← Home
Select Works of Plotinus · 405 of 752 · tr. Thomas Taylor

Select Works, Section 382

Section 3 3. Anyone who rejects this view, and holds that either atoms or some entities void of part coming together produce soul, is refuted by the very unity of soul and by the prevailing sympathy as much as by the very coherence of the constituents. Bodily materials, in nature repugnant to unification and to sensation, could never produce unity or self-sensitiveness, and soul is self-sensitive. And, again, constituents void of part could never produce body or bulk. Perhaps we will be asked to consider body as a simple entity [disregarding the question of any constituent elements]: they will tell us, then, that no doubt, as purely material, it cannot have a self-springing life- since matter is without quality- but that life is introduced by the fact that the Matter is brought to order under Forming-Idea. But if by this Forming-Idea they mean an essential, a real being, then it is not the conjoint of body and idea that constitutes soul: it must be one of the two items and that one, being [by hypothesis] outside of the Matter, cannot be body: to make it body would simply force us to repeat our former analysis. If on the contrary they do not mean by this Forming-Idea a real being, but some condition or modification of the Matter, they must tell us how and whence this modification, with resultant life, can have found the way into the Matter: for very certainly Matter does not mould itself to pattern or bring itself to life. It becomes clear that since neither Matter nor body in any mode has this power, life must be brought upon the stage by some directing principle external and transcendent to all that is corporeal. In fact, body itself could not exist in any form if soul-power did not: body passes; dissolution is in its very nature; all would disappear in a twinkling if all were body. It is no help to erect some one mode of body into soul; made of the same Matter as the rest, this soul body would fall under the same fate: of course it could never really exist: the universe of things would halt at the material, failing something to bring Matter to shape. Nay more: Matter itself could not exist: the totality of things in this sphere is dissolved if it be made to depend upon the coherence of a body which, though elevated to the nominal rank of "soul," remains air, fleeting breath [the Stoic pneuma, rarefied matter, "spirit" in the lower sense], whose very unity is not drawn from itself. All bodies are in ceaseless process of dissolution; how can the kosmos be made over to any one of them without being turned into a senseless haphazard drift? This pneuma- orderless except under soul- how can it contain order, reason, intelligence? But: given soul, all these material things become its collaborators towards the coherence of the kosmos and of every living being, all the qualities of all the separate objects converging to the purposes of the universe: failing soul in the things of the universe, they could not even exist, much less play their ordered parts.
Themes
Divine Lighttheology

The uncreated luminous quality of the divine, sometimes experienced directly in mystical states; illumination as revelation.

[auto] The ascent is characterized by rising to a greater brilliance and radiant mode of being.

All passages →
Emanation Hierarchycosmology

A chain of divine beings or principles flowing downward from a single transcendent source (the One or the Father), each level less perfect than the one above.

[auto] The text positions the Soul midway between the Intellectual Realm and the realm of sense, implying a hierarchical structure of being.

All passages →
Gnosis Direct Knowledgesoteriology

Salvation through direct experiential knowledge of the divine nature, not through faith, ritual, or moral works alone.

[auto] Knowledge of the Intellectual Realm is described as intuition by memory and natural identity rather than external acquisition.

All passages →
Inner Lightanthropology

The divine spark or luminous quality residing within the human person, potentially recognisable through introspection.

[auto] The soul possesses a capacity for greater brilliance and radiant mode that awakens from latency.

All passages →
Kingdom Withinanthropology

The claim that the divine realm is present inside the individual, accessible without external mediation.

[auto] The Intellectual Realm is presented as the Soul's natural vision and intrinsic nature rather than an external object.

All passages →
Logoscosmology

The divine reason, word, or ordering principle through which the universe was created; mediates between the transcendent God and the material world.

[auto] The passage identifies the Soul as the Reason-Principle of the universe that mediates between higher and lower orders.

All passages →
Mystical Unionsoteriology

The merging of the individual soul or self with the divine, transcending personal identity.

[auto] The Soul's knowledge involves becoming one with the Intellectual Beings, described as itself in a more radiant mode.

All passages →
Return To Sourcesoteriology

The soul's journey back to its divine origin, reversing the fall into matter through stages of purification or illumination.

[auto] The text describes a progress from latency to brilliance, indicating an upward movement toward the divine origin.

All passages →
Self Knowledgesoteriology

The recognition of one's own true divine nature as the primary path to liberation; 'know thyself' as soteriology.

[auto] Understanding the higher realm is equated with knowing oneself through natural identity with those beings.

All passages →
Spiritual Ascentpraxis

A staged journey of the soul upward through heavenly realms or levels of being toward the divine source.

[auto] The central movement described is the soul rising from a duller pitch to greater brilliance in an awakening progress.

All passages →
Unity Of Beingtheology

The doctrine that all existence is ultimately one substance or one divine reality; non-duality as a theological claim.

[auto] The passage asserts a natural identity between the Soul and the Intellectual Beings, suggesting an underlying ontological unity.

All passages →
Related passages · 6 parallels
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 2 (part 2)
That Will, by conceiving of its own self, thereby creates a mirror within its own self. The same takes place in the microcosm of man. By conceiving of his own self man creates a mirror in which he " feels " his own self, and thereby he be…”
Both passages explore the concept of self-awareness and the nature of the soul or divine intelligence. They discuss the idea of self-reflection and the process by which the soul or divine intelligence becomes conscious of itself, though they use different metaphors and frameworks.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 9 (part 7)
Even in its best aspect the performance is disgusting before the sanctity of that which is divine, it having been caused by sin in consequence of primordial man's degradation, but being patiently submitted to by that which is divine in man,…”
Both passages discuss the nature and origin of the soul, emphasizing its role in giving life and order to the material world. They both argue for a transcendent principle that animates and unifies the physical realm, though they use different metaphors and conceptual frameworks.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 11 (part 7)
48.) "The soul and the Word are not one or one being. The soul is born from the centre of nature, from the essences, and belongs to the body, for she issues from the essences of the body, and attracts to herself the body; but the Word is f…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the soul and its relationship with higher realms of existence. Passage A describes the soul as the Reason-Principle of the universe, interacting with both the Intellectual and sense realms, while Passage B describes the soul as being penetrated and illumined by the Word, which is from the centre of the majesty. Both passages emphasize the soul's connection to a higher, divine reality.
platonism|Plato: Phaedo|Section 1q
Then reflect, Cebes: is not the conclusion of the whole matter this?-that the soul is in the very likeness of the divine, and immortal, and intelligible, and uniform, and indissoluble, and unchangeable; and the body is in the very likeness…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the soul and its relationship to the body, emphasizing the soul's immortality and purity in contrast to the body's mortality and corruption. They share a philosophical exploration of the soul's transcendence over the physical realm.
platonism|Plato: Phaedo|Section 1{
For example, when the body is hot and thirsty, does not the soul incline us against drinking? and when the body is hungry, against eating? And this is only one instance out of ten thousand of the opposition of the soul to the things of th…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the soul and its relationship to the body. Plotinus argues for the soul as a directing principle external and transcendent to the corporeal, while Socrates refutes the idea of the soul as a harmony subject to bodily affections, asserting its leadership over the body. Both emphasize the soul's independence and superiority over the physical.
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter XVI (part 12)
He clearly affirms: I confess that I am very much inclined to assert the existence of immaterial natures in the world, and to put my soul itself into that class of beings. These immaterial beings . . . are immediately united with each o…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the soul and its relationship to the material world, emphasizing the soul's immaterial and transcendent qualities. They both argue for the existence of a non-material principle that gives life and order to the material universe.