← Home
Tao Te Ching · 1 of 81 · tr. James Legge

Chapter 1

The Tao that can be trodden is not the enduring and unchanging Tao. The name that can be named is not the enduring and unchanging name. (Conceived of as) having no name, it is the Originator of heaven and earth; (conceived of as) having a name, it is the Mother of all things. Always without desire we must be found, If its deep mystery we would sound; But if desire always within us be, Its outer fringe is all that we shall see. Under these two aspects, it is really the same; but as development takes place, it receives the different names. Together we call them the Mystery. Where the Mystery is the deepest is the gate of all that is subtle and wonderful.
Themes
Asha Cosmic Ordercosmology

Truth as the fundamental structure of reality.

The Tao functions as a fundamental ordering principle similar to the Zoroastrian concept of truth and order.

All passages →
Detachment Gelassenheitpraxis

Eckhart's Abgeschiedenheit/Gelassenheit — radical letting-go of will, image, and grasping that opens the soul to God; distinct from inner_silence (quietness) and from material renunciation, and adjacent to Sufi tark and Buddhist non-grasping as a practice rather than a metaphysical claim.

The instruction to be 'without desire' aligns with the practice of letting go of grasping to open receptivity.

All passages →
Meditationpraxis

Disciplined inward attention — sitting, focused, or open-awareness practice — as a stand-alone term that umbrellas active_contemplation, inner_silence, and dhyana-style sitting.

The state required to 'sound' the mystery implies a disciplined inward attention.

All passages →
Sacred Namestheology

Divine names or formulas that carry ontological power, used in prayer, liturgy, or magical practice.

The text discusses the limits and power of naming the divine principle.

All passages →
Sunyata Emptinesssoteriology

The Buddhist doctrine that all phenomena lack independent self-nature; emptiness as the positive recognition that things arise only in dependence on conditions — distinct from kenoma's mere deficiency.

The concept of 'having no name' resonates with the Buddhist doctrine of emptiness despite distinct traditions.

All passages →
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

[auto] The passage defines the Tao primarily by negation, stating it cannot be trodden or named.

All passages →
Divine Hiddennesstheology

The supreme God's radical concealment beyond ordinary knowledge or perception; the Hidden Father.

[auto] It emphasizes the deep mystery and ineffability of the Originator beyond ordinary perception.

All passages →
Divine Simplicitytheology

The doctrine that God has no parts, divisions, or composite attributes; pure undivided being.

[auto] The Tao is described as fundamentally one despite receiving different names during development.

All passages →
Gnosis Direct Knowledgesoteriology

Salvation through direct experiential knowledge of the divine nature, not through faith, ritual, or moral works alone.

[auto] Understanding the deep mystery requires a state of being without desire rather than intellectual accumulation.

All passages →
Hidden Sayingssoteriology

Esoteric teachings reserved for those ready to receive them; outer meaning conceals an inner liberating truth.

[auto] It refers to a Mystery and a gate to the subtle that is not immediately apparent.

All passages →
Inner Silencepraxis

The practice of stilling the mind and speech to open receptivity to divine knowledge or presence.

[auto] Being without desire is prescribed as the condition for sounding the deep mystery.

All passages →
Monadcosmology

The absolutely simple, undivided first principle from which all multiplicity and existence flows.

[auto] The Tao is presented as the singular, undivided Originator of heaven and earth.

All passages →
Mystical Unionsoteriology

The merging of the individual soul or self with the divine, transcending personal identity.

[auto] The goal implies merging with or understanding the Mystery that encompasses all things.

All passages →
Opposites Transcendedanthropology

The dissolution of binary oppositions (male/female, inner/outer, above/below) as a mark of spiritual completion.

[auto] The text states that two aspects are really the same, dissolving binary opposition.

All passages →
Paradox As Teachingethics

Using apparent contradiction, reversal, or riddle to destabilise ordinary understanding and induce insight.

[auto] It employs contradictions like the named/unnamed and same/different to convey truth.

All passages →
Unity Of Beingtheology

The doctrine that all existence is ultimately one substance or one divine reality; non-duality as a theological claim.

[auto] It asserts that despite different names and aspects, the underlying reality is the same.

All passages →
Wu Weipraxis

Effortless action aligned with the spontaneous flow of the Dao; non-coercive, non-striving conduct that yields results without forcing — the sage acts without acting.

[auto] The instruction to be 'without desire' is the foundational mental state for effortless action aligned with the Dao.

All passages →
Related passages · 2 parallels
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 13, Section 1d
And hence, when we speak of the All-Transcendent Godhead as an Unity and a Trinity, It is not an Unity or a Trinity such as can be known by us or any other creature, though to express the truth of Its utter Self-Union and Its Divine Fecundi…”
Both passages discuss the ineffable nature of the divine, emphasizing that the ultimate reality transcends names and human comprehension. They share a mystical approach to describing the divine as beyond human language and understanding.
hermeticism|Corpus Hermeticum 2: The Serapeum|Section 1d
Not only, then, is God not understood by all, but both unto the gods and some of the men they out of ignorance do give the name of Good, though they can never either be or become Good. For they are very different from God, while Good can n…”
Both passages explore the nature of the divine or ultimate reality, emphasizing its ineffable and transcendent aspects. They also discuss the relationship between the divine and the creation of all things, highlighting the mystery and subtlety of these concepts.