide is not to take away.” even as the centre of a circle is shared by all the radii which surround it in a circle; 198 198 Plotinus uses the same illustration (Enn. iv. 1). and as there are many impressions of a seal all sharing in the seal which is their archetype while yet this is entire, nor is it only a part thereof that belongeth unto any of them. But the Incommunicable All-creative Godhead transcends all such symbols in that It is beyond Apprehension nor hath It any other mode of communion such as to join It unto the participants. 199 199 D. is always on his guard against Pantheism. Perhaps, however, some one will say: “The seal is not entire and the same in all the printed copies.” I answer that this is not due to the seal itself (for it gives itself wholly and identically to each), but the difference of the substances which share it makes the impressions of the one, entire, identical archetype to be different. For instance, if they are soft, plastic, and smooth, and have no print already, and are neither hard and resistent, nor yet melting and unstable, the imprint will be clear, plain, and permanent; 73 but if the aforesaid fitness should in aught be lacking, then the material will not take the impression and reproduce it distinctly, and other such results will follow as an unsuitable material must bring about. 6. Again, it is by a Differentiated act of God’s benevolence that the Super-Essential Word should wholly and completely take Human Substance of human flesh and do and suffer all those things which, in a special and particular manner, belong to the action of His Divine Humanity. In these acts the Father and the Spirit have no share, except of course that they all share in the loving generosity of the Divine counsels and in all that transcendent Divine working of unutterable mysteries which were performed in Human Nature by Him Who as God and as the Word of God is Immutable. 200 200 Redemption is a work performed by the whole Trinity through the Second Person. (So, too, is Creation. Cf. p. 65, n. 2). So do we strive to differentiate the Divine Attributes, according as these Attributes are Undifferenced or Differentiated. 201 201 i. e. We strive to distinguish the two planes of Being in God. Cf. Athan. Creed: “Neither confounding the Persons,” etc. 7. Now all the grounds of these Unifications, and Differentiations in the Divine Nature which the Scriptures have revealed to us, we have explained in the Outlines of Divinity, to the best of our abilities, treating separately of each. The latter class we have philosophically unravelled and unfolded, and so have sought to guide the holy and unspotted mind to contemplate the shining truths of Scripture, while the former class we have endeavoured (in accordance with Divine Tradition) to apprehend as Mysteries in a manner beyond the activities of our minds. 202 202 Undifference belongs to the ultimate Godhead, Differentiation to the distinction between the Three Persons of the Trinity. The former is the sphere of Mystical Theology, the latter is that of Dogmatic Theology. The former implies the Via Negativa the latter the Via Affirmativa. For 74 all Divine things, even those that are revealed to us, are only known by their Communications.
Themes
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

The passage explicitly states that the Incommunicable All-creative Godhead is 'beyond Apprehension' and transcends symbols.

All passages →
Divine Hiddennesstheology

The supreme God's radical concealment beyond ordinary knowledge or perception; the Hidden Father.

The Godhead is described as 'beyond Apprehension' and transcending symbols.

All passages →
Divine Simplicitytheology

The doctrine that God has no parts, divisions, or composite attributes; pure undivided being.

The text emphasizes that the Godhead is 'wholly and entirely communicated' without division or parts.

All passages →
Emanation Hierarchycosmology

A chain of divine beings or principles flowing downward from a single transcendent source (the One or the Father), each level less perfect than the one above.

The distinction between the Incommunicable Godhead and the differentiated acts of God's benevolence implies a hierarchical structure.

All passages →
Gnosis Direct Knowledgesoteriology

Salvation through direct experiential knowledge of the divine nature, not through faith, ritual, or moral works alone.

The text describes guiding the mind to contemplate 'shining truths' beyond the activities of our minds.

All passages →
Hidden Sayingssoteriology

Esoteric teachings reserved for those ready to receive them; outer meaning conceals an inner liberating truth.

The passage distinguishes between revealed truths and mysteries that are apprehended as Mysteries beyond mind.

All passages →
Living Godtheology

The divine conceived as active, present, and dynamic—not an abstract principle but a personal responsive reality.

God is described as actively performing works in Human Nature through the Word of God.

All passages →
Logoscosmology

The divine reason, word, or ordering principle through which the universe was created; mediates between the transcendent God and the material world.

The passage discusses the 'Super-Essential Word' taking Human Substance and suffering in particular acts.

All passages →
Mystical Unionsoteriology

The merging of the individual soul or self with the divine, transcending personal identity.

The text describes the sharing of the Godhead among participants as a form of communion transcending ordinary difference.

All passages →
Paradox As Teachingethics

Using apparent contradiction, reversal, or riddle to destabilise ordinary understanding and induce insight.

The author uses the seal analogy to illustrate how God's entirety is shared without diminishment.

All passages →
Unity Of Beingtheology

The doctrine that all existence is ultimately one substance or one divine reality; non-duality as a theological claim.

The text asserts that the Godhead is 'wholly and entirely communicated' to all participants without part.

All passages →
Related passages · 7 parallels
greek_mystery|Orphic Hymns|Hymn XXXIII. APOLLO (part 3)
Ζεὺς δέ τε πάντων ἐςὶ ϑεὸς, πάντων τε κεραςὴς, Πνέυμασι συζι#ων, ( ) φωναῖσι τε ἀερομικτοις· That is, "But Jupiter is the God of all, and the mingler of all things; whistling with the breathing winds and aerial voices." And this perfectly a…”
Both passages discuss the concept of a divine archetype and its relationship to the material world, using the metaphor of a seal and its impressions. They explore the idea of unity and multiplicity in divine creation, though from different theological perspectives.
neoplatonism|Iamblichus: On the Mysteries|Chapter VIIIi
This, however, our philanthropic lord and father Jupiter understanding, that we might not be entirely deprived of communion with the Gods, has given us observation through sacred arts , by which we have at hand sufficient assistance.” For t…”
Both passages discuss the nature of divine unity and communication. Pseudo-Dionysius explores the undifferenced activity of the Godhead and its communication to participants, while the second passage from Proclus discusses the profound union of the Gods and their ineffable principle of things. Both emphasize the transcendent and unified nature of the divine.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 63
Section 2 2. Let us, then, go back to the source, and indicate at once the Principle that bestows beauty on material things. Undoubtedly this Principle exists; it is something that is perceived at the first glance, something which the soul…”
Both passages discuss the concept of divine communication and the manifestation of divine qualities in the material world. Passage A from Plotinus explores the idea of beauty as a reflection of divine form, while Passage B from the Christian mystical tradition discusses the communication of the divine nature to participants. Both emphasize the unity and wholeness of the divine in its interaction with the material world.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 146 (part 1)
Section 1 1. Are not Being and Reality (to on and he ousia) distinct; must we not envisage Being as the substance stripped of all else, while Reality is this same thing, Being, accompanied by the others- Movement, Rest, Identity, Differenc…”
Both passages explore the nature of reality and the distinctions within it. Plotinus discusses the constituents of reality and their differentiation, while the second passage delves into the undifferentiated and differentiated aspects of the Divine Nature. Both texts grapple with the concept of unity and multiplicity within a higher reality.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 352
Section 32 32. If we can trace neither to material agencies [blind elements] nor to any deliberate intention the influences from without which reach to us and to the other forms of life and to the terrestrial in general, what cause satisfac…”
Both passages discuss the concept of a unified whole that encompasses all individual entities, with each entity having a connection to the whole. They explore the idea of a common soul or essence that binds everything together, though they use different terminology and frameworks (Plotinus' Neoplatonism vs. Christian mysticism).
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 613
Section 6 6. The Intellectual Beings, thus, are multiple and one; in virtue of their infinite nature their unity is a multiplicity, many in one and one over many, a unit-plurality. They act as entire upon entire; even upon the partial thing…”
Both passages discuss the concept of unity and multiplicity, using the metaphor of a seal and its impressions to illustrate how a single, undivided essence can manifest in multiple forms without being diminished or divided. They explore the idea of an absolute or divine unity that is present in all things, yet remains transcendent.
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter XXII (part 12)
"The cause of all things is neither soul nor intellect; nor has it imagination, opinion, or reason, or intelligence; nor is it reason or intelligence; nor is it spoken or thought. It is neither number, nor order, nor magnitude, nor littlen…”
Both passages explore the concept of divine unity and the relationship between the divine and the material world, using similar metaphors such as the circle and its center to illustrate the unity and differentiation of divine attributes and human connection to the divine.