← Home
Select Works of Plotinus · 75 of 752 · tr. Thomas Taylor

Select Works, Section 82

Section 7 7. But why does the existence of the Principle of Good necessarily comport the existence of a Principle of Evil? Is it because the All necessarily comports the existence of Matter? Yes: for necessarily this All is made up of contraries: it could not exist if Matter did not. The Nature of this Kosmos is, therefore, a blend; it is blended from the Intellectual-Principle and Necessity: what comes into it from God is good; evil is from the Ancient Kind which, we read, is the underlying Matter not yet brought to order by the Ideal-Form. But, since the expression "this place" must be taken to mean the All, how explain the words "mortal nature"? The answer is in the passage [in which the Father of Gods addresses the Divinities of the lower sphere], "Since you possess only a derivative being, you are not immortals... but by my power you shall escape dissolution." The escape, we read, is not a matter of place, but of acquiring virtue, of disengaging the self from the body; this is the escape from Matter. Plato explains somewhere how a man frees himself and how he remains bound; and the phrase "to live among the gods" means to live among the Intelligible-Existents, for these are the Immortals. There is another consideration establishing the necessary existence of Evil. Given that The Good is not the only existent thing, it is inevitable that, by the outgoing from it or, if the phrase be preferred, the continuous down-going or away-going from it, there should be produced a Last, something after which nothing more can be produced: this will be Evil. As necessarily as there is Something after the First, so necessarily there is a Last: this Last is Matter, the thing which has no residue of good in it: here is the necessity of Evil.
Related passages · 9 parallels
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 2, Section 1i
The Godhead is not a Whole because it is indivisible, nor a Part because there is nothing, on the ultimate plane, outside It. Yet It is a Whole because It includes the true existence of all things, and is Partitive because It contains the…”
Both passages explore the nature of the divine and its relationship to the created world, discussing themes of perfection, imperfection, and the transcendence of the divine beyond these categories. They also touch on the existence of evil or imperfection in relation to the divine good.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 2, Section 1o
Yet It is a Whole because It includes the true existence of all things, and is Partitive because It contains the principle of separate Individuality whereby Christ possesses a Human Soul distinct from all other human souls, and whereby, too…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine and the existence of evil or imperfection in relation to the divine. Passage A from Plotinus explores the necessity of evil as a counterpart to the Principle of Good, while Passage B from the Christian mystical tradition discusses the transcendence of the Godhead and the distinction between perfection and imperfection. Both texts grapple with the relationship between the divine and the imperfect or evil aspects of existence.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 4, Section 1a
CHAPTER IV Concerning ” Good ,” ” Light ,” ” Beautiful ,” “ Desire ,” ” Ecstasy ,” “ Jealousy .” Also that Evil is neither existent nor Sprung from anything existent nor inherent in existent things . 1. Now let us consider the name of “Go…”
Both passages discuss the nature of Good and Evil, with Passage A describing the necessary existence of Evil as a counterpart to the Principle of Good, and Passage B describing the transcendent nature of Good and its relationship to creation. Both explore the metaphysical implications of these concepts within their respective traditions.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 4, Section 1c
The Good is beyond this distinction, for nothing (on the ultimate plane) is outside It. See Intr., p. 5. and Lifelessness an excess of Life and Its Mindless state is an excess of Wisdom, 252 252 This apparently profitless speculation rea…”
Both passages discuss the nature of Good and Evil, and the necessity of Evil in relation to the existence of the Good. They explore the concept of Evil as a lack or negation of the Good, and the idea that the Good transcends existence.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 4, Section 1q
In this passage “Non-Existent” is used in three senses: (1) “Matter,” or force, cannot exist without some form (which is its complement) and therefore is technically called non-existent. (2) Evil cannot exist at all on the ultimate plane o…”
Both passages explore the nature of Good and Evil, positing that Evil is a result of the absence or corruption of the Good. They also discuss the necessary existence of Evil in relation to the Good within a cosmic framework.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 4, Section 1u
For things of the same kind cannot 333 333 Exuberant vitality is per se a good thing and the more exuberant the better, though, like all good things, it is dangerous, and unless properly directed is disastrous. be wholly contradictory to o…”
Both passages discuss the nature of evil and its relationship to the Good. They argue that evil is not an ultimate principle and explore the metaphysical implications of the existence of good and evil. The passages share a conceptual parallel in their exploration of the non-existence of evil as an ultimate principle and its relationship to the Good.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 4, Section 1„
Good cannot have produced it because a thing cannot produce its own opposite; evil cannot have produced itself because evil is always destructive and never productive. All things that exist are produced by the Good or the desire for the Go…”
Both passages discuss the nature of Good and Evil, their origins, and their relationship to existence. They both posit that Evil is not a substantive force but rather a lack or corruption of the Good, and that the universe is a blend of these principles.
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 4, Section 1…
In the one case we get Immanence without Transcendence: in the other Transcendence without Immanence. D. holds a Transcendent Immanence (cf. Bradley, Appearance and Reality, rebutting charge of Pantheism). 328 e. g. The cruelty of Nat…”
Both passages explore the nature of good and evil, their origins, and their relationship to existence. They discuss the necessity of evil in the context of a broader cosmic framework, though from different philosophical and theological perspectives.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 4 (part 3)
7.) "We cannot reasonably suppose any formation or differentiation to have existed in the eternal One from which, or according to which (formation) something could have been made; for if such a form, or predisposition to making a form, had…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine and the existence of evil or material aspects in creation. They explore the relationship between the divine principle and the material world, though from different theological perspectives.