← Home
Select Works of Plotinus · 436 of 752 · tr. Thomas Taylor

Select Works, Section 414

Section 5 5. How then can a multitude of essential beings be really one? Obviously either the one essence will be entire in all, or the many will rise from a one which remains unaltered and yet includes the one- many in virtue of giving itself, without self-abandonment, to its own multiplication. It is competent thus to give and remain, because while it penetrates all things it can never itself be sundered: this is an identity in variety. There is no reason for dismissing this explanation: we may think of a science with its constituents standing as one total, the source of all those various elements: again, there is the seed, a whole, producing those new parts in which it comes to its division; each of the new growths is a whole while the whole remains undiminished: only the material element is under the mode of part, and all the multiplicity remains an entire identity still. It may be objected that in the case of science the constituents are not each the whole. But even in the science, while the constituent selected for handling to meet a particular need is present actually and takes the lead, still all the other constituents accompany it in a potential presence, so that the whole is in every part: only in this sense [of particular attention] is the whole science distinguished from the part: all, we may say, is here simultaneously effected: each part is at your disposal as you choose to take it; the part invites the immediate interest, but its value consists in its approach to the whole. The detail cannot be considered as something separate from the entire body of speculation: so treated it would have no technical or scientific value; it would be childish divagation. The one detail, when it is a matter of science, potentially includes all. Grasping one such constituent of his science, the expert deduces the rest by force of sequence. [As a further illustration of unity in plurality] the geometrician, in his analysis, shows that the single proposition includes all the items that go to constitute it and all the propositions which can be developed from it. It is our feebleness that leads to doubt in these matters; the body obscures the truth, but There all stands out clear and separate.
Themes
Divine Providencetheology

Pronoia — the doctrine that the divine actively orders the unfolding of the cosmos and human affairs toward intelligible ends, against pure chance or blind necessity.

The Soul of the All is described as governing the universe through intellectual act rather than calculation.

All passages →
Evil As Privationtheology

Augustinian and Plotinian doctrine that evil has no positive being of its own but is a lack, distortion, or absence of the good — denying ontological dualism while preserving moral seriousness.

The lower sphere is characterized as partial, deficient, and exposed to alien influences rather than possessing positive evil.

All passages →
Gnosis Direct Knowledgesoteriology

Salvation through direct experiential knowledge of the divine nature, not through faith, ritual, or moral works alone.

Knowledge is described as the Intellectual Act reaching downward or being perceived by the central faculty rather than through sensation.

All passages →
Microcosm Macrocosmcosmology

The human being as a small-scale image of the entire cosmos; the body, soul, and intellect mirroring the structure of the heavens and the divine — distinct from correspondence in that it makes the human the privileged mirror.

The text states that every individual soul mirrors the structure of the Soul of the All which governs the universe.

All passages →
Return To Sourcesoteriology

The soul's journey back to its divine origin, reversing the fall into matter through stages of purification or illumination.

The passage implies a need to access the upper phase of the soul which is continuously in the Intellectual Realm.

All passages →
Separation From Sourcesoteriology

The felt condition of exile from one's divine origin — Rumi's reed flute torn from its bed, Plotinus's 'we have forgotten,' the Gnostic forgetfulness; the affective wound that complements return_to_source and gives the return its motive.

The embodied soul is described as blind to the upper phase and preoccupied by sensation, indicating a state of separation.

All passages →
Tripartite Soulanthropology

Division of the human being into three principles: spirit (pneuma), soul (psyche), and body/matter (hyle or soma).

The text explicitly distinguishes between the body side, the soul, and the Intellectual-Principle side.

All passages →
Active Contemplationpraxis

A form of meditation that uses imagery, imagination, or symbolic thought rather than purely empty stillness.

[auto] The passage references the upper phase holding objects in contemplation which must reach downward to be known.

All passages →
Body As Obstacleanthropology

The material body viewed as a prison, tomb, or source of error that hinders spiritual knowledge and return.

[auto] Mastery by the sense sphere is described as keeping the individual blind to higher contemplation.

All passages →
Divine Sparkscosmology

Fragments of divine light or spirit trapped inside material bodies, awaiting liberation and return to their source.

[auto] It states that part of the human soul remains continuously in the Intellectual Realm, akin to a divine fragment within.

All passages →
Emanation Hierarchycosmology

A chain of divine beings or principles flowing downward from a single transcendent source (the One or the Father), each level less perfect than the one above.

[auto] The passage distinguishes between the Intellectual Realm and the sphere of sense, implying a hierarchical structure of being.

All passages →
Kingdom Withinanthropology

The claim that the divine realm is present inside the individual, accessible without external mediation.

[auto] It asserts that the Intellectual Realm is present within the human soul even while in the material world.

All passages →
Self Knowledgesoteriology

The recognition of one's own true divine nature as the primary path to liberation; 'know thyself' as soteriology.

[auto] The text emphasizes making internal desires and activities fully known to the central faculty of perception.

All passages →
Related passages · 7 parallels
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 11, Section 1b
Plotinus says the Godhead is indivisibly divided. doth not leave Its own Unity, but, even in the act of going forth to all things, remains entirely within Itself through the excess of that all-transcendent Unity: concerning these things ‘t…”
Both passages discuss the concept of unity and multiplicity, exploring how a single essence can be present in many forms without being divided. They both use examples and analogies to illustrate the idea of an indivisible unity that permeates all things.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 13, Section 1c
Emily Brontë: “Every existence would exist in Thee.”) And if all things be conceived as being ultimately unified with each other, then all things taken as a whole are One. 507 507 All things possess the same Super-Essence, and that is why…”
Both passages explore the concept of unity within multiplicity, discussing how a single essence can be present in many forms without being divided. They both use examples and analogies to illustrate the idea of an underlying unity that encompasses all things.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 9 (part 1)
p. 180 CHAPTER IX. GENERATION. "Let every Brahman, with fixed attention, consider all nature, both visible and invisible, as existing in the Divine Spirit. For when he contemplates the boundless universe in the Divine Spirit, he cannot…”
Both passages discuss the dual nature of the soul, with one part connected to the divine or intellectual realm and the other part engaged with the material or sensory world. They also explore the idea that the soul's connection to the higher realm can be obscured or weakened by its engagement with the lower realm.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 11 (part 7)
48.) "The soul and the Word are not one or one being. The soul is born from the centre of nature, from the essences, and belongs to the body, for she issues from the essences of the body, and attracts to herself the body; but the Word is f…”
Both passages discuss the relationship between the soul and a higher, divine principle. Plotinus describes the soul's connection to the Intellectual Realm, while the second passage discusses the soul's relationship with the Word. Both emphasize the soul's dual nature and its connection to a higher reality.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 14 (part 8)
, in the heavenly essentiality (Devachan)—cannot be disturbed by anybody, unless they should wish it themselves, in case that they were very favourably inclined towards some particular soul in harmony with their own. They do not trouble th…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the soul and its connection to higher realms. They describe a part of the soul that remains connected to the divine or intellectual realm while another part is engaged with the material world. The passages also touch on the idea of higher souls being undisturbed by earthly concerns unless they choose to be.
platonism|Plato: Timaeus|Section 1y
He, however, who raises the question whether they are to be truly regarded as one or five, takes up a more reasonable position. Arguing from probabilities, I am of opinion that they are one; another, regarding the question from another poi…”
Both passages explore the concept of unity within multiplicity, discussing how a single essence or principle can manifest in various forms without losing its fundamental unity. Passage A uses the example of a science and its constituents, while Passage B discusses the elemental forms and their relationships, but both convey the idea of an underlying unity in diverse phenomena.
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter XIX (part 7)
In the reduction of your soul to its simplest self, its divine essence, you realize this union—this identity. But this sublime condition is not of permanent duration. It is only now and then that we can enjoy this elevation above the limi…”
Both passages discuss the concept of the soul's union with the divine or the Intellectual Realm, emphasizing the transcendence of the individual self and the attainment of higher states of consciousness. They share a mystical perspective on the nature of reality and the soul's relationship to it.