← Home
Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names · 2 of 15 · tr. C.E. Rolt

Chapter 1, Section 1b

For even as things which are intellectually discerned 52 52 i. e. The Transcendent Truths which are beyond ordinary knowledge. νοητά . The word νοῦς = Mind in the sense not merely of abstract intellect but of the spiritual personality. Hence the word is often used to = an angel; and νοητός is often used as = spiritual, instead of πνευματικός , which D. does not employ. This use of νοῦς and its derivatives is ultimately due to the influence of Aristotle. (Cf. the use of νοῦς in Plotinas.) St. Thomas Aquinas regards intellectus as = “personality.” But here the reference is perhaps rather to the province of abstract intellect. cannot be comprehended or perceived by means of those things which belong to the senses, nor simple and imageless things by means of types and images, nor the formless and intangible essence of unembodied things by means of those which have bodily form, 53 53 Apparently this is the same thought repeated in three different ways. The formless essence (ἀμορφία) of a thing is simple and imageless—a Platonic idea—perceived by the mind; things which have bodily form are, as it were, types and symbols perceived by the senses. by the same law of truth the boundless 54 54 Or “indeterminate.” Super-Essence surpasses Essences, the Super-Intellectual Unity surpasses Intelligences, 53 the One which is beyond thought surpasses the apprehension of thought, and the Good which is beyond utterance surpasses the reach of words. 55 55 Thus the three grades are: (1) the material world; (2) the spiritual world of truths, personality, etc.; (3) the Godhead which is, so to speak, supra-spiritual. Yea, it is an Unity which is the unifying Source of all unity and a Super-Essential Essence, 56 56 i. e. A Supra-Personal Personality. See Intr., p. 4 f. a Mind beyond the reach of mind 57 57 νοῦς ἀνοητός. Probably not ” Irrational Mind” (as Dr. Inge translates it). Maximus takes it passively, as translated above. and a Word beyond utterance, eluding Discourse, Intuition, Name, and every kind of being. It is the Universal Cause of existence while Itself existing not, for It is beyond all Being and such that It alone could give, with proper understanding thereof, a revelation of Itself. 2. Now concerning this hidden Super-Essential Godhead we must not dare, as I have said, to speak, or even to form any conception Thereof, except those things which are divinely revealed to us from the Holy Scriptures. For as It hath lovingly taught us in the Scriptures concerning Itself 58 58 Ps. cxlv. 3 ; Matt. xi 27 ; Rom. xi. 33 ; I Cor. ii. 11 ; Eph. iii. 8 . the understanding and contemplation of Its actual nature is not accessible to any being; for such knowledge is superessentially exalted above them all. And many of the Sacred Writers thou wilt find who have declared that It is not only invisible and incomprehensible, but also unsearchable and past finding out, since there is no trace of any that have penetrated the hidden depths of Its infinitude.
Themes
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

The text repeatedly emphasizes that God is beyond thought, utterance, and conception, transcending all categories of knowledge.

All passages →
Divine Hiddennesstheology

The supreme God's radical concealment beyond ordinary knowledge or perception; the Hidden Father.

The passage explicitly describes God as invisible, incomprehensible, and past finding out.

All passages →
Divine Simplicitytheology

The doctrine that God has no parts, divisions, or composite attributes; pure undivided being.

The text refers to the 'One which is beyond thought' and a 'Super-Essential Essence', implying undivided being.

All passages →
Emanation Hierarchycosmology

A chain of divine beings or principles flowing downward from a single transcendent source (the One or the Father), each level less perfect than the one above.

The passage outlines a hierarchy where the Super-Essence surpasses Essences and the One surpasses thought.

All passages →
Living Godtheology

The divine conceived as active, present, and dynamic—not an abstract principle but a personal responsive reality.

God is described as a 'Universal Cause of existence' and 'eluding Discourse'.

All passages →
Monadcosmology

The absolutely simple, undivided first principle from which all multiplicity and existence flows.

The text explicitly identifies the One which is beyond thought as the unifying Source of all unity.

All passages →
Mystical Unionsoteriology

The merging of the individual soul or self with the divine, transcending personal identity.

The text describes God as a 'Unity' that is the 'unifying Source of all unity'.

All passages →
Paradox As Teachingethics

Using apparent contradiction, reversal, or riddle to destabilise ordinary understanding and induce insight.

The passage uses paradoxical statements such as God existing not while being a Universal Cause.

All passages →
Sacred Namestheology

Divine names or formulas that carry ontological power, used in prayer, liturgy, or magical practice.

The passage discusses the limitations of names and utterance in describing God.

All passages →
Spiritual Ascentpraxis

A staged journey of the soul upward through heavenly realms or levels of being toward the divine source.

The passage describes a hierarchy of being where higher levels transcend lower ones.

All passages →
Related passages · 14 parallels
greek_mystery|Orphic Hymns|Hymn LXXVI. MNEMOSYNE, or the GODDESS of MEMORY
LXXVI. To MNEMOSYNE, or the GODDESS of MEMORY * . The FUMIGATION from FRANKINCENSE. THE consort I invoke of Jove divine, Source of the holy, sweetly-speaking Nine; p. 215 Free from th' oblivion of the fallen mind, By whom the soul with inte…”
Both passages explore the concept of a higher, transcendent reality that is beyond ordinary comprehension. They discuss the limitations of human understanding and the need for divine revelation or intellectual illumination to grasp these higher truths.
greek_mystery|The Golden Verses of Pythagoras|Section 12 (part 8)
Explanation .--This Symbol signifies that it is not proper to divulse the union and consent of the universe. And still further it signifies this, Be not envious, but philanthropic and communicative; and from this it exhorts us to philosoph…”
Both passages emphasize the importance of intellectual and spiritual discernment over sensory perception. They advocate for the understanding of higher truths that are beyond ordinary knowledge and the rejection of material or corporeal understandings.
neoplatonism|Iamblichus: On the Mysteries|Chapter II
Hear, therefore, the intellectual interpretation of symbols, according to the conceptions of the Egyptians; at the same time removing from your imagination and your ears the image of things symbolical, but elevating yourself to intellectual…”
Both passages discuss the transcendence and incomprehensibility of the divine, emphasizing the divine's existence beyond material and intellectual realms. They share a mystical approach to understanding the divine, though they come from different traditions.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 280 (part 2)
But intellection does not mean self-ownership; it means turning the gaze towards the Primal: now the act of intellection is itself the Primal Act, and there is therefore no place for any earlier one. The Being projecting this Act transcend…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine as transcending intellect and being beyond comprehension. They explore the idea of a supreme, formless essence that is the source of all existence and unity, which is beyond the reach of human understanding and language.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 387
Section 8 8. It can be shown also that the intellectual act would similarly be impossible if the soul were any form of body. If sensation is apprehension by means of the soul's employment of the body, intellection cannot be a similar use of…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the intellect and its ability to apprehend non-material, incorporeal realities. They both argue for the existence of a higher, non-physical principle that is capable of understanding abstract concepts and eternal truths.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 454 (part 1)
Section 1 1. The Intellectual-Principle, the veritably and essentially intellective, can this be conceived as ever falling into error, ever failing to think reality? Assuredly no: it would no longer be intelligent and therefore no longer…”
Both passages explore the nature of the Intellectual-Principle or Mind (νοῦς) and its relationship to reality and truth. They discuss the limitations of sense perception and the inherent knowledge of the Intellectual-Principle, as well as the transcendence of the ultimate reality beyond ordinary knowledge.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 469
Section 2 2. Thus there is the primally intellective and there is that in which intellection has taken another mode; but this indicates that what transcends the primarily intellective has no intellection; for, to have intellection, it must…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine and the limitations of human intellect in comprehending it. They explore the idea of a transcendent principle that exists beyond intellectual acts and is self-sufficient, drawing parallels in their mystical descriptions of the ultimate reality.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 471
Section 4 4. Another consideration is that if The Good [and First] is simplex and without need, it can neither need the intellective act nor possess what it does not need: it will therefore not have intellection. (Interpolation or corruptio…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the divine as being beyond intellect and association, emphasizing the simplicity and transcendence of the ultimate reality. They share a conceptual parallel in their exploration of the ineffable and unifying aspects of the divine.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 473
Section 6 6. If this reasoning is valid, The Good has no scope whatever for intellection which demands something attractive from outside. The Good, then, is without Act. What Act indeed, could be vested in Activity's self? No activity has y…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the ultimate reality (The Good in Plotinus, the Super-Essential Godhead in Dionysius) as being beyond intellection, being, and language. They both emphasize the unity and transcendence of this ultimate reality.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 497 (part 1)
Section 5 5. This Intellectual-Principle, if the term is to convey the truth, must be understood to be not a principle merely potential and not one maturing from unintelligence to intelligence- that would simply send us seeking, once more,…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the Intellectual-Principle or Super-Essential Godhead, emphasizing its transcendence, unity, and the inability of human senses or language to fully comprehend it. They share a mystical approach to understanding the divine, though they come from different traditions.
4 more
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 499
Section 7 7. Knowledge in the reasoning soul is on the one side concerned with objects of sense, though indeed this can scarcely be called knowledge and is better indicated as opinion or surface-knowing; it is of later origin than the objec…”
Both passages discuss the nature of intellectual knowledge and the higher principles beyond sensory perception. They explore the idea of a transcendent reality that is beyond ordinary understanding and the limitations of human cognition in comprehending it.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 678
Section 39 39. Since the Supreme has no interval, no self-differentiation what can have this intuitional approach to it but itself? Therefore it quite naturally assumes difference at the point where Intellectual-Principle and Being are diff…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the Supreme or Transcendent Truth, emphasizing its simplicity, unity, and the inability of human intellect to fully comprehend it. They both explore the limitations of intellection and the transcendent nature of the divine.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 679 (part 1)
Section 40 40. That there can be no intellection in the First will be patent to those that have had such contact; but some further confirmation is desirable, if indeed words can carry the matter; we need overwhelming persuasion. It must b…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the ultimate reality (the Good in Plotinus, the Super-Essential Godhead in Dionysius) and its relationship to intellect or intellection. They both argue that the ultimate reality transcends intellect and cannot be comprehended through it.
renaissance_hermeticism|The Heroic Enthusiasts, Part I (Gli Eroici Furori)|Fifth Dialogueg
This special human intelligence which influences all individuals is like the moon, which partakes of no other species but that one alone which always renews itself by the transmutation caused in it by the sun, which is the primal and univer…”
Both passages discuss the nature of divine intelligence and its relationship with human understanding. They explore the idea of a universal, transcendent intelligence that is beyond ordinary comprehension, with Passage A using the metaphor of the sun and Passage B discussing the Super-Essential Godhead.