Select Works of Plotinus · 192 of 752 · tr. Thomas Taylor
Select Works, Section 197
Section 10 10. But: if the evil in men is involuntary, if their own will has not made them what they are, how can we either blame wrong-doers or even reproach their victims with suffering through their own fault? If there is a Necessity, bringing about human wickedness either by force of the celestial movement or by a rigorous sequence set up by the First Cause, is not the evil a thin rooted in Nature? And if thus the Reason-Principle of the universe is the creator of evil, surely all is injustice? No: Men are no doubt involuntary sinners in the sense that they do not actually desire to sin; but this does not alter the fact that wrongdoers, of their own choice, are, themselves, the agents; it is because they themselves act that the sin is in their own; if they were not agents they could not sin. The Necessity [held to underlie human wickedness] is not an outer force [actually compelling the individual], but exists only in the sense of a universal relationship. Nor is the force of the celestial Movement such as to leave us powerless: if the universe were something outside and apart from us it would stand as its makers willed so that, once the gods had done their part, no man, however impious, could introduce anything contrary to their intention. But, as things are, efficient act does come from men: given the starting Principle, the secondary line, no doubt, is inevitably completed; but each and every principle contributes towards the sequence. Now Men are Principles, or, at least, they are moved by their characteristic nature towards all that is good, and that nature is a Principle, a freely acting cause.
Related passages · 4 parallels
◆christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 4, Section 1{
“127 There remains but one alternative: Evil is a weakness and deficiency of Good.
31.
Good things have all one cause.
If evil is opposed to the Good, then hath evil many causes.
The efficient causes of evil results, however, are not any…”
Both passages explore the nature of evil and its relationship to human will and the divine. They both argue that evil is not a substantial force but rather a deficiency or lack of good, and that human actions, though flawed, are still driven by a desire for good.
◆christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 5 (part 10)
“119 The evil spirits are especially inimical to man; but they cannot injure him if his will is directed towards the divine, and if he does not permit himself to be captured by evil desire.
No man, except he who is regenerated in the spirit…”
Both passages discuss the nature of evil and human responsibility. They explore the idea that while external forces or influences may exist, individuals have the capacity to choose their actions and are thus responsible for their own evil deeds.
◆hermeticism|Corpus Hermeticum 12: The Prayer|Section 1b
“But for the moment, [Tat,] let be the teaching as to vice and Fate, for we have spoken of these things in other [of our sermons]; but now our teaching (logos) is about the Mind: - what Mind can do, and how it is [so] different - in men bein…”
Both passages discuss the relationship between human actions, fate, and the role of the divine or universal principles. They explore the idea of human agency within a broader cosmic framework, though from different philosophical and mystical traditions.
◆taoism|Tao Te Ching|Chapter 73
“He whose boldness appears in his daring (to do wrong, in defiance of the laws) is put to death; he whose boldness appears in his not daring (to do so) lives on. Of these two cases the one appears to be advantageous, and the other to be inju…”
Both passages discuss the concept of justice and the role of higher powers (Providence or Heaven) in governing human behavior. They both suggest that the triumph of evil or wrongdoing is not just and that there is a higher order that ensures justice, albeit in different ways.