← Home
Select Works of Plotinus · 416 of 752 · tr. Thomas Taylor

Select Works, Section 392 (part 2)

The other order, the entire corporeal Kind, is process; it appears and it perishes; in reality it never possesses Being, but is merely protected, in so far as it has the capacity, by participating in what authentically is.
Themes
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

The nature of the soul and quality is defined largely by what it is not (not body, not quantity).

All passages →
Divine Providencetheology

Pronoia — the doctrine that the divine actively orders the unfolding of the cosmos and human affairs toward intelligible ends, against pure chance or blind necessity.

The text argues that bodies possess efficiency through incorporeal powers operating within them, implying an active divine ordering principle governing material existence.

All passages →
Divine Simplicitytheology

The doctrine that God has no parts, divisions, or composite attributes; pure undivided being.

The argument that quality remains intact when a body is fragmented illustrates the principle of non-composite simplicity versus material divisibility.

All passages →
Logoscosmology

The divine reason, word, or ordering principle through which the universe was created; mediates between the transcendent God and the material world.

The passage explicitly identifies 'Reason-Principles' (Logoi) as the entrants that provide variety and efficiency to matter, mediating between the unembodied and the bodily.

All passages →
Tripartite Soulanthropology

Division of the human being into three principles: spirit (pneuma), soul (psyche), and body/matter (hyle or soma).

The passage distinguishes between the soul, pneuma/blood, and body, clarifying that neither pneuma nor blood constitutes the soul which pervades the entire being.

All passages →
Body As Obstacleanthropology

The material body viewed as a prison, tomb, or source of error that hinders spiritual knowledge and return.

[auto] The text argues against classifying the soul with the body, implying the body is a lower order that cannot contain true soul efficacy.

All passages →
Cosmic Dualismtheology

Ontological opposition between two primal principles (light/darkness, truth/lie, spirit/matter) as the fundamental structure of reality.

[auto] It establishes an ontological distinction between the material body (quantity) and the incorporeal soul/powers (quality/intellection).

All passages →
Emanation Hierarchycosmology

A chain of divine beings or principles flowing downward from a single transcendent source (the One or the Father), each level less perfect than the one above.

[auto] The passage distinguishes a 'higher order' of incorporeal powers that operate within bodies, implying a hierarchical structure of being where the soul governs the body.

All passages →
Related passages · 5 parallels
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 9 (part 7)
Even in its best aspect the performance is disgusting before the sanctity of that which is divine, it having been caused by sin in consequence of primordial man's degradation, but being patiently submitted to by that which is divine in man,…”
Both passages discuss the distinction between the corporeal and incorporeal aspects of existence, emphasizing the higher, non-physical nature of the soul or divine principles. They both argue for the existence of non-material powers that govern and influence the material world.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 11 (part 7)
48.) "The soul and the Word are not one or one being. The soul is born from the centre of nature, from the essences, and belongs to the body, for she issues from the essences of the body, and attracts to herself the body; but the Word is f…”
Both passages discuss the relationship between the soul and higher, incorporeal principles. Plotinus argues for the distinction between the soul's powers and bodily functions, while Jakob Boehme describes the interaction between the soul and the divine Word, emphasizing their distinct yet interconnected nature.
hermeticism|Corpus Hermeticum 10: The Sermon on the Mount|Section 1c
For that the soul who hath no knowledge of the things that are, or knowledge of their nature, or of Good, is blinded by the body's passions and tossed about. This wretched soul, not knowing what she is, becomes the slave of bodies of stran…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the soul and its relationship to the body, emphasizing the incorporeal and higher nature of the soul. They both argue for the distinction between the bodily and the incorporeal, though in different contexts and with different terminologies.
hermeticism|Corpus Hermeticum 10: The Sermon on the Mount|Section 1d
Spirit pervading [body] by means of veins and arteries and blood, bestows upon the living creature motion, and as it were doth bear it in a way. For this cause some do think the soul is blood, in that they do mistake its nature, not knowin…”
Both passages discuss the relationship between the soul, body, and higher principles. Plotinus argues for the distinction between the incorporeal powers of the soul and the physical attributes of the body, while Hermes Trismegistus describes the hierarchical relationship between mind, reason, soul, spirit, and body. Both emphasize the non-material nature of higher principles and their influence on the physical realm.
hermeticism|Corpus Hermeticum 11: The Hymn|Section 1c
It must, then, be that such a one as this must be some one who's wholly One. 9. For as the many motions of them [all] are different, and as their bodies are not like, yet has one speed been ordered for them all, it is impossible that ther…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the soul and its relationship to the body, emphasizing the distinction between the incorporeal and corporeal realms. They both argue for the existence of a higher, non-physical principle that governs the physical world.