← Home
Select Works of Plotinus · 173 of 752 · tr. Thomas Taylor

Select Works, Section 179

Section 3 3. "Atoms" or "elements"- it is in either case an absurdity, an impossibility, to hand over the universe and its contents to material entities, and out of the disorderly swirl thus occasioned to call order, reasoning, and the governing soul into being; but the atomic origin is, if we may use the phrase, the most impossible. A good deal of truth has resulted from the discussion of this subject; but, even to admit such principles does not compel us to admit universal compulsion or any kind of "fate." Suppose the atoms to exist: These atoms are to move, one downwards- admitting a down and an up- another slant-wise, all at haphazard, in a confused conflict. Nothing here is orderly; order has not come into being, though the outcome, this Universe, when it achieves existence, is all order; and thus prediction and divination are utterly impossible, whether by the laws of the science- what science can operate where there is no order?- or by divine possession and inspiration, which no less require that the future be something regulated. Material entities exposed to all this onslaught may very well be under compulsion to yield to whatsoever the atoms may bring: but would anyone pretend that the acts and states of a soul or mind could be explained by any atomic movements? How can we imagine that the onslaught of an atom, striking downwards or dashing in from any direction, could force the soul to definite and necessary reasonings or impulses or into any reasonings, impulses or thoughts at all, necessary or otherwise? And what of the soul's resistance to bodily states? What movement of atoms could compel one man to be a geometrician, set another studying arithmetic or astronomy, lead a third to the philosophic life? In a word, if we must go, like soulless bodies, wherever bodies push and drive us, there is an end to our personal act and to our very existence as living beings. The School that erects other material forces into universal causes is met by the same reasoning: we say that while these can warm us and chill us, and destroy weaker forms of existence, they can be causes of nothing that is done in the sphere of mind or soul: all this must be traceable to quite another kind of Principle.
Themes
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

The text notes that the Firsts cannot be referred to outside Causes, using negation to describe their transcendence.

All passages →
Divine Simplicitytheology

The doctrine that God has no parts, divisions, or composite attributes; pure undivided being.

The passage states that for Eternal Existents, Essence consists precisely in giving forth Act, implying a non-composite unity of being and action.

All passages →
Emanation Hierarchycosmology

A chain of divine beings or principles flowing downward from a single transcendent source (the One or the Father), each level less perfect than the one above.

The text describes a structure where 'Firsts' exist without external causes while other entities derive their Being from them, indicating a hierarchical flow.

All passages →
Monadcosmology

The absolutely simple, undivided first principle from which all multiplicity and existence flows.

The 'Firsts' are described as uncaused principles from which dependent entities derive their existence, aligning with the concept of a first principle.

All passages →
Divine Providencetheology

Pronoia — the doctrine that the divine actively orders the unfolding of the cosmos and human affairs toward intelligible ends, against pure chance or blind necessity.

[auto] The passage centrally argues against causelessness and chance, asserting that all action requires a motive or initiating power, reflecting an ordered cosmos.

All passages →
Related passages · 5 parallels
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 4, Section 1q
In this passage “Non-Existent” is used in three senses: (1) “Matter,” or force, cannot exist without some form (which is its complement) and therefore is technically called non-existent. (2) Evil cannot exist at all on the ultimate plane o…”
Both passages discuss the nature of reality and the limitations of materialistic explanations. They both argue against the idea that material entities can fully explain the nature of the soul or mind, and they explore the concept of a higher, non-material principle governing the universe.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 4, Section 1
Intr., p. 5. 259 Here we get once more the Aristotelian classification of causes. The Good is:— (i) Formal Cause (1) immanent in the world (Order— τάξις ); (2) containing the world (Embracing Power— περιοχή ). (ii) Efficient Cause (Caus…”
Both passages discuss the nature of reality and the role of order and principles beyond mere material entities. Passage A argues against atomic materialism and the idea that material entities can explain the order and reasoning of the soul, while Passage B discusses the Good as a principle that permeates and orders the universe, emphasizing the spiritual and supernatural elements that govern reality.
hermeticism|Corpus Hermeticum 14: The Discourse of Hermes to Ammon|Section 1b
Now if the Maker is naught else but That which makes, Alone, Simple, Uncompound, it needs must do this [making] to Itself,—to Which its Maker’s making is “its being made.” 2 And as to all that’s being made,—it cannot be p. 261 [paragraph c…”
Both passages discuss the relationship between the Creator and the created, emphasizing the necessity of the Creator in the existence and making of all things. They explore the nature of causality and the interconnectedness of being, though from different mystical traditions.
platonism|Plato: Timaeus|Section 1w
in space ], grasping existence in some way or other, or it could not be at all. But true and exact reason, vindicating the nature of true being, maintains that while two things [i.e. the image and space] are different they cannot exist on…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the universe and the role of elements or principles in its formation. They both argue against a purely materialistic explanation of reality and emphasize the role of higher principles or divine intervention in bringing order to the cosmos.
taoism|The Writings of Chuang Tzu (Inner Chapters)|Book 128 (part 1)
p. 236 BOOK VI. PART I. SECTION VI. Tâ Zung Shih, or 'The Great and Most Honoured Master 1 .' 1. He who knows the part which the Heavenly 2 (in him) plays, and knows(also)that which the Human 2 (in him ought to) play, has reached the p…”
Both passages explore the concept of cause and its relationship to existence and action. Plotinus discusses the necessity of cause in both the realm of process and authentic being, while the Taoist text examines the interplay between the Heavenly and the Human, emphasizing the importance of understanding and aligning with natural causes.
Select Works, Section 179 — Select Works of Plotinus — Guru