← Home
Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names · 2 of 6 · tr. C.E. Rolt

Chapter 11, Section 1b

Plotinus says the Godhead is indivisibly divided. doth not leave Its own Unity, but, even in the act of going forth to all things, remains entirely within Itself through the excess of that all-transcendent Unity: concerning these things ‘tis neither right nor possible for any creature to frame any language or conception. Let us, then, describe that Peace (inasmuch as It transcends all things) as “Unutterable,” yea and “Unknowable”; and, so far as ‘tis possible for men and for ourselves who are inferior to many 175 good men, let us examine those cases where It is amenable to our intuitions and language through being manifested in created things. 2. Now, the first thing to say is this: that God is the Fount of Very Peace and of all Peace, both in general and in particular, and that He joins all things together in an unity without confusion whereby they are inseparably united without any interval between them, and at the same time stand unmixed each in its own form, not losing their purity through being mingled with their opposites nor in any way blunting the edge of their clear and distinct individuality. Let us, then, consider that one and simple nature of the Peaceful Unity which unites all things to Itself to themselves and to each other, and preserves all things, distinct and yet interpenetrating in an universal cohesion without confusion. Thus it is that the Divine Intelligences derive that Unity whereby they are united to the activities and the objects of their intuition; 472 472 Contemplation, Act of Contemplation, and Object Contemplated are all united together, and so imply a fundamental Unity which exists ultimately in God. and rise up still further to a contact, beyond knowledge, with truths which transcend the mind. Thus it is that souls, unifying their manifold reasoning powers and concentrating them in one pure spiritual act, advance by their own ordered path through an immaterial and indivisible act of spiritual intuition. Thus it is that the one and indissoluble connection of all things exists by reason of its Divine harmony, and is fitted together with perfect concord, agreement and congruity, being drawn into one without confusion and inseparably held together. For the entirety of that perfect Peace penetrates to all things through the simple, unalloyed presence of Its unifying power, uniting all things and binding the extremities together through the intermediate parts, 176 all things being thus conjoined by one homogenous attraction. And It bestows even upon the utmost limits of the universe the enjoyment of Its Presence, and makes all things akin to one another by the unities, the identities, the communions and the mutual attractions which It gives them; for the Divine Peace remains indivisible and shows forth all Its power in a single act, and permeates the whole world without departing from Its own Identity. For It goes forth to all things and gives to all things of Itself (according to their kinds), and overflows with the abundance of Its peaceful fecundity, and yet through the transcendence of Its unification It remains wholly and entirely in a state of Absolute Self-Unity. 473 473 Cf. p. 174, n. 3. 3. “But,” some one perchance will say, “in what sense do all things desire peace? Many things rejoice in opposition and difference and distinction, and would never choose willingly to be at rest.” Now if the opposition and difference here intended is the individuality of each thing, and the fact that naught (while it remains itself) wishes to lose this quality, then neither can we deny this statement; but, however, we shall show that this itself is due to a desire for Peace. For all things love to have peace and unity in themselves and to remain without moving or falling from their own existence or properties.
Themes
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

The text explicitly describes God as 'Unutterable' and 'Unknowable', transcending language and conception.

All passages →
Cosmic Sympathycosmology

The Stoic and Plotinian doctrine that all parts of the cosmos are bound by hidden affinities, so that a movement in one part resonates through the whole; the metaphysical basis for astrology, magic, and divination.

All things are bound by hidden affinities and drawn into one without confusion through a universal cohesion.

All passages →
Divine Hiddennesstheology

The supreme God's radical concealment beyond ordinary knowledge or perception; the Hidden Father.

The Divine remains beyond human language and conception, concealed from ordinary knowledge.

All passages →
Divine Simplicitytheology

The doctrine that God has no parts, divisions, or composite attributes; pure undivided being.

The text emphasizes God's 'one and simple nature' and indivisible Unity without parts or confusion.

All passages →
Emanation Hierarchycosmology

A chain of divine beings or principles flowing downward from a single transcendent source (the One or the Father), each level less perfect than the one above.

Divine Intelligences derive Unity from God and souls advance through an ordered path toward Him.

All passages →
Living Godtheology

The divine conceived as active, present, and dynamic—not an abstract principle but a personal responsive reality.

God is described as actively going forth to all things and giving of Itself.

All passages →
Monadcosmology

The absolutely simple, undivided first principle from which all multiplicity and existence flows.

The text centers on God's 'indivisible Unity' and 'one and simple nature' as the fundamental principle.

All passages →
Mystical Unionsoteriology

The merging of the individual soul or self with the divine, transcending personal identity.

All things are united to God in an inseparable connection without confusion.

All passages →
Opposites Transcendedanthropology

The dissolution of binary oppositions (male/female, inner/outer, above/below) as a mark of spiritual completion.

The text describes a state where things stand unmixed each in its own form without losing their purity through being mingled with opposites.

All passages →
Paradox As Teachingethics

Using apparent contradiction, reversal, or riddle to destabilise ordinary understanding and induce insight.

The passage uses the paradoxical statement that God remains wholly in a state of Absolute Self-Unity while going forth to all things.

All passages →
Return To Sourcesoteriology

The soul's journey back to its divine origin, reversing the fall into matter through stages of purification or illumination.

Souls advance through an ordered path toward God by rising to contact with truths beyond knowledge.

All passages →
Separation From Sourcesoteriology

The felt condition of exile from one's divine origin — Rumi's reed flute torn from its bed, Plotinus's 'we have forgotten,' the Gnostic forgetfulness; the affective wound that complements return_to_source and gives the return its motive.

The text contrasts the superior state of God with the inferior condition of creatures who cannot frame language about Him.

All passages →
Spiritual Ascentpraxis

A staged journey of the soul upward through heavenly realms or levels of being toward the divine source.

Souls advance by concentrating their reasoning powers in a pure spiritual act through an ordered path.

All passages →
Unity Of Beingtheology

The doctrine that all existence is ultimately one substance or one divine reality; non-duality as a theological claim.

The passage describes God as the Fount of Very Peace and the source that unites all things in an inseparable unity without confusion.

All passages →
Related passages · 70 parallels
greek_mystery|Orphic Hymns|Hymn XXXI. PALLAS (part 2)
Some are the causes of conversion to inferiors, and of collecting the multitude of progressive natures to their proper principles: while others promote their progression and procreation, emanating from principles, as their source. Some sup…”
Both passages discuss the nature of divine unity and its relationship with multiplicity and contrariety. They explore how the divine remains indivisible while manifesting in diverse and sometimes opposing forms, reflecting a deep conceptual parallel in their mystical insights.
neoplatonism|Iamblichus: On the Mysteries|Chapter Vb
Again, however, according to another mode of considering the subject, it is necessary to ascribe to the Gods the whole of that which is united, of whatever kind it may be; that which is firmly established in itself, and which is the cause o…”
Both passages discuss the unity and transcendence of the divine, emphasizing the indivisible nature of the Godhead and its role in uniting all things. They share a mystical perspective on the divine as a source of peace and harmony, transcending human comprehension.
neoplatonism|Iamblichus: On the Mysteries|Chapter VII
Of the extremes, therefore, one is supreme, transcendent, and perfect; but the other is last in dignity, deficient, and more imperfect. And the former, indeed, is capable of accomplishing all things at once, uniformly in an instant; but the…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine and its relationship to creation, emphasizing unity, transcendence, and the distinction between the supreme and the imperfect. They explore how the divine interacts with the world while maintaining its own unity and perfection.
neoplatonism|Iamblichus: On the Mysteries|Chapter VIIIb
Hence, through these things such a corporeal-formed division as you introduce, is demonstrated to be false. It is, indeed, especially necessary not to propose any thing of this kind; but if this should appear to you to be requisite, yet yo…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine and its relationship to the material world, emphasizing the incorporeal and omnipresent nature of the divine. They both argue against the idea that the divine can be confined to specific places or forms, highlighting the unity and transcendence of the divine.
neoplatonism|Iamblichus: On the Mysteries|Chapter IXb
For in things which are of a kindred nature, according to essence and power, or which are, in a certain respect, of the same species, or homogeneous, a certain comprehension, or conservation, may be discovered. But in such things as are en…”
Both passages discuss the nature of divine unity and its relationship with the world. They explore how the divine, while transcendent, interacts with and unifies various aspects of creation, though they come from different philosophical and mystical traditions.
neoplatonism|Iamblichus: On the Mysteries|Chapter Xa
After these things, you again subjoin another division for yourself, “ in which you separate the essences of the more excellent genera by the difference of passive and impassive .” But neither do I admit this division. For no one of the mo…”
Both passages discuss the nature of divine beings and their relationship to passivity and unity. Iamblichus emphasizes the impassivity and immutability of divine genera, while Plotinus describes the indivisible unity and peace of the Godhead. Both texts explore the transcendence and perfection of divine entities.
neoplatonism|Iamblichus: On the Mysteries|Chapter XVa
After this, you pass on to another division into contraries, viz. the division of Gods with reference to dæmons. For you say, “ that the Gods are pure intellects ;” but you propose this opinion as an hypothesis, or you narrate it as a dog…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine and the relationship between the divine and human supplication or contemplation. They share a common theme of the unity and transcendence of the divine, and the role of human actions in connecting with this divine unity.
neoplatonism|Iamblichus: On the Mysteries|Chapter XVII
We will exchange, therefore, this division for the doubt which may be adduced by you against the present opinion. “ For ,” it may be said by you, “ how, conformably to what we assert, can the sun and moon, and the visible natures in the hea…”
Both passages discuss the nature of divine beings and their relationship with corporeal forms. They explore the idea of divine unity and incorporeality, with Iamblichus focusing on celestial divinities containing bodies within their divine lives and Plotinus discussing the indivisible unity of the Godhead.
neoplatonism|Iamblichus: On the Mysteries|Chapter XIXb
And secondary genera, indeed, remain with invariable sameness in the one of such as are primary; but the primary impart from themselves union to the secondary genera, and all of them possess in each other the communion of an indissoluble co…”
Both passages discuss the unity and interconnection of divine entities and the universe, emphasizing the indivisible nature of the divine and its role in uniting all things without confusion or loss of individuality.
neoplatonism|Iamblichus: On the Mysteries|Chapter III
Dissolving, however, the doubts in a way still more true, we think it requisite, in invoking superior natures, to take away the evocations 208 which appear to be directed to them as to men, and also the mandates in the performance of works,…”
Both passages discuss the unity and indivisibility of the divine, emphasizing that the divine nature is not divided or separated but rather unifies all things in a harmonious and indivisible manner. They both stress the transcendence of the divine and the inability of human language to fully capture its essence.
60 more
neoplatonism|Iamblichus: On the Mysteries|Chapter XII
It is, necessary, however, to discuss these things particularly, and to show how they subsist, and what reason they possess. It is requisite, therefore, to understand that the universe is one animal; and that the parts in it are, indeed, se…”
Both passages discuss the unity and interconnectedness of all things in the universe, emphasizing the role of a divine or universal principle that binds and harmonizes everything. They share a mystical perspective on the nature of reality and the underlying unity that transcends individual parts.
neoplatonism|Iamblichus: On the Mysteries|Chapter II
The hostile opposition, therefore, in the things that are now proposed, may be easily dissolved by demonstrating the dignity of wholes with 226 respect to parts, and by recalling to your recollection the exempt transcendency of the Gods abo…”
Both passages discuss the transcendence and unity of divine beings and their relationship with the material world. They explore the idea of the divine as a whole that is distinct from and superior to its parts, and the nature of the soul's connection to the body.
neoplatonism|Iamblichus: On the Mysteries|Chapter XVII
What, therefore, shall we derive from the Gods who are entirely exempt from all human generation, with respect to sterility, or abundance or any thing else pertaining to [the mortal] life? Nothing whatever. For it is not the province of tho…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine and its interaction with the material world. They explore the idea of the divine being transcendent yet immanent, and the manner in which divine gifts or influences are bestowed upon the material realm. The passages share a conceptual parallel in their mystical approach to understanding the divine.
neoplatonism|Iamblichus: On the Mysteries|Chapter XIX
On this subject, however, there is also the following division. Of divine essences and powers some have [a genesiurgic] soul and nature subject and ministrant to their fabrications, whenever they wish to use them. But others are entirely se…”
Both passages discuss the nature of divine essences and their relationship with the material and immaterial worlds. They explore the concept of unity and the intermediaries that connect different levels of existence, showing a genuine conceptual parallel across different mystical traditions.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 12
Section 8 8. And towards the Intellectual-Principle what is our relation? By this I mean, not that faculty in the soul which is one of the emanations from the Intellectual-Principle, but The Intellectual-Principle itself [Divine-Mind]. This…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine and its relationship to the individual soul or intellect. They explore the concepts of unity, indivisibility, and the emanation of divine principles into the world, showing a genuine conceptual parallel between the mystical traditions of Plotinus and the author of Passage B.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 129
Section 7 7. Empedokles in identifying his "elements" with Matter is refuted by their decay. Anaxagoras, in identifying his "primal-combination" with Matter- to which he allots no mere aptness to any and every nature or quality but the effe…”
Both passages discuss the nature of unity and the divine. Passage A from Plotinus explores the concept of the Intellectual-Principle and the unity of being, while Passage B discusses the Godhead's indivisible unity and its role in binding all things together. Both texts delve into the metaphysical aspects of unity and the divine, showing a genuine conceptual parallel.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 158
Section 2 2. Therefore we must affirm no more than these three Primals: we are not to introduce superfluous distinctions which their nature rejects. We are to proclaim one Intellectual-Principle unchangeably the same, in no way subject to d…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine and the soul's relationship to it, emphasizing unity, contemplation, and the soul's role in maintaining order and harmony. They share a mystical perspective on the divine and the soul's connection to it.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 189
Section 2 2. By derivation from that Authentic Kosmos, one within itself, there subsists this lower kosmos, no longer a true unity. It is multiple, divided into various elements, thing standing apart from thing in a new estrangement. No lon…”
Both passages discuss the concept of unity and emanation from a divine source, with Plotinus describing the Intellectual Principle and its emanation as Reason-Form, while the second passage elaborates on the Godhead's unity and its manifestation in created things. Both emphasize the divine harmony and the interconnectedness of all things.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 199
Section 12 12. Suppose this Universe were the direct creation of the Reason-Principle applying itself, quite unchanged, to Matter, retaining, that is, the hostility to partition which it derives from its Prior, the Intellectual Principle- t…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine and its relationship to creation, emphasizing unity and the indivisibility of the divine principle. They explore how the divine interacts with the material world and the souls within it, highlighting themes of unity and harmony.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 203 (part 2)
That one Reason-Principle, then, must be the unification of conflicting Reason-Principles whose very opposition is the support of its coherence and, almost, of its Being. And indeed, if it were not multiple, it could not be a Universal Pri…”
Both passages discuss the concept of unity and multiplicity within a divine principle, exploring how unity can encompass diversity and opposition, and how this unity is fundamental to the nature of the divine.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 225
Section 4 4. Does each individual Soul, then, contain within itself such a Love in essence and substantial reality? Since not only the pure All-Soul but also that of the Universe contain such a Love, it would be difficult to explain why our…”
Both passages explore the concept of a universal love or unity that permeates all things, with individual manifestations reflecting a greater whole. They discuss the interconnectedness of all beings and the divine nature of love or unity.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 249
Section 17 17. Nor can we, on the other hand, think that matter is simply Absolute Magnitude. Magnitude is not, like Matter, a receptacle; it is an Ideal-Principle: it is a thing standing apart to itself, not some definite Mass. The fact is…”
Both passages discuss the concept of unity and emanation from a divine source. Passage A from Plotinus describes the emanation of magnitude from the Intellectual Principle, while Passage B discusses the divine unity and its manifestation in created things. Both explore the idea of a higher reality influencing and unifying the lower.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 255
Section 3 3. What, then, can this be, this something in virtue of which we declare the entire divine Realm to be Eternal, everlasting? We must come to some understanding of this perpetuity with which Eternity is either identical or in confo…”
Both passages discuss the concept of divine unity and eternity, emphasizing the indivisible nature of the divine realm and its eternal, unchanging existence. They explore the idea of unity within diversity and the transcendence of the divine.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 263 (part 1)
Section 11 11. To this end we must go back to the state we affirmed of Eternity, unwavering Life, undivided totality, limitless, knowing no divagation, at rest in unity and intent upon it. Time was not yet: or at least it did not exist fo…”
Both passages explore the concept of unity and the emergence of multiplicity from a divine, unified source. They discuss the nature of time and eternity in relation to the soul and divine principles, showing a genuine conceptual parallel.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 274 (part 2)
The Intellectual-Principle on the other hand was never merely the Principle of an inviolable unity; it was a universal as well and, being so, was the Intellectual-Principle of all things. Being, thus, all things and the Principle of all, i…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine as a unified principle that encompasses all things while remaining indivisible. They explore the concept of unity and plurality within the divine, showing a genuine conceptual parallel.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 275 (part 2)
In its character as Life, as emanation, as containing all things in their precise forms and not merely in the agglomerate mass- for this would be to contain them imperfectly and inarticulately- it must of necessity derive from some other Be…”
Both passages discuss the concept of a singular, transcendent source or principle that is the origin of all things. They explore the nature of this principle as being simple, unified, and prior to all other beings, which is a genuine conceptual parallel across different mystical traditions.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 283
Section 1 1. In the Intellectual Kosmos dwells Authentic Essence, with the Intellectual-Principle [Divine Mind] as the noblest of its content, but containing also souls, since every soul in this lower sphere has come thence: that is the wor…”
Both passages discuss the concept of unity and division within a divine or intellectual framework, exploring how the divine or intellectual principle remains undivided while also being present in divided forms. They share a mystical exploration of the nature of unity and multiplicity.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 285 (part 2)
The magnitude present in any mass is definitely one thing, yet its identity from part to part does not imply any such community as would entail common experience; within that identity there is diversity, for it is a condition only, not the…”
Both passages discuss the concept of unity and division in a divine or transcendent essence. They explore how this essence can be both indivisible and present in all things without losing its unity, showing a genuine conceptual parallel across different mystical traditions.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 292
Section 5 5. But what place is left for the particular souls, yours and mine and another's? May we suppose the Soul to be appropriated on the lower ranges to some individual, but to belong on the higher to that other sphere? At this there w…”
Both passages discuss the concept of unity and division within the divine and the souls. They explore how individual souls or intelligences maintain their unity while being part of a greater whole, reflecting a genuine conceptual parallel across different mystical traditions.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 306
Section 19 19. Are we to think of the indivisible phase of the soul and the divided as making one thing in a coalescence; or is the indivisible in a place of its own and under conditions of its own, the divisible being a sequent upon it, a…”
Both passages discuss the concept of unity and division within the soul or divine nature, exploring how the indivisible and divisible aspects coexist and interact. They share a mystical exploration of the nature of unity and its manifestation in different realms.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 406
Section 6 6. Something besides a unity there must be or all would be indiscernibly buried, shapeless within that unbroken whole: none of the real beings [of the Intellectual Kosmos] would exist if that unity remained at halt within itself:…”
Both passages discuss the concept of unity and plurality, the emanation of beings from a higher unity, and the interconnectedness of all things. They share a mystical perspective on the nature of reality and the divine, though they come from different traditions.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 414
Section 5 5. How then can a multitude of essential beings be really one? Obviously either the one essence will be entire in all, or the many will rise from a one which remains unaltered and yet includes the one- many in virtue of giving its…”
Both passages discuss the concept of unity and multiplicity, exploring how a single essence can be present in many forms without being divided. They both use examples and analogies to illustrate the idea of an indivisible unity that permeates all things.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 425
Section 9 9. Anaxagoras, again, in his assertion of a Mind pure and unmixed, affirms a simplex First and a sundered One, though writing long ago he failed in precision. Heraclitus, with his sense of bodily forms as things of ceaseless proce…”
Both passages discuss the concept of a unified, transcendent divine principle that remains indivisible while manifesting in all things. They explore the nature of unity and the divine as a source of peace and harmony, showing a genuine conceptual parallel across different mystical traditions.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 427
Section 11 11. Since there is a Soul which reasons upon the right and good- for reasoning is an enquiry into the rightness and goodness of this rather than that- there must exist some permanent Right, the source and foundation of this reaso…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine as a unified, indivisible principle that permeates all things. They explore the concept of unity and the relationship between the divine and the individual soul or intelligence, showing a genuine conceptual parallel.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 447 (part 1)
Section 15 15. Conferring- but how? As itself possessing them or not? How can it convey what it does not possess, and yet if it does possess how is it simplex? And if, again, it does not, how is it the source of the manifold? A single,…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine as a unity that emanates multiplicity while remaining transcendent and simple. They explore the concept of unity and multiplicity in relation to the divine source, showing a genuine conceptual parallel.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 452 (part 2)
And again, if that secondary is all things, and if above its multiplicity there is a unity not ranking among those things, once more this unity transcends Real Being and therefore transcends the Intellectual-Principle as well. There is thu…”
Both passages discuss the concept of a transcendent unity that is beyond the Intellectual-Principle or Divine Intelligences, emphasizing the indivisible and unifying nature of the divine. They share a mystical exploration of the relationship between the divine and the multiplicity of existence.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 457
Section 4 4. We have said that all must be brought back to a unity: this must be an authentic unity, not belonging to the order in which multiplicity is unified by participation in what is truly a One; we need a unity independent of partici…”
Both passages discuss the concept of unity and the divine as a singular, indivisible entity. They explore the idea of the One or the Godhead transcending multiplicity and maintaining unity while encompassing all things, though they come from different mystical traditions.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 470
Section 3 3. We may be told that nothing prevents an identity being thus multiple. But there must be a unity underlying the aggregate: a manifold is impossible without a unity for its source or ground, or at least, failing some unity, relat…”
Both passages discuss the concept of unity and the nature of the divine, emphasizing the idea of a singular, indivisible source that underlies all things. They explore the relationship between unity and multiplicity, and the transcendence of the divine unity.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 472
Section 5 5. And again: the multiple must be always seeking its identity, desiring self-accord and self-awareness: but what scope is there within what is an absolute unity in which to move towards its identity or at what term may it hope fo…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine and the concept of unity and intellection. Passage A from Plotinus focuses on the Absolute Good and the intellective act, while Passage B from the mystical tradition elaborates on the Divine Unity and the Peaceful Unity, showing a genuine conceptual parallel in their exploration of divine unity and the nature of divine intellection.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 500
Section 8 8. If, then, the Intellection is an act upon the inner content [of a perfect unity], that content is at once the Idea [as object: eidos] and the Idea itself [as concept: idea]. What, then, is that content? An Intellectual-Principl…”
Both passages discuss the unity and indivisibility of the divine or intellectual principle, emphasizing the interconnectedness of being and intellect. They share a mystical perspective on the nature of reality and the divine, though they come from different traditions.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 511
Section 3 3. But perhaps we should rather speak of some single category, embracing Intellectual Substance, Matter, Form, and the Composite of Matter and Form. One might refer to the family of the Heraclids as a unity in the sense, not of a…”
Both passages discuss the nature of unity and substance, with Passage A focusing on the gradation of substances and their common origin, while Passage B explores the indivisible unity of the Godhead and its relationship with all things. Both texts delve into the concept of unity and the interconnectedness of existence, albeit from different philosophical and mystical perspectives.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 519 (part 1)
Section 12 12. If then we do not propose to divide Quality in this [fourfold] manner, what basis of division have we? We must examine whether qualities may not prove to be divisible on the principle that some belong to the body and others…”
Both passages explore the nature of qualities and their classification, with Passage A focusing on the division of qualities in the physical and spiritual realms, and Passage B discussing the unity and peace of the Divine, which also involves the classification and interaction of qualities. Both texts delve into metaphysical concepts and the nature of existence.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 540
Section 2 2. In asserting that Being is not a unity, we do not mean to imply a definite number of existences; the number may well be infinite: we mean simply that it is many as well as one, that it is, so to speak, a diversified unity, a pl…”
Both passages explore the concept of unity and multiplicity within a divine or metaphysical context. They discuss how unity can encompass diversity without losing its essential nature, and how this unity is fundamental to the structure of existence.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 541
Section 3 3. We assert, then, a plurality of Existents, but a plurality not fortuitous and therefore a plurality deriving from a unity. But even admitting this derivation from a unity- a unity however not predicated of them in respect of th…”
Both passages discuss the concept of unity and multiplicity, exploring how a transcendent unity can manifest as multiple existents or genera. They share a mystical perspective on the nature of the One and its relationship to the many, though they come from different traditions.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 545
Section 7 7. What, then, are the several entities observable in this plurality? We have found Substance [Essence] and life simultaneously present in Soul. Now, this Substance is a common property of Soul, but life, common to all souls, diff…”
Both passages explore the unity and multiplicity of being, discussing how different aspects such as motion, stability, and unity are interconnected. They share a mystical approach to understanding the nature of reality, emphasizing the indivisible unity of the divine and its manifestation in the world.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 546 (part 1)
Section 8 8. We cannot indeed escape positing these three, Being, Motion, Stability, once it is the fact that the Intellect discerns them as separates; and if it thinks of them at all, it posits them by that very thinking; if they are thou…”
Both passages explore the concepts of unity, being, and the nature of the divine intellect. They discuss the indivisible division of the divine and the interplay between stability, motion, and being, showing a genuine conceptual parallel across different mystical traditions.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 548
Section 10 10. In what sense is the particular manifestation of Being a unity? Clearly, in so far as it is one thing, it forfeits its unity; with "one" and "thing" we have already plurality. No species can be a unity in more than an equivoc…”
Both passages explore the concept of unity and its relationship to being and multiplicity. They discuss how unity is not a genus but a principle that underlies all things, and how it remains indivisible even as it manifests in diverse forms.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 549 (part 1)
Section 11 11. We are bound however to enquire under what mode unity is contained in Being. How is what is termed the "dividing" effected- especially the dividing of the genera Being and unity? Is it the same division, or is it different…”
Both passages explore the concept of unity and its relationship with being and perfection, drawing from the philosophical tradition of Plotinus. They discuss the nature of unity in different realms and its aspiration towards perfection, showing a genuine conceptual parallel.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 557
Section 19 19. Having established our four primary genera, it remains for us to enquire whether each of them of itself alone produces species. And especially, can Being be divided independently, that is without drawing upon the other genera…”
Both passages explore the concept of unity and the nature of being, with Passage A discussing the interrelation of primary genera and their role in forming Intellect, while Passage B delves into the indivisible unity of the Godhead and its manifestation in all things. Both texts emphasize the idea of unity and the interconnectedness of existence.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 559 (part 1)
Section 21 21. How then does the universal Intellect produce the particulars while, in virtue of its Reason-Principle, remaining a unity? In other words, how do the various grades of Being, as we call them, arise from the four primaries?…”
Both passages explore the concept of unity and plurality within a divine or intellectual realm, discussing how a singular, transcendent principle can give rise to multiplicity while remaining undivided. They share a mystical perspective on the nature of being and the interplay between unity and diversity.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 597
Section 7 7. Let us consider once more how it is possible for an identity to extend over a universe. This comes to the question how each variously placed entity in the multiplicity of the sense order can have its share in one identical Prin…”
Both passages explore the concept of a unified, indivisible principle that permeates and connects all things. Passage A uses metaphors like light and a hand to illustrate how a single principle can be present throughout a multiplicity, while Passage B discusses the Divine Intelligences and the unifying power of God, emphasizing the indivisible nature of the Divine Unity.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 599
Section 9 9. If in such a partition of the unity, that which entered into each participant were an entire- always identical with the first- then, in the progressive severance, the firsts would become numerous, each particular becoming a fir…”
Both passages discuss the concept of unity and the emanation of powers or attributes from a divine source, exploring how these powers remain connected to their origin while being present in the multiplicity of creation. They both delve into the idea of an indivisible unity that permeates all things without losing its integrity.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 601
Section 11 11. Still, this integral omnipresence admitted, why do not all things participate in the Intellectual Order in its entirety? Why has it a first participant, a second, and so on? We can but see that presence is determined by the f…”
Both passages discuss the concept of unity and presence in a divine or intellectual order, emphasizing that the divine is both indivisible and present in all things without losing its unity. They explore the idea of differentiation within unity and the omnipresence of the divine.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 608
Section 1 1. The integral omnipresence of a unity numerically identical is in fact universally received; for all men instinctively affirm the god in each of us to be one, the same in all. It would be taken as certain if no one asked How or…”
Both passages discuss the concept of unity and the omnipresence of the divine. They explore how the divine unity is manifest in all things while remaining transcendent and indivisible, showing a genuine conceptual parallel across different mystical traditions.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 610
Section 3 3. If this principle is the Authentic Existent and holds unchanging identity, does not go forth from itself, is untouched by any process of becoming or, as we have said, by any situation in place, then it must be always self-gathe…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine as an indivisible unity that is present in all things without being divided or changed. They explore the concept of the One or Godhead being self-enclosed yet omnipresent, influencing all things while remaining transcendent.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 611
Section 4 4. Then consider this god [in man] whom we cannot think to be absent at some point and present at another. All that have insight into the nature of the divine beings hold the omnipresence of this god and of all the gods, and reaso…”
Both passages discuss the omnipresence and unity of the divine, emphasizing that the divine nature is indivisible and pervades all things without losing its integral identity. They share a conceptual parallel in their exploration of the divine unity and its relationship with creation.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 613
Section 6 6. The Intellectual Beings, thus, are multiple and one; in virtue of their infinite nature their unity is a multiplicity, many in one and one over many, a unit-plurality. They act as entire upon entire; even upon the partial thing…”
Both passages discuss the concept of unity and multiplicity within a divine or absolute context, emphasizing how the one can manifest as many without losing its unity. They share a similar metaphysical insight into the nature of being and existence.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 615
Section 8 8. For my part I am satisfied that anyone considering the mode in which Matter participates in the Ideas will be ready enough to accept this tenet of omnipresence in identity, no longer rejecting it as incredible or even difficult…”
Both passages discuss the concept of unity and presence, exploring how a singular, indivisible principle (the Ideas in Plotinus, the Godhead in the second passage) permeates and unifies all things without losing its own unity or causing confusion among the individual entities it unites.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 617
Section 10 10. It remains, then, poised in wisdom within itself; it could not enter into any other; those others look to it and in their longing find it where it is. This is that "Love Waiting at the Door," ever coming up from without, stri…”
Both passages discuss the concept of unity and the indivisible nature of the divine. They explore how the divine remains entire and unified while also being accessible to all, emphasizing the idea of unity without confusion and the transcendence of the divine.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 618
Section 11 11. But how can the unextended reach over the defined extension of the corporeal? How can it, so, maintain itself as a unity, an identity? This is a problem often raised and reason calls vehemently for a solution of the difficult…”
Both passages discuss the nature of a transcendent, unifying principle that is beyond time and space, and how this principle permeates and unites all things without losing its own unity. They explore the concept of an ultimate reality that is both immanent and transcendent, using similar metaphors and philosophical reasoning.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 627
Section 7 7. It is inevitably necessary to think of all as contained within one nature; one nature must hold and encompass all; there cannot be as in the realm of sense thing apart from thing, here a sun and elsewhere something else; all mu…”
Both passages discuss the concept of unity and the indivisible nature of the divine, emphasizing how all things are interconnected within a singular, transcendent principle. They share a mystical perspective on the unity of existence and the divine.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 629
Section 9 9. It remains then to consider whether Being by its distinction produced Number or Number produced that distinction. It is certain that either Number was the cause of Being, movement, rest, identity and difference, or these the ca…”
Both passages explore the relationship between unity and multiplicity, and the nature of the divine as both one and many. They discuss how unity precedes and underlies all beings, and how the divine remains indivisible while manifesting in diverse forms.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 633 (part 1)
Section 13 13. It cannot reasonably be thought that the notion of unity is derived from the object since this is physical- man, animal, even stone, a presentation of that order is something very different from unity [which must be a thing…”
Both passages explore the concept of unity and its primal nature, discussing how unity is a fundamental principle that underlies all existence and how it is perceived by the mind or intellect. They both delve into the idea of unity as a transcendent and fundamental aspect of reality.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 634
Section 14 14. To the argument touching relation we have an answer surely legitimate: The Unity is not of a nature to lose its own manner of being only because something else stands in a state which it does not itself share; to stray from i…”
Both passages discuss the nature of unity and its relationship to multiplicity and division. They explore how unity remains unchanged despite the appearance of duality or plurality, and how unity is a fundamental principle that underlies all existence.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 706
Section 2 2. It may be suggested that, while in the unities of the partial order the essence and the unity are distinct, yet in collective existence, in Real Being, they are identical, so that when we have grasped Being we hold unity; Real…”
Both passages explore the concept of unity and its relationship with being and the divine. They discuss the nature of unity as distinct from multiplicity and the divine as the source of unity and peace, showing a genuine conceptual parallel.
platonism|Plato: Phaedo|Section 1}
For I cannot understand how, when separated from the other, each of them was one and not two, and now, when they are brought together, the mere juxtaposition of them can be the cause of their becoming two: nor can I understand how the divis…”
Both passages explore the nature of unity and division, with Plato's Phaedo discussing the generation and destruction of entities and the role of mind as a disposer, while Plotinus discusses the indivisible division of the Godhead and the unity of all things. Both texts delve into the metaphysical principles underlying the structure of reality.
taoism|The Writings of Chuang Tzu (Inner Chapters)|Book 124 (part 9)
The harmonising of them is to be found in the invisible operation of Heaven, and by following this on into the unlimited past. It is by this method that we can complete our years (without our minds being disturbed) 1 . 'What is meant by h…”
Both passages explore the concept of unity and harmony in the universe, with Passage A discussing the transformation of things and the interconnectedness of existence, while Passage B describes the indivisible unity of the Godhead and its pervasive presence in all things. Both texts emphasize the transcendence of ultimate reality and the interconnectedness of all phenomena.
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter XXII (part 12)
"The cause of all things is neither soul nor intellect; nor has it imagination, opinion, or reason, or intelligence; nor is it reason or intelligence; nor is it spoken or thought. It is neither number, nor order, nor magnitude, nor littlen…”
Both passages explore the concept of divine unity and the interconnectedness of all things. They discuss how the divine transcends human understanding and language, and how all things are united in the divine while maintaining their individuality.
western_esoteric|Transcendental Magic I: The Doctrine (Éliphas Lévi)|Introductionk
The Kabalah alone consecrates the alliance of universal reason and the Divine Word; it establishes by the counterpoise of two forces in apparent opposition, the eternal balance of being; it alone reconciles reason with faith, power with lib…”
Both passages discuss the concept of unity and the divine as a unifying force. Passage A from Kabalah emphasizes the balance and reconciliation of opposites through divine wisdom, while Passage B from Plotinus describes the Godhead as an indivisible unity that permeates all things. Both share the insight of a transcendent unity that binds and harmonizes all existence.
western_esoteric|Transcendental Magic I: The Doctrine (Éliphas Lévi)|2. The Pillars Of The Templec
The undiscerning disciples of Zoroaster divided the duad without referring it to unity, thus separating the Pillars of the Temple and endeavouring to halve God. Conceive the Absolute as two, and you must immediately conceive it as three to…”
Both passages discuss the concept of unity and duality within a divine context, exploring how the Absolute or Godhead can be understood as both one and many. They also delve into the ethical and moral implications of these dualities, though through different mythological and philosophical frameworks.