← Home
Select Works of Plotinus · 434 of 752 · tr. Thomas Taylor

Select Works, Section 412

Section 3 3. Yet, looking at another set of facts, reflection tells us that we are in sympathetic relation to each other, suffering, overcome, at the sight of pain, naturally drawn to forming attachments; and all this can be due only to some unity among us. Again, if spells and other forms of magic are efficient even at a distance to attract us into sympathetic relations, the agency can be no other than the one soul. A quiet word induces changes in a remote object, and makes itself heard at vast distances- proof of the oneness of all things within the one soul. But how reconcile this unity with the existence of a reasoning soul, an unreasoning, even a vegetal soul? [It is a question of powers]: the indivisible phase is classed as reasoning because it is not in division among bodies, but there is the later phase, divided among bodies, but still one thing and distinct only so as to secure sense-perception throughout; this is to be classed as yet another power; and there is the forming and making phase which again is a power. But a variety of powers does not conflict with unity; seed contains many powers and yet it is one thing, and from that unity rises, again, a variety which is also a unity. But why are not all the powers of this unity present everywhere? The answer is that even in the case of the individual soul described, similarly, as permeating its body, sensation is not equally present in all the parts, reason does not operate at every point, the principle of growth is at work where there is no sensation- and yet all these powers join in the one soul when the body is laid aside. The nourishing faculty as dependent from the All belongs also to the All-Soul: why then does it not come equally from ours? Because what is nourished by the action of this power is a member of the All, which itself has sensation passively; but the perception, which is an intellectual judgement, is individual and has no need to create what already exists, though it would have done so had the power not been previously included, of necessity, in the nature of the All.
Themes
Apophatic Theologytheology

Describing the divine only by negation—God transcends all positive categories and concepts; the via negativa.

The generative faculty of the source is described as 'ineffable', indicating limits to conceptual description.

All passages →
Logoscosmology

The divine reason, word, or ordering principle through which the universe was created; mediates between the transcendent God and the material world.

The Intellectual Kosmos and Souls function as mediating ordering principles between the Unity and material forms.

All passages →
Divine Simplicitytheology

The doctrine that God has no parts, divisions, or composite attributes; pure undivided being.

[auto] The source is described as an 'unbroken whole' and a 'concentrated central principle' without division.

All passages →
Emanation Hierarchycosmology

A chain of divine beings or principles flowing downward from a single transcendent source (the One or the Father), each level less perfect than the one above.

[auto] The passage explicitly details a downward flow from Unity to Intellectual Kosmos, then Souls, and finally sense forms.

All passages →
Living Godtheology

The divine conceived as active, present, and dynamic—not an abstract principle but a personal responsive reality.

[auto] The divine power is depicted as dynamic, moving outward forever and actively giving gifts to the universe.

All passages →
Monadcosmology

The absolutely simple, undivided first principle from which all multiplicity and existence flows.

[auto] The text identifies a singular 'unity' as the undivided source from which all multiplicity flows.

All passages →
Unity Of Beingtheology

The doctrine that all existence is ultimately one substance or one divine reality; non-duality as a theological claim.

[auto] The passage suggests that without distinction, all beings would be indiscernibly buried within the unbroken whole.

All passages →
Related passages · 6 parallels
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 3 (part 2)
The last generates the first, as well as the first the second, the third the fourth, up to the last. They are all seven equally eternal." ( Aurora , x. 2.) "If I am sometimes describing only two or three as being active in the generation…”
Both passages describe a complex, interdependent system of divine or cosmic principles that interact harmoniously to create and sustain the universe. They emphasize the eternal nature and interrelationship of these principles, highlighting how they work together without losing their individual qualities.
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 4 (part 3)
7.) "We cannot reasonably suppose any formation or differentiation to have existed in the eternal One from which, or according to which (formation) something could have been made; for if such a form, or predisposition to making a form, had…”
Both passages discuss the emanation of beings from a divine unity or source. They explore the idea of a supreme being generating lesser beings through an inexhaustible power or divine desire, emphasizing the interconnectedness and hierarchy of existence.
egyptian|The Egyptian Book of the Dead (Papyrus of Ani)|Chapter 43 (part 70)
He giveth life to man, He breatheth the breath of life into his nostrils--God is father and mother, the father of fathers, and the mother of mothers. He begetteth, but was never begotten; He produceth, but was never produced; He begat hims…”
Both passages discuss the concept of a supreme, self-existent being and the creation of the world and living beings. They also touch on the immortality of the soul and the hidden, mysterious nature of the divine. The passages come from different traditions but share similar theological insights.
hermeticism|Corpus Hermeticum 11: The Hymn|Section 1c
It must, then, be that such a one as this must be some one who's wholly One. 9. For as the many motions of them [all] are different, and as their bodies are not like, yet has one speed been ordered for them all, it is impossible that ther…”
Both passages discuss the emanation and unity of divine principles, with Plotinus describing the outflow of unity into plurality and the Hermetic text discussing the singular divine maker responsible for all creation. They share a conceptual parallel in their exploration of the relationship between the One and the many, and the nature of divine creation.
jewish_mysticism|The Kabbalah Unveiled|Introduction, Section 1c
The Mantuan Codex terms this the sixth conformation of Macroprosopus, and refers it, as in the case of the fourth conformation, to the primal idea of the Sephira Netzach, victory.] 15. Therein are His two nostrils like mighty galleries, wh…”
Both passages discuss the emanation and creation of the universe from a divine source. Passage A describes the process of emanation from the One in Neoplatonism, while Passage B discusses the emanations of the Sephiroth in Kabbalah. Both traditions explore the idea of a divine unity giving rise to a plurality of beings or realms.
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter XXII (part 3)
These Eleatic ideas—namely that there is and there can be only One Absolute Being, infinite., unchangeable, without a second, without parts and passions—are the same ideas which underlie the Upanishads and have been fully worked out in the…”
Both passages discuss the concept of unity and oneness, with Passage A focusing on the unity of souls within the one soul and Passage B exploring the unity of the divine and the human soul. Both traditions share the insight that there is an underlying unity that connects all things.