← Home
Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky) · 73 of 225 · tr. Nicholas Bessaraboff and Claude Bragdon

Chapter IX (part 8)

Thus in all its relations to the world the animal is quite analogous to the imagined, unreal two-dimensional being living upon a plane. All our world appears to the animal as the plane through which phenomena are passing, moving upon time, or in time. And so we may say that we have established the following: that under certain limitations of the psychic apparatus for receiving the outer world, for the subject possessing this apparatus, the entire aspect and all properties of the world will suffer change. And two subjects, living side by side, but possessing different psychic apparatus, will inhabit different worlds—the properties of the extension of the world will be different for them. And we observed the conditions, not invented for the purpose, not concocted in imagination, but really existing in nature; that is, the psychic conditions governing the lives of animals, under which the world appears as a plane or as a line. That is to say, we have established that the three-dimensional extension of the world depends upon the properties of our psychic apparatus. Or, that the three-dimensionality of the world is not its property, but a property of our receptivity of the world. In other words, the three-dimensionality of the world is a property of its reflection in our consciousness. If all this is so, then it is obvious that we have really proved the dependence of space upon the space-sense . And if we have proved the existence of a space-sense lower in comparison with ours , by this we have proved the possibility of a space-sense higher in comparison with ours . And we shall grant that if in us there develops the fourth unit of reasoning as different from the concept as the concept is different from perception, so simultaneously with it will appear for us in the surrounding world a fourth characteristic which we may designate geometrically as the fourth direction or the fourth perpendicular, because in this characteristic will be included the properties of objects perpendicular to all properties known to us, and not parallel to any of them. In other words, we shall see, or we shall feel ourselves in a space not of three, but of four dimensions; and in the objects surrounding us, and in our own bodies, will appear common p. 111 properties of the fourth dimension which we did not notice before, or which we regarded as individual properties of objects (or their motion), just as animals regard the extension of objects in the third dimension as their motion. And when we shall see or feel ourselves in the world of four dimensions we shall see that the world of three dimensions does not really exist and has never existed: that it was the creation of our own fantasy, a phantom host, an optical illusion, a delusion—anything one pleases excepting only reality. And all this is not an "hypothesis," not a supposition, but exact fact, just such a fact as the existence of infinity. For positivism to insure its existence it was necessary to annihilate infinity somehow, or at least to call it an "hypothesis" which may or may not be true. Infinity however is not an hypothesis, but a fact, and such a fact is the multi-dimensionality of space and all that it implies, namely, the unreality of everything three-dimensional. Footnotes 99:1 In this connection, there have been some interesting observations made upon the blind who are just beginning to see. In the magazine Slepetz (The Blind, 1912) there is a description from direct observation of how those born blind learn to see after the operation which restored their sight. This is how a seventeen-year-old youth, who recovered his sight after the removal of a cataract, describes his impressions. On the third day after the operation he was asked what he saw. He answered that he saw an enormous field of light and misty objects moving upon it. These objects he did not discern.
Themes
Correspondencecosmology

The Hermetic axiom that the structure of the cosmos is reflected at every scale — 'as above, so below; as within, so without' — making each level a legible map of the others.

The text links the internal structure of the psychic apparatus directly to the external properties of the perceived world.

All passages →
Gnosis Direct Knowledgesoteriology

Salvation through direct experiential knowledge of the divine nature, not through faith, ritual, or moral works alone.

The text proposes a higher unit of reasoning that reveals the true fourth-dimensional reality directly, distinguishing it from ordinary perception.

All passages →
Infinite Cosmoscosmology

The doctrine of the universe as boundless and without center or circumference, populated by innumerable worlds — Bruno's rejection of the closed Aristotelian sphere; the divine and the cosmos as ontologically infinite.

The passage explicitly asserts the existence of infinity as a fact and argues for multi-dimensionality beyond the closed three-dimensional sphere.

All passages →
Kingdom Withinanthropology

The claim that the divine realm is present inside the individual, accessible without external mediation.

It states that the properties of the world are a reflection in our consciousness, implying that reality is structured internally rather than externally.

All passages →
Mechanical Humanityanthropology

Gurdjieff and Ouspensky's claim that ordinary human beings live in a state of waking sleep, reacting mechanically without unified will or consciousness, and that the spiritual path begins with recognising this condition.

The passage details the limitations of the human psychic apparatus that restrict perception to three dimensions, aligning with Ouspensky's concept of mechanical limitation.

All passages →
Sunyata Emptinesssoteriology

The Buddhist doctrine that all phenomena lack independent self-nature; emptiness as the positive recognition that things arise only in dependence on conditions — distinct from kenoma's mere deficiency.

The three-dimensional world is characterized as an illusion, phantom host, or delusion rather than true reality.

All passages →
Numerical Mysticismtheology

Numbers, proportions, and mathematical relationships as the underlying structure of divine reality.

[auto] The passage treats dimensions (two, three, four) and units of reasoning as structural keys to understanding the underlying reality of space and existence.

All passages →
Spiritual Ascentpraxis

A staged journey of the soul upward through heavenly realms or levels of being toward the divine source.

[auto] The text describes a developmental process where the human subject evolves a higher 'fourth unit of reasoning' to perceive higher dimensions of reality.

All passages →
Related passages · 7 parallels
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 9, Section 1b
Dante passes outwards through the concentric spheres of space to the Empyrean which is beyond space and encloses it. There he sees the Empyrean as a point and his whole journey from sphere to sphere as a journey inwards instead of outwards…”
Both passages explore the idea that our perception of reality is limited and shaped by our cognitive apparatus. Passage A discusses the dependence of spatial dimensions on our psychic apparatus, while Passage B describes the mystical experience of perceiving God beyond spatial dimensions, highlighting the limitations of human perception.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 102
Section 3 3. The truth may be resumed in this way: There is a lowest power of the Soul, a nearest to earth, and this is interwoven throughout the entire universe: another phase possesses sensation, while yet another includes the Reason whic…”
Both passages explore the relationship between perception and reality, suggesting that our experience of the world is shaped by our cognitive and sensory apparatus. Passage A discusses the dependence of spatial dimensions on the psychic apparatus, while Passage B describes the Soul's different phases and their influence on perception and movement, both implying that reality is shaped by higher dimensions or principles beyond ordinary perception.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 369
Section 3 3. For the most convincing proof that vision does not depend upon the transmission of impressions of any kind made upon the air, we have only to consider that in the darkness of night we can see a fire and the stars and their very…”
Both passages explore the nature of perception and the relationship between the observer and the observed. They discuss how the way we perceive the world is influenced by our sensory apparatus and the limitations thereof, suggesting that reality is not as it immediately appears.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 372
Section 6 6. We return, then, to the question whether there could be light if there were no air, the sun illuminating corporeal surfaces across an intermediate void which, as things are, takes the light accidentally by the mere fact of bein…”
Both passages explore the nature of perception and the dependence of our experience of the world on our sensory apparatus. They challenge the conventional understanding of space and vision, suggesting that our perception is limited and constructed by our cognitive and sensory faculties.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 378 (part 1)
Section 3 3. With this prologue we come to our discussion of Memory. That the soul, or mind, having taken no imprint, yet achieves perception of what it in no way contains need not surprise us; or rather, surprising though it is, we canno…”
Both passages explore the relationship between perception and reality, suggesting that the way beings perceive the world is fundamentally tied to their cognitive apparatus. They both propose that different perceptual capabilities lead to different experiences of reality, though they approach this idea from different philosophical and mystical traditions.
neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 424
Section 8 8. This is the explanation of Plato's Triplicity, in the passage where he names as the Primals the Beings gathered about the King of All, and establishes a Secondary containing the Secondaries, and a Third containing the Tertiarie…”
Both passages explore the nature of perception and reality, suggesting that our understanding of the world is limited by our cognitive apparatus. Passage A discusses the idea that the three-dimensionality of the world is a property of our consciousness, while Passage B describes the Intellectual-Principle as a higher realm of reality that transcends the physical world.
platonism|Plato: Timaeus|Section 1w
in space ], grasping existence in some way or other, or it could not be at all. But true and exact reason, vindicating the nature of true being, maintains that while two things [i.e. the image and space] are different they cannot exist on…”
Both passages explore the nature of perception and reality, suggesting that our understanding of the world is limited by our sensory and cognitive apparatus. They propose that there are higher dimensions or forms of existence beyond our current comprehension, indicating a conceptual parallel in their mystical and philosophical inquiries.