← Home
Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names · 24 of 39 · tr. C.E. Rolt

Chapter 4, Section 1x

Hence if they are always in the same condition, they are not evil; for to remain always the same is a property of the Good. But if they are not always evil, then they are not evil by their natural constitution, but only through a lack of angelic virtues. 350 350 Evil is essentially a negative and self-contradictory thing. Its very permanence would be opposed to its own nature and would be due to an element of the Good within it. Hence they are not utterly without the Good, seeing that they exist and live and form intuitions and have 122 within them any movement of desire at all; but they are called evil because they fail in the exercise of their natural activity. The evil in them is therefore a warping, a declension from their right condition; a failure, an imperfection, an. impotence, and a weakness, loss and lapse of that power which would preserve their perfection in them. Moreover what is the evil in the devils? Brutish wrath, blind desire, headstrong fancy. But these qualities, even though they exist in the devils, are not wholly, invariably, and essentially evil. For in other living creatures, not the possession of these qualities but their loss is destructive of the creature and hence is evil; while their possession preserves the creature and enables the creature possessing them to exist. Hence the devils are not evil in so far as they fulfil their nature, but in so far as they do not. Nor hath the Good bestowed complete upon them been changed; rather have they fallen from the completeness of that gift. And we maintain that the angelic gifts bestowed upon their have never themselves suffered change, but are unblemished in their perfect brightness, even if the devils themselves do not perceive it through blinding their faculties of spiritual perception. 351 351 There is a timeless ground in all personalities, and this ground is good. Eckhart and Tauler say, that even the souls in hell possess eternally the divine root of their true being. Ruysbroeck says, this divine root does not of itself make us blessed, but merely makes us exist. Thus, so far as their existence is concerned, they possess it from the Good, and are naturally good, and desire the Beautiful and Good in desiring existence, life, and intuition, which are existent things. And they are called evil through the deprivation and the loss whereby they have lapsed from their proper virtues. And hence they are evil in so far as they do not exist; and in desiring evil they desire that which is non-existent. 24. But perhaps some one will say that human 123 souls are the seat of evil. Now if the reason alleged is that they have contact with evil temptations when they take forethought to preserve themselves therefrom, this is not evil but good and cometh from the Good that turns even evil into good. But if we mean the depravation which souls undergo, in what do they undergo depravation except in the deficiency of good qualities and activities and in the failure and fall therefrom due to their own weakness? Even so we say that the air is darkened around us by a deficiency and absence of the light; while yet the light itself is always light and illuminates the darkness. Hence the evil inhereth not in the devils or in us, as evil, but only as a deficiency and lack of the perfection of our proper virtues. 25. Neither inhereth evil in the brute beasts. For if you take away the passions of anger, desire, etc.
Themes
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

Evil is described as 'essentially a negative and self-contradictory thing' that opposes its own nature.

All passages →
Evil As Privationtheology

Augustinian and Plotinian doctrine that evil has no positive being of its own but is a lack, distortion, or absence of the good — denying ontological dualism while preserving moral seriousness.

The passage centrally defines evil as a 'lack of angelic virtues,' a 'failure' and 'imperfection,' rather than a positive substance.

All passages →
Kingdom Withinanthropology

The claim that the divine realm is present inside the individual, accessible without external mediation.

It asserts that even souls in hell possess the divine root of their true being from the Good.

All passages →
Monadcosmology

The absolutely simple, undivided first principle from which all multiplicity and existence flows.

References to the 'Good' and 'timeless ground' imply a singular first principle.

All passages →
Related passages · 5 parallels
neoplatonism|Iamblichus: On the Mysteries|Chapter VII
Moreover, it is necessary to add the causes whence evils [90] sometimes arise, and to show how many and of what kind they are. For the form of them is not simple; but, being various, is the leader of the generation of various evils. For if…”
Both passages discuss the nature of evil as a lack or deficiency of good qualities, rather than an inherent substance. They also explore how evil entities (devils or dæmons) are not evil by their natural constitution but through a failure to exercise their proper virtues.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 79
Section 4 4. The bodily Kind, in that it partakes of Matter is an evil thing. What form is in bodies is an untrue-form: they are without life: by their own natural disorderly movement they make away with each other; they are hindrances to t…”
Both passages discuss the nature of evil as a lack or deficiency of good, rather than as a substantive entity. They also explore how evil arises from a deviation from one's natural or divine state, and how even evil beings possess an underlying goodness.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 81 (part 1)
Section 6 6. If this be so, how do we explain the teaching that evils can never pass away but "exist of necessity," that "while evil has no place in the divine order, it haunts mortal nature and this place for ever"? Does this mean that h…”
Both passages explore the nature of evil as a lack or deficiency of the Good, and discuss the relationship between evil and the divine order. They share a conceptual parallel in viewing evil as a deviation from perfection rather than an independent entity.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 83
Section 8 8. But there will still be some to deny that it is through this Matter that we ourselves become evil. They will say that neither ignorance nor wicked desires arise in Matter. Even if they admit that the unhappy condition within us…”
Both passages explore the nature of evil as a lack or deficiency rather than a substantive entity. They argue that evil is a deviation from the natural good, whether through a lack of virtues (Pseudo-Dionysius) or through the corruption of form by matter (Plotinus).
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 121
Section 18 18. Are the evils in the Universe necessary because it is of later origin than the Higher Sphere? Perhaps rather because without evil the All would be incomplete. For most or even all forms of evil serve the Universe- much as the…”
Both passages explore the nature of evil and its relationship to the Good. They agree that evil is a lack or deficiency of the Good, and that even in evil, there is an underlying goodness that allows for existence and desire.