← Home
Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky) · 56 of 225 · tr. Nicholas Bessaraboff and Claude Bragdon

Chapter VIII (part 2)

______ The formation of perceptions leads to the formation of words , and the appearance of speech . The beginning of speech may appear on the lowest level of psychic life, during the period of living by sensations, and it will become more complex during the period of living by perceptions; p. 82 but unless there be concepts it will not be speech in the true meaning of the word. On the lower levels of psychic life certain sensations can be expressed by certain sounds. Therefore it is possible to express common impressions of horror, anger, pleasure. These sounds may serve as signals of danger, as commands, demands, threats, etc., but it is impossible to say much by means of them. In the further development of speech, if words or sounds express perceptions , as in the case of children, this means that the given sound or the given word designates only that object to which it refers. For each new similar object must exist another new sound, or a new word. If the speaker designates different objects by one and the same sound or word, it means that in his opinion the objects are the same, or that knowingly he is calling different objects by the same name. In either case it will be difficult to understand him, and such speech cannot serve as an example of clear speech. For instance, if a child call a tree by a certain sound or word, having in view that tree only, and not knowing other trees at all, then any new tree which he may see he will call by a new word, or else he will take it for the same tree. The speech in which "words" correspond to perceptions is as it were made up of proper nouns. There are no appellative nouns; and not only substantives, but verbs, adjectives and adverbs have the character of "proper nouns"—that is, they apply to a given action, to a given quality, or to a given property. The appearance of words of a common meaning in human speech signifies the appearance of concepts in consciousness. Speech consists of words, each word expressing a concept. Concept and word are in substance one and the same thing; only the first (the concept) represents, so to speak, the inner side, and the second (the word) the outer side. Or, as says Dr. R. M. Bucke (the author of the book Cosmic Consciousness , about which I shall have much to say later on), "A word (i.e., concept) is the algebraical sign of a thing." It has been noticed thousands of times that the brain of a thinking man does not exceed in size the brain of a non-thinking wild man in anything like the proportion in which the mind of the thinker exceeds the mind of the savage. The reason is that the brain of a Herbert Spencer has very little more work to do than has the brain of a native Australian, for p. 83 this reason, that Spencer does all his characteristic mental work by signs or counters which stand for concepts, while the savage does all or nearly all his by means of cumbersome recepts. The savage is in a position comparable to that of the astronomer who makes his calculations by arithmetic, while Spencer is in the position of one who makes them by algebra. The first will fill many great sheets of paper with figures and go through immense labor; the other will make the same calculations on an envelope and with comparatively little mental work. 1 In our speech words express concepts or ideas. By ideas are meant broader concepts, not representing the group sign of similar perceptions, but embracing various groups of perceptions, or even groups of concepts . Therefore an idea is a complex or an abstract concept.
Themes
Mechanical Humanityanthropology

Gurdjieff and Ouspensky's claim that ordinary human beings live in a state of waking sleep, reacting mechanically without unified will or consciousness, and that the spiritual path begins with recognising this condition.

The passage contrasts the mechanical, perception-based cognition of the 'savage' or child with the conceptual efficiency of the thinker, reflecting Ouspensky's doctrine of ordinary human mechanical functioning.

All passages →
Related passages · 4 parallels
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 381
Section 2 2. But of what nature is this sovereign principle? If material, then definitely it must fall apart; for every material entity, at least, is something put together. If it is not material but belongs to some other Kind, that new sub…”
Both passages discuss the relationship between perception, concepts, and language. They explore how higher cognitive functions like concepts and ideas enable more complex forms of communication and understanding, though they come from different philosophical and mystical traditions.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 385
Section 6 6. It is easy to show that if the Soul were a corporeal entity, there could be no sense-perception, no mental act, no knowledge, no moral excellence, nothing of all that is noble. There can be no perception without a unitary perci…”
Both passages discuss the relationship between perception, language, and consciousness. Passage A explores how concepts and words develop from perceptions, while Passage B examines the necessity of a unitary percipient for sense-perception and knowledge. Both highlight the complexity and unity required for higher cognitive functions.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 390
Section 8 8. C. (11) We come to the theory that this pneuma is an earlier form, one which on entering the cold and being tempered by it develops into soul by growing finer under that new condition. This is absurd at the start, since many li…”
Both passages explore the relationship between perception, language, and consciousness. Passage A discusses how concepts and words develop from perceptions, while Passage B examines the necessity of a unitary percipient for sense-perception and knowledge. Both highlight the importance of unity in cognition and the role of abstract concepts in higher mental functions.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 602
Section 12 12. Think of a sound passing through the air and carrying a word; an ear within range catches and comprehends; and the sound and word will strike upon any other ear you may imagine within the intervening void, upon any that atten…”
Both passages explore the relationship between language, perception, and consciousness. Passage A discusses the evolution of speech from sensations to concepts, while Passage B uses the analogy of sound and vision to explain the omnipresence of the soul, both touching on the nature of perception and the unity of experience.