← Home
The Writings of Chuang Tzu (Inner Chapters) · 54 of 57 · tr. James Legge

Book 129 (part 2)

Yang Dze-kü 5 , having an interview with Lao Tan, said to him, 'Here is a man, alert and vigorous p. 262 in responding to all matters 1 , clearsighted and widely intelligent, and an unwearied student of the Tâo;--can he be compared to one of the intelligent kings?' The reply was, 'Such a man is to one of the intelligent kings but as the bustling underling of a court who toils his body and distresses his mind with his various contrivances 2 . And moreover, it is the beauty of the skins of the tiger and leopard which makes men hunt them; the agility of the monkey, or (the sagacity of) the dog that catches the yak, which make men lead them in strings; but can one similarly endowed be compared to the intelligent kings?' Yang dze-kü looked discomposed and said, 'I venture to ask you what the government of the intelligent kings is.' Lâo Tan replied, 'In the governing of the intelligent kings, their services overspread all under the sky, but they did not seem to consider it as proceeding from themselves; their transforming influence reached to all things, but the people did not refer it to them with hope. No one could tell the name of their agency, but they made men and things be joyful in themselves. Where they took their stand could not be fathomed, and they found their enjoyment in (the realm of) nonentity.' 5. In Käng there was a mysterious wizard 3 called p. 263 Ki-hsien. He knew all about the deaths and births of men, their preservation and ruin, their misery and happiness, and whether their lives would be long or short, foretelling the year, the month, the decade and the day like a spirit. When the people of Käng saw him, they all ran out of his way. Lieh-dze went to see him, and was fascinated 1 by him. Returning, he told Hû-dze of his interview, and said, 'I considered your doctrine, my master, to be perfect, but I have found another which is superior to it.' Hû-dze 2 replied, 'I have communicated to you but the outward letter of my doctrine, and have not communicated its reality and spirit; and do you think that you are in possession of it? However many hens there be, if there be not the cock among them, how should they lay (real) eggs 3 ? When you confront the world with your doctrine, you are sure to show in your countenance (all that is in your mind) 4 , and so enable (this) man to succeed in interpreting your physiognomy. Try and come to me with him, that I may show myself to him.' On the morrow, accordingly, Lieh-dze came with the man and saw Ha-dze. When they went out, the p. 264 wizard said, 'Alas! your master is a dead man. He will not live;--not for ten days more! I saw something strange about him;--I saw the ashes (of his life) all slaked with water!' When Lieh-dze reentered, he wept till the front of his jacket was wet with his tears, and told Hû-dze what the man had said. Hû-dze said, 'I showed myself to him with the forms of (vegetation beneath) the earth. There were the sprouts indeed, but without (any appearance of) growth or regularity:--he seemed to see me with the springs of my (vital) power closed up. Try and come to me with him again.' Next day, accordingly, Lieh-dze brought the man again and saw Hû-dze.
Themes
Inner Silencepraxis

The practice of stilling the mind and speech to open receptivity to divine knowledge or presence.

[auto] Finding enjoyment in pure simplicity and idle indifference describes a state of mental stillness and quietude.

All passages →
Kingdom Withinanthropology

The claim that the divine realm is present inside the individual, accessible without external mediation.

[auto] The passage asserts that governing the world begins with the internal state of one's own mind.

All passages →
Mystical Unionsoteriology

The merging of the individual soul or self with the divine, transcending personal identity.

[auto] The instruction to blend oneself with the primary ether signifies a merging of self with the divine or cosmic principle.

All passages →
Rejection Of Hypocrisyethics

Critique of outward religious observance that lacks inner transformation; form without substance.

[auto] Lao Tan critiques the clever student as merely a bustling underling, contrasting outward activity with true sagehood.

All passages →
Return To Sourcesoteriology

The soul's journey back to its divine origin, reversing the fall into matter through stages of purification or illumination.

[auto] The text advises blending with the primary ether, implying a return to the fundamental source of existence.

All passages →
Unity Of Beingtheology

The doctrine that all existence is ultimately one substance or one divine reality; non-duality as a theological claim.

[auto] Allowing all things to take their natural course suggests an underlying non-dual reality where self and world are connected.

All passages →
Related passages · 4 parallels
buddhism|Vajrakkhedika (Diamond Cutter)|Section 1g
Therefore he is called an Anâgâmin.' Bhagavat said: 'What do you think, O Subhûti, does an Arhat think in this wise: The fruit of an Arhat has been obtained by me?' Subhûti said: 'Not indeed, O Bhagavat, an Arhat does not think in this wise…”
Both passages emphasize the importance of non-attachment and the absence of a fixed self or ego in achieving a higher state of being or enlightenment. They both advocate for a state of being where one does not claim personal achievement or identity, aligning with the mystical traditions of Taoism and Buddhism respectively.
jewish_mysticism|The Book of Concealed Mystery (Siphra Dtzenioutha)|1e
31: "And He was wise above every man." Because these are not classed with man. 21. (But when it is said) "And the Tetragrammaton gave him wisdom," then is understood the supernal He . (Because he gave unto him the influx of the wisdom of…”
Both passages discuss the nature of wisdom and governance, emphasizing the importance of aligning with a higher, transcendent principle. They highlight the limitations of human understanding and the need for a deeper, more mystical insight to achieve true wisdom and effective governance.
platonism|Plato: Phaedo|Section 1d
Socrates replied: And have you, Cebes and Simmias, who are acquainted with Philolaus, never heard him speak of this? I never understood him, Socrates. My words, too, are only an echo; but I am very willing to say what I have heard: and in…”
Both passages explore the theme of wisdom and the nature of the wise person's relationship to the divine or the Tao. They discuss the idea of a higher power or principle governing life and the appropriate attitude towards it, though they do so within different cultural and philosophical contexts.
platonism|Plato: Republic|Section 1a
SOCRATES - ADEIMANTUS Here Adeimantus interposed and said: To these statements, Socrates, no one can offer a reply; but when you talk in this way, a strange feeling passes over the minds of your hearers: They fancy that they are led astray…”
Both passages discuss the nature of wisdom and the challenges faced by wise individuals in society. They highlight the disconnect between societal perceptions and the true nature of wisdom, though they do so within different cultural and philosophical contexts.