Its nucleus grows, changes, and forms a double cone or spindle, thus, within the cell.
This spindle approaches the surface of the cell, and one half of it is extruded in the form of what are called the " polar cells.
" These polar cells now die, and the embryo develops from the growth and segmentation of the remaining part of the nucleus which is nourished by the substance of the cell.
Then why could not beings have lived thus, and been created in this way -- at the very beginning of human and mammalian evolution?
This may, perhaps, serve as an analogy to give some idea of the process by which the Second Race was formed from the First.
The astral form clothing the Monad was surrounded, as it still is, by its egg-shaped sphere of aura, which here corresponds to the substance of the germ-cell or ovum.
The astral form itself is the nucleus, now, as then, instinct with the principle of life.
When the season of reproduction arrives, the sub- astral " extrudes " a miniature of itself from the egg of surrounding aura.
This germ grows and feeds on the aura till it becomes fully developed, when it gradually separates from its parent, carrying with it its own sphere of aura; just as we see living cells reproducing their like by growth and subsequent division into two.
The analogy with the " polar cells " would seem to hold good, since their death would now correspond to the change introduced by the separation of the sexes, when gestation in utero, i.e., within the cell, became the rule.
" The early Second (Root) Race were the Fathers of the ' Sweat-born '; the later Second (Root) Race were ' Sweat-born ' themselves.
" This passage from the Commentary refers to the work of evolution from the beginning of a Race to its close.
The "Sons of Yoga," or the primitive astral race, had seven stages of evolution racially, or collectively; as every individual Being in it had, and has now.
It is not Shakespeare only who divided the ages of man into a series of seven, but Nature herself.
Thus the first sub-races of the Second Race were born at first by the process described on the law of analogy; while the last began gradually, pari passu with the evolution of the human body, to be formed otherwise.
The process of reproduction had seven stages also [[Footnote(s)]] ------------------------------------------------- * See Book I.
Part I.
Stanza VII Commentary 10 .
[[Vol.
2, Page]] 118 THE SECRET DOCTRINE.
in each Race, each covering aeons of time.
What physiologist or biologist could tell whether the present mode of generation, with all its phases of gestation, is older than half a million, or at most one million of years, since their cycle of observation began hardly half a century ago.
Primeval human hermaphrodites are a fact in Nature well known to the ancients, and form one of Darwin's greatest perplexities.
Yet there is certainly no impossibility, but, on the contrary, a great probability that hermaphroditism existed in the evolution of the early races; while on the grounds of analogy, and on that of the existence of one universal law in physical evolution, acting indifferently in the construction of plant, animal, and man, it must be so.
The mistaken theories of mono-genesis, and the descent of man from the mammals instead of the reverse, are fatal to the completeness of evolution as taught in modern schools on Darwinian lines, and they will have to be abandoned in view of the insuperable difficulties which they encounter.
Occult tradition -- if the terms Science and Knowledge are denied in this particular to antiquity -- can alone reconcile the inconsistencies and fill the gap.
"If thou wilt know the invisible, open thine eye wide on the visible," says a Talmudic axiom.
In the " Descent of Man "* occurs the following passage; which shows how near Darwin came to the acceptance of this ancient teaching.
"It has been known that in the vertebrate kingdom one sex bears rudiments of various accessory parts appertaining to the reproductive system, which properly belong to the opposite sex.
.
.
.
Some remote progenitor of the whole vertebrate kingdom appears to have been hermaphrodite or androgynous** .
.
.
But here we encounter a singular difficulty.
In the mammalian class the males possess rudiments of a uterus with the adjacent passages in the Vesiculae prostaticae ; they bear also rudiments of mammae, and some male marsupials have traces of a marsupial sac.
Other analogous facts could be added.
Are we then to suppose that some extremely ancient mammal continued androgynous after it had acquired the chief distinctions of its class, and therefore after it had diverged from the lower classes of the vertebrate kingdom?
This seems very improbable,*** for we have to look to fishes, the lowest of all the classes, to find any still existent androgynous forms.
" Mr.
Darwin is evidently strongly disinclined to adopt the hypothesis which the facts so forcibly suggest, viz., that of a primeval androgynous [[Footnote(s)]] ------------------------------------------------- * Second Edition, p.
161.
** And why not all the progenitive first Races, human as well as animal; and why one "remote progenitor"?
*** Obviously so, on the lines of Evolutionism, which traces the mammalia to some amphibian ancestor.
[[Vol.
2, Page]] 119 THE BLASTEMA OF SCIENCE.
stem from which the mammalia sprang.
His explanation runs: -- "The fact that various accessory organs proper to each sex, are found in a rudimentary condition in the opposite sex may be explained by such organs having been gradually acquired by the one sex and then transmitted in a more or less imperfect condition to the other." He instances the case of "spurs, plumes, and brilliant colours, acquired for battle or for ornament by male birds" and only partially inherited by their female descendants.
In the problem to be dealt with, however, the need of a more satisfactory explanation is evident, the facts being of so much more prominent and important a character than the mere superficial details with which they are compared by Darwin.
Why not candidly admit the argument in favour of the hermaphroditism which characterises the old fauna?
Occultism proposes a solution which embraces the facts in a most comprehensive and simple manner.
These relics of a prior androgyne stock must be placed in the same category as the pineal gland, and other organs as mysterious, which afford us silent testimony as to the reality of functions which have long since become atrophied in the course of animal and human progress, but which once played a signal part in the general economy of primeval life.
The occult doctrine, anyhow, can be advantageously compared with that of the most liberal men of science, who have theorised upon the origin of the first man.
Long before Darwin, Naudin, who gave the name of Blastema to that which the Darwinists call protoplasm, put forward a theory half occult and half scientifico-materialistic.
The subtle energy field or membrane surrounding the physical body, described across occultism as a protective boundary and interface through which psychic influence, suggestion, or attack must pass to reach the person within — pierced from within by the victim's own fear or desire, rather than breached from outside by force alone. Distinct from etheric_projection (the double's active departure FROM the body, not a boundary AROUND it) and linga_sharira (the persistent template-form of the subtle body, not its protective perimeter).
The 'egg-shaped sphere of aura' is explicitly described as the surrounding field from which the astral germ extrudes and feeds, functioning as both boundary and nourishing medium.
The Hermetic axiom that the structure of the cosmos is reflected at every scale — 'as above, so below; as within, so without' — making each level a legible map of the others.
The entire passage is structured around the law of analogy, explicitly citing the Talmudic axiom 'If thou wilt know the invisible, open thine eye wide on the visible' and using cell reproduction as a model for astral/cosmic reproduction.
The Stoic and Plotinian doctrine that all parts of the cosmos are bound by hidden affinities, so that a movement in one part resonates through the whole; the metaphysical basis for astrology, magic, and divination.
The 'one universal law in physical evolution, acting indifferently in the construction of plant, animal, and man' expresses the hidden affinity binding all levels of nature in a single structural principle.
The Hermetic doctrine that a masculine-feminine generative principle operates on every plane of being, not only the biological — present at all times as a structural feature of creation itself. Distinct from divine_marriage (a specific reunification event or symbol) and aeons (paired divine beings arranged in syzygies, not a universal structural claim).
The passage extensively discusses the separation of sexes, primeval hermaphroditism, and the androgynous nature of early races as a structural feature of evolution across all planes.
The absolutely simple, undivided first principle from which all multiplicity and existence flows.
The passage explicitly references 'the astral form clothing the Monad' as the principle instinct with life from which the astral reproduction proceeds.