← Home
Select Works of Plotinus · 51 of 752 · tr. Thomas Taylor

Select Works, Section 57

Section 7 7. But if we are to consider only the present and may not call in the past to make the total, why do we not reckon so in the case of time itself, where, in fact, we do not hesitate to add the past to the present and call the total greater? Why not suppose a quantity of happiness equivalent to a quantity of time? This would be no more than taking it lap by lap to correspond with time-laps instead of choosing to consider it as an indivisible, measurable only by the content of a given instant. There is no absurdity in taking count of time which has ceased to be: we are merely counting what is past and finished, as we might count the dead: but to treat past happiness as actually existent and as outweighing present happiness, that is an absurdity. For Happiness must be an achieved and existent state, whereas any time over and apart from the present is nonexistent: all progress of time means the extinction of all the time that has been. Hence time is aptly described as a mimic of eternity that seeks to break up in its fragmentary flight the permanence of its exemplar. Thus whatever time seizes and seals to itself of what stands permanent in eternity is annihilated- saved only in so far as in some degree it still belongs to eternity, but wholly destroyed if it be unreservedly absorbed into time. If Happiness demands the possession of the good of life, it clearly has to do with the life of Authentic-Existence for that life is the Best. Now the life of Authentic-Existence is measurable not by time but by eternity; and eternity is not a more or a less or a thing of any magnitude but is the unchangeable, the indivisible, is timeless Being. We must not muddle together Being and Non-Being, time and eternity, not even everlasting time with the eternal; we cannot make laps and stages of an absolute unity; all must be taken together, wheresoever and howsoever we handle it; and it must be taken at that, not even as an undivided block of time but as the Life of Eternity, a stretch not made up of periods but completely rounded, outside of all notion of time.
Themes
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

Eternity is described by negation as 'not a more or a less,' 'timeless Being,' and outside all notion of time.

All passages →
Emanation Hierarchycosmology

A chain of divine beings or principles flowing downward from a single transcendent source (the One or the Father), each level less perfect than the one above.

The distinction between the 'Life of Authentic-Existence' and temporal existence implies an ontological hierarchy of being.

All passages →
Evil As Privationtheology

Augustinian and Plotinian doctrine that evil has no positive being of its own but is a lack, distortion, or absence of the good — denying ontological dualism while preserving moral seriousness.

Time is described as a 'mimic' that annihilates permanence, suggesting lower reality is a deficiency or lack of true eternal being.

All passages →
Monadcosmology

The absolutely simple, undivided first principle from which all multiplicity and existence flows.

The reference to 'absolute unity' that cannot be made into laps or stages aligns with the concept of the undivided first principle.

All passages →
Unity Of Beingtheology

The doctrine that all existence is ultimately one substance or one divine reality; non-duality as a theological claim.

The text emphasizes that the eternal life must be taken together as a 'completely rounded' whole and an 'absolute unity' rather than fragmented stages.

All passages →
Divine Simplicitytheology

The doctrine that God has no parts, divisions, or composite attributes; pure undivided being.

[auto] The passage centrally defines eternity and authentic existence as 'indivisible,' 'unchangeable,' and an 'absolute unity' without parts or magnitude.

All passages →
Related passages · 8 parallels
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 10, Section 1c
It is spoken of by ail the Christian Mystics as the root of our being, or as the spark, or the Synteresis, etc. Our perfection consists in this ultimate reality, which is each man’s self, shining through his whole being and transforming it…”
Both passages explore the relationship between time and eternity, contrasting the transient nature of time with the permanence of eternity. They also discuss the concept of happiness or spiritual joy in relation to these temporal and eternal dimensions.
platonism|Plato: Timaeus|Section 1m
They are all parts of time, and the past and future are created species of time, which we unconsciously but wrongly transfer to the eternal essence; for we say that he "was," he "is," he "will be," but the truth is that "is" alone is proper…”
Both passages discuss the nature of time and its relationship to eternity, emphasizing that eternity is unchangeable and indivisible, while time is a mimic or imitation of eternity. They both explore the idea that time is a created entity that seeks to emulate the permanence of eternity.
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter IV (part 2)
The future also does not exist—it does not exist as yet. It has not arrived, has not formed. By the present we mean the moment of transition of the future into the past, i.e., the moment of transition of a phenomenon from one non-existenc…”
Both passages explore the nature of time and existence, questioning the reality of the past, present, and future. They share a mystical perspective that challenges conventional views of time, though they come from different traditions.
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter IV (part 4)
43 little bit of that present, and this alone we count as existent, denying a real existence to everything else. If we admit this, then our view of everything with which we are surrounded will change very considerably. Usually we regard t…”
Both passages explore the nature of time and its relationship to existence and causality. They discuss the interplay between past, present, and future, and the deterministic versus free will perspectives on the future. However, they approach these themes from different philosophical and mystical traditions.
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter IV (part 5)
There results in the other case a life upon some sort of needle-point called the present , which is surrounded on all sides by an abyss of non-existence, a journey in a country which does not as yet exist , a life in a world which is born a…”
Both passages explore the nature of time and its relationship to the present, past, and future. They share a mystical perspective that challenges conventional linear understandings of time, suggesting a more complex, multidimensional reality.
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter IV (part 6)
It is necessary to admit that by one term, time , we designate really two ideas—"a certain space" and "motion upon that space." This motion does not exist in reality, and it seems to us as existing only because we do not see the spatiality…”
Both passages explore the nature of time and its relationship with eternity, challenging conventional perceptions of motion and the passage of time. They both delve into the idea that time is not merely a sequence of events but has a spatial dimension, and they discuss the concept of eternity as something that transcends time.
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter X (part 5)
To the two-dimensional being time is necessary for the understanding of the most simple phenomena—an angle, a hill, a ditch. For us time is not necessary for the understanding of such phenomena, but is necessary for the explanation of the…”
Both passages explore the nature of time and its relationship to higher dimensions or eternal states. Passage A discusses the receding idea of time with the expansion of consciousness, while Passage B considers the nature of time and its distinction from eternity, particularly in the context of happiness and authentic existence.
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter XXI (part 9)
There cannot be anything which is measured by years, days, hours—there cannot be before, now, after. Moments of different epochs, divided by great intervals of time, exist simultaneously, and may touch one another. Along with this, all th…”
Both passages explore the nature of reality beyond the constraints of time and space, emphasizing the unity and interconnectedness of all things. They challenge conventional perceptions of time, space, and existence, suggesting a deeper, more unified reality.