← Home
Select Works of Plotinus · 698 of 752 · tr. Thomas Taylor

Select Works, Section 666

Section 27 27. But what is that whose entry supplies every such need? Some Idea, we maintain. There is a Form to which Matter aspires: to soul, moral excellence is this Form. But is this Form a good to the thing as being apt to it, does the striving aim at the apt? No: the aptest would be the most resemblant to the thing itself, but that, however sought and welcomed, does not suffice for the good: the good must be something more: to be a good to another a thing must have something beyond aptness; that only can be adopted as the good which represents the apt in its better form and is best to what is best in the quester's self, to that which the quester tends potentially to be. A thing is potentially that to which its nature looks; this, obviously, it lacks; what it lacks, of its better, is its good. Matter is of all that most in need; its next is the lowest Form; Form at lowest is just one grade higher than Matter. If a thing is a good to itself, much more must its perfection, its Form, its better, be a good to it; this better, good in its own nature, must be good also to the quester whose good it procures. But why should the Form which makes a thing good be a good to that thing? As being most appropriate? No: but because it is, itself, a portion of the Good. This is why the least alloyed and nearest to the good are most at peace within themselves. It is surely out of place to ask why a thing good in its own nature should be a good; we can hardly suppose it dissatisfied with its own goodness so that it must strain outside its essential quality to the good which it effectually is. There remains the question with regard to the Simplex: where there is utter absence of distinction does this self-aptness constitute the good to that Simplex? If thus far we have been right, the striving of the lower possesses itself of the good as of a thing resident in a certain Kind, and it is not the striving that constitutes the good but the good that calls out the striving: where the good is attained something is acquired and on this acquisition there follows pleasure. But the thing must be chosen even though no pleasure ensued; it must be desirable for its own sake.
Themes
Correspondencecosmology

The Hermetic axiom that the structure of the cosmos is reflected at every scale — 'as above, so below; as within, so without' — making each level a legible map of the others.

The passage notes that anything coming from The Good carries the image and type belonging to that original source.

All passages →
Evil As Privationtheology

Augustinian and Plotinian doctrine that evil has no positive being of its own but is a lack, distortion, or absence of the good — denying ontological dualism while preserving moral seriousness.

The text asserts that nothing worthless can come from the Supreme, implying that evil is not a positive derivation from the Good.

All passages →
Living Godtheology

The divine conceived as active, present, and dynamic—not an abstract principle but a personal responsive reality.

The Supreme is described as the source of 'Life' and 'Activity streaming Thence', characterizing the divine as dynamic rather than static.

All passages →
Unity Of Beingtheology

The doctrine that all existence is ultimately one substance or one divine reality; non-duality as a theological claim.

The text suggests that all items derive from the First and share goodness in their own degree, implying an underlying unity of existence.

All passages →
Divine Simplicitytheology

The doctrine that God has no parts, divisions, or composite attributes; pure undivided being.

[auto] The passage contrasts the 'one source' with the 'many differing things' it produces, implying the undivided nature of the origin.

All passages →
Emanation Hierarchycosmology

A chain of divine beings or principles flowing downward from a single transcendent source (the One or the Father), each level less perfect than the one above.

[auto] The passage explicitly describes the flow of Life and Intellectual-Principle from The Supreme/Good, detailing the hierarchical derivation of reality.

All passages →
Monadcosmology

The absolutely simple, undivided first principle from which all multiplicity and existence flows.

[auto] The text repeatedly references 'The Supreme', 'The First', and 'one source' as the singular origin from which all else flows.

All passages →
Related passages · 3 parallels
christian_mysticism|Pseudo-Dionysius: The Divine Names|Chapter 4, Section 1{
127 There remains but one alternative: Evil is a weakness and deficiency of Good. 31. Good things have all one cause. If evil is opposed to the Good, then hath evil many causes. The efficient causes of evil results, however, are not any…”
Both passages explore the nature of good and evil, emphasizing that evil is a lack or deficiency of good. They share a conceptual parallel in their metaphysical understanding of the relationship between good and evil, though they come from different mystical traditions.
greek_mystery|The Golden Verses of Pythagoras|Section 11
p. 62 PYTHAGOREAN SENTENCES FROM THE PROTREPTICS OF IAMBLICHUS 1. As we live through soul, it must be said that by the virtue of this we live well; just as because we see through the eyes, we see well through the virtue of these. 2. It must…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the good and virtue, emphasizing the intrinsic value of these qualities and their role in the betterment of the self. They share a conceptual parallel in their exploration of the relationship between the soul, virtue, and the good, though they come from different philosophical traditions.
platonism|Plato: Republic|Section 1n
And you would say the same of the conception of the good? Until the person is able to abstract and define rationally the idea of good, and unless he can run the gauntlet of all objections, and is ready to disprove them, not by appeals to o…”
Both passages explore the nature of the good and the pursuit of it, with Plotinus discussing the Form of the Good and its relationship to Matter and the soul, while Plato's dialogue delves into the rational understanding and education required to grasp the idea of the good. Both emphasize the intrinsic value and the striving towards the good.