← Home
Select Works of Plotinus · 76 of 752 · tr. Thomas Taylor

Select Works, Section 83

Section 8 8. But there will still be some to deny that it is through this Matter that we ourselves become evil. They will say that neither ignorance nor wicked desires arise in Matter. Even if they admit that the unhappy condition within us is due to the pravity inherent in body, they will urge that still the blame lies not in the Matter itself but with the Form present in it- such Form as heat, cold, bitterness, saltness and all other conditions perceptible to sense, or again such states as being full or void- not in the concrete signification but in the presence or absence of just such forms. In a word, they will argue, all particularity in desires and even in perverted judgements upon things, can be referred to such causes, so that Evil lies in this Form much more than in the mere Matter. Yet, even with all this, they can be compelled to admit that Matter is the Evil. For, the quality [form] that has entered into Matter does not act as an entity apart from the Matter, any more than axe-shape will cut apart from iron. Further, Forms lodged in Matter are not the same as they would be if they remained within themselves; they are Reason-Principles Materialized, they are corrupted in the Matter, they have absorbed its nature: essential fire does not burn, nor do any of the essential entities effect, of themselves alone, the operation which, once they have entered into Matter, is traced to their action. Matter becomes mistress of what is manifested through it: it corrupts and destroys the incomer, it substitutes its own opposite character and kind, not in the sense of opposing, for example, concrete cold to concrete warmth, but by setting its own formlessness against the Form of heat, shapelessness to shape, excess and defect to the duly ordered. Thus, in sum, what enters into Matter ceases to belong to itself, comes to belong to Matter, just as, in the nourishment of living beings, what is taken in does not remain as it came, but is turned into, say, dog's blood and all that goes to make a dog, becomes, in fact, any of the humours of any recipient. No, if body is the cause of Evil, then there is no escape; the cause of Evil is Matter. Still, it will be urged, the incoming Idea should have been able to conquer the Matter. The difficulty is that Matter's master cannot remain pure itself except by avoidance of Matter. Besides, the constitution determines both the desires and their violence so that there are bodies in which the incoming idea cannot hold sway: there is a vicious constitution which chills and clogs the activity and inhibits choice; a contrary bodily habit produces frivolity, lack of balance. The same fact is indicated by our successive variations of mood: in times of stress, we are not the same either in desires or in ideas- as when we are at peace, and we differ again with every several object that brings us satisfaction. To resume: the Measureless is evil primarily; whatever, either by resemblance or participation, exists in the state of unmeasure, is evil secondarily, by force of its dealing with the Primal- primarily, the darkness; secondarily, the darkened. Now, Vice, being an ignorance and a lack of measure in the Soul, is secondarily evil, not the Essential Evil, just as Virtue is not the Primal Good but is Likeness to The Good, or participation in it.
Themes
Body As Obstacleanthropology

The material body viewed as a prison, tomb, or source of error that hinders spiritual knowledge and return.

[auto] Salvation is defined as disengaging the self from the body and escaping Matter, viewing the material realm as a hindrance.

All passages →
Cosmic Dualismtheology

Ontological opposition between two primal principles (light/darkness, truth/lie, spirit/matter) as the fundamental structure of reality.

[auto] The passage explicitly argues that the All is made up of contraries and necessitates both a Principle of Good and a Principle of Evil/Matter.

All passages →
Divine Sparkscosmology

Fragments of divine light or spirit trapped inside material bodies, awaiting liberation and return to their source.

[auto] The concept of disengaging the self from the body implies a divine element trapped within material existence awaiting liberation.

All passages →
Emanation Hierarchycosmology

A chain of divine beings or principles flowing downward from a single transcendent source (the One or the Father), each level less perfect than the one above.

[auto] The text describes a structure where the Kosmos is blended from the Intellectual-Principle and Necessity, flowing from God.

All passages →
Logoscosmology

The divine reason, word, or ordering principle through which the universe was created; mediates between the transcendent God and the material world.

[auto] The Ideal-Form is described as bringing order to Matter, functioning as the rational ordering principle of the cosmos.

All passages →
Monadcosmology

The absolutely simple, undivided first principle from which all multiplicity and existence flows.

[auto] The Principle of Good and God are referenced as the singular source from which goodness flows.

All passages →
Mystical Unionsoteriology

The merging of the individual soul or self with the divine, transcending personal identity.

[auto] The phrase 'to live among the gods' suggests a state of union or intimate proximity with the divine realm.

All passages →
Return To Sourcesoteriology

The soul's journey back to its divine origin, reversing the fall into matter through stages of purification or illumination.

[auto] The goal is to escape dissolution and live among the gods, reversing the entrapment in Matter.

All passages →
Spiritual Ascentpraxis

A staged journey of the soul upward through heavenly realms or levels of being toward the divine source.

[auto] The passage outlines a path of acquiring virtue and disengaging from the body to reach a higher divine state.

All passages →
Related passages · 7 parallels
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 4, Section 1r
Now we will bid the questioner look towards the truth of things, and in the first place we will venture thus to answer: “Evil cometh not of the Good; and if it cometh therefrom it is not evil. For even as fire cannot cool us, so Good canno…”
Both passages explore the nature of evil and its relationship to matter and the good. They share a conceptual parallel in discussing how evil is not a primary entity but rather a corruption or lack of the good, though they approach the topic from different philosophical and mystical perspectives.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 4, Section 1x
Hence if they are always in the same condition, they are not evil; for to remain always the same is a property of the Good. But if they are not always evil, then they are not evil by their natural constitution, but only through a lack of a…”
Both passages explore the nature of evil as a lack or deficiency rather than a substantive entity. They argue that evil is a deviation from the natural good, whether through a lack of virtues (Pseudo-Dionysius) or through the corruption of form by matter (Plotinus).
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 4, Section 1z
And if they say that matter is necessary for the whole world to fulfil its development, how can that be evil which depends for its existence upon the Good? For evil abhors the very nature of the Good. And how can matter, if it is evil, pr…”
Both passages discuss the nature of evil and its relationship to matter, exploring how matter can corrupt or influence the soul or forms. They share a conceptual parallel in examining the role of matter in the manifestation of evil, though they come from different mystical traditions.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 4, Section 1{
127 There remains but one alternative: Evil is a weakness and deficiency of Good. 31. Good things have all one cause. If evil is opposed to the Good, then hath evil many causes. The efficient causes of evil results, however, are not any…”
Both passages explore the nature of evil and its relationship to matter or the good. Plotinus argues that Matter is the source of evil, while the second passage posits that evil is a weakness and deficiency of the Good, showing a conceptual parallel in their exploration of evil's origin and nature.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 4, Section 1†
also “I have said, Ye are Gods.” 344 i. e. If totally and essentially by very nature evil with respect to themselves. In so far as they continue to exist they are good with respect to themselves. 345 Evil is the contrary of the Good. H…”
Both passages explore the nature of evil and its relationship to the Good. They both argue that evil is not a substantive entity but rather a privation or corruption of the Good, and that evil is not essential but rather accidental or incidental.
hermeticism|Corpus Hermeticum 10: The Sermon on the Mount|Section 1c
For that the soul who hath no knowledge of the things that are, or knowledge of their nature, or of Good, is blinded by the body's passions and tossed about. This wretched soul, not knowing what she is, becomes the slave of bodies of stran…”
Both passages discuss the concept of evil or vice in relation to the soul and its interaction with the material world. They both attribute the soul's vice to ignorance and the influence of the body, though they use different terminology and frameworks.
platonism|Plato: Timaeus|Section 1Ž
For a man who is in great joy or in great pain, in his unseasonable eagerness to attain the one and to avoid the other, is not able to see or to hear anything rightly; but he is mad, and is at the time utterly incapable of any participation…”
Both passages explore the relationship between the body and the soul, particularly how the body can influence the soul's state, leading to evil or vice. They both argue that the body's constitution and physical conditions can corrupt or disrupt the soul's proper functioning.
Select Works, Section 83 — Select Works of Plotinus — Guru