← Home
Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names · 4 of 5 · tr. C.E. Rolt

Chapter 9, Section 1d

Scripture itself declares 451 451 Cf. e. g. Ps. lxxxvi. 8 . that God is Dissimilar to the world, and not to be compared therewith. It says that He is different from all things, and (what is yet more strange) that there is nothing even similar to Him. And yet such language contradicts not the Similitude of things to Him. For the same things are both like unto God and unlike Him: like Him in so far as they can imitate Him that is beyond imitation, unlike Him in so far as the effects fall short of the Cause and are infinitely and incomparably inferior. 8. Now what say we concerning the Divine attributes of “Standing” and “Sitting”? Merely this—that God remains What He is in Himself and is firmly fixed in an immovable Sameness wherein His transcendent Being is fast rooted, and that He acts under the same modes and around the same Centre without changing; and that He is wholly Self-Subsistent in His Stability, possessing Very Immutability and an entire Immobility, and that He is all this in a Super-Essential manner. 452 452 i. e. This stability is due to Undifferentiation. For He is the Cause of the stability and rest of all things: He who is beyond all Rest and Standing. And in Him all things have their consistency and are preserved, so as not to be shaken from the stability of their proper virtues. 9. And what is meant, on the other hand, when the Sacred Writers say that the Immovable God moves and goes forth unto all things? Must we not understand this also in a manner befitting God? Reverence bids us regard His motion to imply no change of place, variation, alteration, turning or 168 locomotion, whether straightforward, circular, or compounded of both; or whether belonging to mind, soul, or natural powers; but to mean that God brings all things into being and sustains them, 453 453 St. Augustine frequently explains God’s activity to consist in His causing His creatures to act, while Himself resting. and exerts all manner of Providence over them, and is present to them all, holding them in His incomprehensible embrace, and exercising over them all His providential Emanations and Activities. Nevertheless our reason must agree to attribute movements to the Immutable God in such a sense as befits Him. Straightness we must understand to mean Directness of aim and the unswerving Emanation of His energies, and the outbirth of all things from Him. His Spiral Movement must be taken to mean the combination of a persistent Emanation and a productive Stillness. And His Circular Movement must be taken to mean His Sameness, wherein He holds together the intermediate orders and those at either extremity, so as to embrace each other, and the act whereby the things that have gone forth from Him return to Him again. 10. And if any one takes the Scriptural Title of “Same,” or that of “Righteousness,” as implying Equality, we must call God “Equal,” not only because He is without parts and doth not swerve from His purpose, but also because He penetrates equally to all things and through all, and is the Fount of Very Equality, whereby He worketh equally the uniform interpenetration of all things and the participation thereof possessed by things which (each according to its capacity) have an equal share therein, and the equal 454 454 i. e. “Due,” “right,” cf. p. 161, n. 3.
Themes
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

The text emphasizes God's transcendence of comparison and the impossibility of finding anything similar to Him.

All passages →
Divine Hiddennesstheology

The supreme God's radical concealment beyond ordinary knowledge or perception; the Hidden Father.

God is described as beyond comparison and not to be found in the world, indicating radical concealment.

All passages →
Divine Simplicitytheology

The doctrine that God has no parts, divisions, or composite attributes; pure undivided being.

The passage explicitly states God has no parts and is without swerving from His purpose.

All passages →
Emanation Hierarchycosmology

A chain of divine beings or principles flowing downward from a single transcendent source (the One or the Father), each level less perfect than the one above.

The text references 'Emanations' and describes God's action over all things through a structured flow of energies.

All passages →
Evil As Privationtheology

Augustinian and Plotinian doctrine that evil has no positive being of its own but is a lack, distortion, or absence of the good — denying ontological dualism while preserving moral seriousness.

Effects are described as falling short of the Cause and being infinitely inferior to the divine source.

All passages →
Living Godtheology

The divine conceived as active, present, and dynamic—not an abstract principle but a personal responsive reality.

The text describes God's active presence, providence, and motion over all things despite His immobility.

All passages →
Monadcosmology

The absolutely simple, undivided first principle from which all multiplicity and existence flows.

God is portrayed as the singular, undivided first principle from which all existence flows and remains what He is in Himself.

All passages →
Paradox As Teachingethics

Using apparent contradiction, reversal, or riddle to destabilise ordinary understanding and induce insight.

The passage notes that Scripture declares God is different from all things yet things are both like unto Him.

All passages →
Unity Of Beingtheology

The doctrine that all existence is ultimately one substance or one divine reality; non-duality as a theological claim.

God is described as the Fount of Very Equality and the source of uniform interpenetration among all things.

All passages →
Related passages · 6 parallels
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 138
Section 16 16. Then Matter is simply Alienism [the Principle of Difference]? No: it is merely that part of Alienism which stands in contradiction with the Authentic Existents which are Reason-Principles. So understood, this non-existent has…”
Both passages explore the relationship between the divine and the material world, discussing the nature of existence, non-existence, and the attributes of the divine. They both delve into the concept of the divine being beyond human comprehension and the nature of existence and non-existence.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 258 (part 1)
Section 6 6. Now the Principle this stated, all good and beauty, and everlasting, is centred in The One, sprung from It, and pointed towards It, never straying from It, but ever holding about It and in It and living by Its law; and it is i…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine and its relationship to existence and time. Passage A from Plotinus describes the One as the source of all good and beauty, emphasizing its eternal and unchanging nature. Passage B from the mystical tradition discusses God's immutability and transcendence, highlighting the divine stability and the manner in which God interacts with creation. Both texts explore the concept of an eternal, unchanging divine principle that is the source of all existence.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 635
Section 15 15. We must repeat: The Collective Being, the Authentic, There, is at once Being and Intellectual-Principle and the Complete Living Form; thus it includes the total of living things; the Unity There is reproduced by the unity of…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine and its relationship to creation, emphasizing the transcendence and immanence of the divine. They explore how the divine is both beyond and within the created world, using concepts like stability, movement, and unity.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 677
Section 38 38. And yet this "He Is" does not truly apply: the Supreme has no need of Being: even "He is good" does not apply since it indicates Being: the "is" should not suggest something predicated of another thing; it is to state identit…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine and the limitations of human language and understanding in describing the Supreme or God. They explore the idea that the divine is beyond being and traditional attributes, emphasizing the ineffable and transcendent nature of the divine.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 690
Section 8 8. But it is not, in our view, as an attribute that this freedom is present in the First. In the light of free acts, from which we eliminate the contraries, we recognise There self-determination, self-directed and, failing more su…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine as being beyond human comprehension and comparison, emphasizing the transcendence and uniqueness of the First Principle or God. They both explore the limitations of human language and understanding in describing the divine.
platonism|Plato: Phaedo|Section 1
The reason why I say this is that I want you to agree with me in thinking, not only that absolute greatness will never be great and also small, but that greatness in us or in the concrete will never admit the small or admit of being exceede…”
Both passages explore the nature of opposites and the relationship between absolute concepts and their manifestations in the physical world. Plato discusses the impossibility of opposites coexisting in absolute forms, while the mystical tradition discusses the dissimilarity and similitude of God to the world, highlighting the transcendence and immanence of divine attributes.