← Home
Plato: Phaedo · 30 of 44 · tr. Benjamin Jowett

Section 1~

I might compare him to a person who began by maintaining generally that mind is the cause of the actions of Socrates, but who, when he endeavored to explain the causes of my several actions in detail, went on to show that I sit here because my body is made up of bones and muscles; and the bones, as he would say, are hard and have ligaments which divide them, and the muscles are elastic, and they cover the bones, which have also a covering or environment of flesh and skin which contains them; and as the bones are lifted at their joints by the contraction or relaxation of the muscles, I am able to bend my limbs, and this is why I am sitting here in a curved posture: that is what he would say, and he would have a similar explanation of my talking to you, which he would attribute to sound, and air, and hearing, and he would assign ten thousand other causes of the same sort, forgetting to mention the true cause, which is that the Athenians have thought fit to condemn me, and accordingly I have thought it better and more right to remain here and undergo my sentence; for I am inclined to think that these muscles and bones of mine would have gone off to Megara or Boeotia-by the dog of Egypt they would, if they had been guided only by their own idea of what was best, and if I had not chosen as the better and nobler part, instead of playing truant and running away, to undergo any punishment which the State inflicts. There is surely a strange confusion of causes and conditions in all this. It may be said, indeed, that without bones and muscles and the other parts of the body I cannot execute my purposes. But to say that I do as I do because of them, and that this is the way in which mind acts, and not from the choice of the best, is a very careless and idle mode of speaking. I wonder that they cannot distinguish the cause from the condition, which the many, feeling about in the dark, are always mistaking and misnaming. And thus one man makes a vortex all round and steadies the earth by the heaven; another gives the air as a support to the earth, which is a sort of broad trough. Any power which in disposing them as they are disposes them for the best never enters into their minds, nor do they imagine that there is any superhuman strength in that; they rather expect to find another Atlas of the world who is stronger and more everlasting and more containing than the good is, and are clearly of opinion that the obligatory and containing power of the good is as nothing; and yet this is the principle which I would fain learn if anyone would teach me. But as I have failed either to discover myself or to learn of anyone else, the nature of the best, I will exhibit to you, if you like, what I have found to be the second best mode of inquiring into the cause. I should very much like to hear that, he replied. Socrates proceeded: I thought that as I had failed in the contemplation of true existence, I ought to be careful that I did not lose the eye of my soul; as people may injure their bodily eye by observing and gazing on the sun during an eclipse, unless they take the precaution of only looking at the image reflected in the water, or in some similar medium. That occurred to me, and I was afraid that my soul might be blinded altogether if I looked at things with my eyes or tried by the help of the senses to apprehend them. And I thought that I had better have recourse to ideas, and seek in them the truth of existence.
Themes
Active Contemplationpraxis

A form of meditation that uses imagery, imagination, or symbolic thought rather than purely empty stillness.

Socrates describes a method of inquiry that involves seeking truth through ideas rather than sensory observation.

All passages →
Anamnesissoteriology

Platonic recollection: knowledge as the soul's recovery of what it knew before birth, with learning as remembering rather than acquisition.

The passage explicitly references the Platonic method of recollection ('I thought that I had better have recourse to ideas'), aligning with the concept of knowledge as recovery.

All passages →
Body As Obstacleanthropology

The material body viewed as a prison, tomb, or source of error that hinders spiritual knowledge and return.

Socrates warns that relying on bodily parts and senses can blind the soul and obscure the true cause of actions.

All passages →
Cosmic Dualismtheology

Ontological opposition between two primal principles (light/darkness, truth/lie, spirit/matter) as the fundamental structure of reality.

The text contrasts the 'true cause' with 'conditions' like bones and muscles, implying a distinction between material reality and higher truth.

All passages →
Detachment Gelassenheitpraxis

Eckhart's Abgeschiedenheit/Gelassenheit — radical letting-go of will, image, and grasping that opens the soul to God; distinct from inner_silence (quietness) and from material renunciation, and adjacent to Sufi tark and Buddhist non-grasping as a practice rather than a metaphysical claim.

Socrates advocates for letting go of bodily desires and conditions to avoid being blinded by them.

All passages →
Divine Hiddennesstheology

The supreme God's radical concealment beyond ordinary knowledge or perception; the Hidden Father.

The text describes the true cause as a 'superhuman strength' that is not felt or imagined by ordinary people.

All passages →
Evil As Privationtheology

Augustinian and Plotinian doctrine that evil has no positive being of its own but is a lack, distortion, or absence of the good — denying ontological dualism while preserving moral seriousness.

The passage argues that the true cause of actions (the good) is often forgotten or misnamed, implying evil results from this ignorance.

All passages →
Gnosis Direct Knowledgesoteriology

Salvation through direct experiential knowledge of the divine nature, not through faith, ritual, or moral works alone.

The passage emphasizes seeking truth through direct apprehension of ideas rather than sensory observation.

All passages →
Inner Lightanthropology

The divine spark or luminous quality residing within the human person, potentially recognisable through introspection.

Socrates warns that gazing on the sun of truth can blind the soul unless viewed through a medium like water.

All passages →
Kingdom Withinanthropology

The claim that the divine realm is present inside the individual, accessible without external mediation.

The true cause is attributed to the 'mind' and 'soul' rather than external conditions.

All passages →
Meditationpraxis

Disciplined inward attention — sitting, focused, or open-awareness practice — as a stand-alone term that umbrellas active_contemplation, inner_silence, and dhyana-style sitting.

Socrates proposes a disciplined method of inquiry involving contemplation and avoiding sensory gazing to preserve the soul's eye.

All passages →
Mystical Unionsoteriology

The merging of the individual soul or self with the divine, transcending personal identity.

The goal is to apprehend the nature of the best cause, implying a union with the divine order.

All passages →
Paradox As Teachingethics

Using apparent contradiction, reversal, or riddle to destabilise ordinary understanding and induce insight.

Socrates uses the analogy of a person attributing actions to bones and muscles rather than mind to illustrate a deeper truth about causality.

All passages →
Return To Sourcesoteriology

The soul's journey back to its divine origin, reversing the fall into matter through stages of purification or illumination.

The method aims to preserve the soul's eye from being blinded by material conditions and return it to true knowledge.

All passages →
Self Knowledgesoteriology

The recognition of one's own true divine nature as the primary path to liberation; 'know thyself' as soteriology.

Socrates prioritizes knowing the nature of the best cause over merely understanding bodily mechanics.

All passages →
Related passages · 5 parallels
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 2, Section 1h
Even so if any one says that Very Life lives, or that Very Light is enlightened, he will be wrong (according to my view) unless, perchance, he were to use these terms in a different sense from the ordinary one to mean that the qualities of…”
Both passages discuss the nature of causality and the role of higher principles (mind/soul in Plato, Divine in Augustine) in governing actions and existence. They emphasize the distinction between superficial causes and true, underlying causes.
hermeticism|Corpus Hermeticum 10: The Sermon on the Mount|Section 1d
Spirit pervading [body] by means of veins and arteries and blood, bestows upon the living creature motion, and as it were doth bear it in a way. For this cause some do think the soul is blood, in that they do mistake its nature, not knowin…”
Both passages explore the relationship between the mind/soul and the physical body, emphasizing the distinction between the true cause (mind/soul) and the conditions (physical body). They also discuss the nature of existence and the higher principles guiding the universe.
taoism|The Writings of Chuang Tzu (Inner Chapters)|Book 125 (part 2)
or from Man?' Then he added 2 , 'It must be from Heaven, and not from Man. Heaven's making of this man caused him to have but one foot. In the person of man, each foot has its marrow. By this I know that his peculiarity is from Heaven, a…”
Both passages explore the distinction between the higher, spiritual causes of actions and events and the lower, material conditions. They emphasize the importance of recognizing the true, often divine or transcendent, causes behind phenomena rather than attributing them solely to physical or human factors.
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter XVIII (part 2)
Evolutionists, followers of Darwin, say that the struggle for existence and the selection of the fittest created the mind and feeling of contemporary man—that mind and feeling SERVE LIFE, preserve the life of separate individuals and of the…”
Both passages discuss the distinction between superficial causes and deeper, more fundamental causes or principles. Plato's Socrates argues for the primacy of the mind and the good as the true causes of actions, while the second passage discusses the limitations of studying parts rather than wholes and the underlying rationality of life.
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter XXII (part 13)
Then the understanding of such a man receives from the Holy Spirit the highest and hidden mysteries which according to the divine Paul, neither the human eye can understand nor the human reason comprehend unaided. (Ii Corinthians ii, 9).…”
Both passages explore the limitations of human understanding and the need to look beyond the physical or rational to grasp higher truths. Plato discusses the distinction between true causes and conditions, advocating for the contemplation of ideas, while the Christian mystic describes the transformation of human reason when united with the Divine, emphasizing the ineffable nature of divine mysteries.