← Home
Select Works of Plotinus · 305 of 752 · tr. Thomas Taylor

Select Works, Section 293

Section 6 6. But how comes it that while the All-Soul has produced a kosmos, the soul of the particular has not, though it is of the one ideal Kind and contains, it too, all things in itself? We have indicated that a thing may enter and dwell at the same time in various places; this ought to be explained, and the enquiry would show how an identity resident simultaneously here and there may, in its separate appearances, act or react- or both- after distinct modes; but the matter deserves to be examined in a special discussion. To return, then: how and why has the All-Soul produced a kosmos, while the particular souls simply administer some one part of it? In the first place, we are not surprised when men of identical knowledge differ greatly in effective power. But the reason, we will be asked. The answer might be that there is an even greater difference among these souls, the one never having fallen away from the All-Soul, but dwelling within it and assuming body therein, while the others received their allotted spheres when the body was already in existence, when their sister soul was already in rule and, as it were, had already prepared habitations for them. Again, the reason may be that the one [the creative All-Soul] looks towards the universal Intellectual-Principle [the exemplar of all that can be], while the others are more occupied with the Intellectual within themselves, that which is already of the sphere of part; perhaps, too, these also could have created, but that they were anticipated by that originator- the work accomplished before them- an impediment inevitable whichsoever of the souls were first to operate. But it is safer to account for the creative act by nearer connection with the over-world; the souls whose tendency is exercised within the Supreme have the greater power; immune in that pure seat they create securely; for the greater power takes the least hurt from the material within which it operates; and this power remains enduringly attached to the over-world: it creates, therefore, self gathered and the created things gather round it; the other souls, on the contrary, themselves go forth; that can mean only that they have deserted towards the abyss; a main phase in them is drawn downward and pulls them with it in the desire towards the lower. The "secondary and tertiary souls," of which we hear, must be understood in the sense of closer or remoter position: it is much as in ourselves the relation to the Supreme is not identical from soul to soul; some of us are capable of becoming Uniate, others of striving and almost attaining, while a third rank is much less apt; it is a matter of the degree or powers of the soul by which our expression is determined- the first degree dominant in the one person, the second, the third [the merely animal life] in others while, still, all of us contain all the powers.
Themes
Cosmic Sympathycosmology

The Stoic and Plotinian doctrine that all parts of the cosmos are bound by hidden affinities, so that a movement in one part resonates through the whole; the metaphysical basis for astrology, magic, and divination.

The idea that 'all the powers are present' in every function suggests a unified field of influence across the cosmos.

All passages →
Emanation Hierarchycosmology

A chain of divine beings or principles flowing downward from a single transcendent source (the One or the Father), each level less perfect than the one above.

The text references the 'All-Soul' and 'partial sphere,' implying a hierarchical structure of reality typical of Neoplatonism.

All passages →
Kingdom Withinanthropology

The claim that the divine realm is present inside the individual, accessible without external mediation.

The passage locates the 'judging faculty' and the unity of perception within a single principle inside the individual.

All passages →
Microcosm Macrocosmcosmology

The human being as a small-scale image of the entire cosmos; the body, soul, and intellect mirroring the structure of the heavens and the divine — distinct from correspondence in that it makes the human the privileged mirror.

The passage explores the relationship between the 'soul of the universe' and the 'particular soul,' arguing for their ontological identity.

All passages →
Monadcosmology

The absolutely simple, undivided first principle from which all multiplicity and existence flows.

The argument emphasizes the soul as a 'one complete thing' and 'Unity' that remains undivided despite multi-presence.

All passages →
Mystical Unionsoteriology

The merging of the individual soul or self with the divine, transcending personal identity.

The text describes the individual soul's identity with the All-Soul as a state of non-separation and unified presence.

All passages →
Paradox As Teachingethics

Using apparent contradiction, reversal, or riddle to destabilise ordinary understanding and induce insight.

The description of the soul as one complete thing yet multi-present at once presents a paradoxical ontological state.

All passages →
Tripartite Soulanthropology

Division of the human being into three principles: spirit (pneuma), soul (psyche), and body/matter (hyle or soma).

The passage mentions the 'rational soul' and distinguishes it from bodily organs like eyes and ears.

All passages →
Unity Of Beingtheology

The doctrine that all existence is ultimately one substance or one divine reality; non-duality as a theological claim.

It asserts the Soul is one complete thing present everywhere, suggesting a unified divine reality underlying multiplicity.

All passages →
Divine Simplicitytheology

The doctrine that God has no parts, divisions, or composite attributes; pure undivided being.

[auto] The passage argues that the All-Soul is an identical thing with no parts or divisions, embodying the attribute of undivided being.

All passages →
Opposites Transcendedanthropology

The dissolution of binary oppositions (male/female, inner/outer, above/below) as a mark of spiritual completion.

[auto] The text explicitly dissolves the binary opposition between a soul that is a part and a soul that is an all.

All passages →
Related passages · 6 parallels
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 1, Section 1m
65 In the whole of this passage God is spoken of as at the same time Efficient, Formal and Final Cause of the soul’s activity. D. teaches that God is present in all things, but not equally in all. Cf. Intr., p. 14 66 Gen. i. 67 Three…”
Both passages discuss the relationship between a universal soul or divine principle and individual souls or human beings. They explore the hierarchy and differing capacities of these souls in relation to the divine, with Plotinus focusing on the All-Soul and particular souls, and the second passage discussing God's presence and influence on the soul's activity.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 2, Section 1o
Yet It is a Whole because It includes the true existence of all things, and is Partitive because It contains the principle of separate Individuality whereby Christ possesses a Human Soul distinct from all other human souls, and whereby, too…”
Both passages discuss the relationship between a universal soul or divine principle and individual souls or entities. They explore how the universal principle creates and maintains order, while individual souls have distinct roles and connections to the universal. The passages share a mystical perspective on the nature of existence and the soul.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 5, Section 1e
And if these Universals exist by participating in Existence, far more is this true of the things which participate in them. 6. Thus the first gift which the Absolute and Transcendent Goodness bestows is that of mere Existence, and so It d…”
Both passages discuss the relationship between a universal principle (All-Soul in Plotinus, Absolute Goodness in the second passage) and particular souls or beings. They explore how the universal principle contains all things within itself and how particular souls or beings derive their existence and qualities from this universal principle.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 9 (part 11)
Unless this distinction of the various aspects of man is kept in mind, we are always exposed to mistaking the leaves of the tree of life for the branches, and the branches for the trunk, and the trunk for the roots. 197:1 Each soul constit…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the soul and its unity. Passage A from Plotinus explores the idea of the soul as a unified, multi-present entity, while Passage B from Theosophical texts describes the soul as an individual yet interconnected part of a larger spiritual structure. Both emphasize the non-partitioned nature of the soul and its connection to a greater whole.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 11 (part 7)
48.) "The soul and the Word are not one or one being. The soul is born from the centre of nature, from the essences, and belongs to the body, for she issues from the essences of the body, and attracts to herself the body; but the Word is f…”
Both passages explore the nature of the soul and its relationship to a higher, unified principle. Passage A discusses the unity and omnipresence of the soul, while Passage B describes the soul's relationship with the Word (divine principle), emphasizing their interconnectedness and the soul's illumination by the divine.
greek_mystery|Orphic Hymns|Front Matter, p. 4 (part 4)
Hence according to his theology there are two worlds, the intelligible and the sensible. Hence too his three demiurgic principles: Jovial, Dionysiacal, and Adonical, Δΐι#, ( ) Διονυσιακὴ, Αδωναϊκὴ, from whence many orders and differences o…”
Both passages discuss the concept of a universal soul and intellect that permeates and governs the universe. They share the idea of a hierarchical structure of being, with the soul and intellect playing central roles in maintaining the order and motion of the cosmos.