← Home
Select Works of Plotinus · 413 of 752 · tr. Thomas Taylor

Select Works, Section 390

Section 8 8. C. (11) We come to the theory that this pneuma is an earlier form, one which on entering the cold and being tempered by it develops into soul by growing finer under that new condition. This is absurd at the start, since many living beings rise in warmth and have a soul that has been tempered by cold: still that is the theory- the soul has an earlier form, and develops its true nature by force of external accidents. Thus these teachers make the inferior precede the higher, and before that inferior they put something still lower, their "Habitude." It is obvious that the Intellectual-Principle is last and has sprung from the soul, for, if it were first of all, the order of the series must be, second the soul, then the nature-principle, and always the later inferior, as the system actually stands. If they treat God as they do the Intellectual-Principle- as later, engendered and deriving intellection from without- soul and intellect and God may prove to have no existence: this would follow if a potentiality could not come to existence, or does not become actual, unless the corresponding actuality exists. And what could lead it onward if there were no separate being in previous actuality? Even on the absurd supposition that the potentially existent brings itself to actuality, it must be looking to some Term, and that must be no potentiality but actual. No doubt the eternally self-identical may have potentiality and be self-led to self-realization, but even in this case the being considered as actualized is of higher order than the being considered as merely capable of actualization and moving towards a desired Term. Thus the higher is the earlier, and it has a nature other than body, and it exists always in actuality: Intellectual-Principle and Soul precede Nature: thus, Soul does not stand at the level of pneuma or of body. These arguments are sufficient in themselves, though many others have been framed, to show that the soul is not to be thought of as a body.
Themes
Body As Obstacleanthropology

The material body viewed as a prison, tomb, or source of error that hinders spiritual knowledge and return.

[auto] The passage argues that if the Soul were corporeal, it could not achieve knowledge or moral excellence, implying materiality hinders spiritual nobility.

All passages →
Divine Simplicitytheology

The doctrine that God has no parts, divisions, or composite attributes; pure undivided being.

[auto] The text insists on a 'unitary percipient' and 'veritable unity' without parts to enable perception, reflecting the attribute of simplicity.

All passages →
Related passages · 12 parallels
christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 11 (part 7)
48.) "The soul and the Word are not one or one being. The soul is born from the centre of nature, from the essences, and belongs to the body, for she issues from the essences of the body, and attracts to herself the body; but the Word is f…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the soul and its relationship to perception and divinity. Passage A emphasizes the unity of the soul in perception, while Passage B describes the soul's relationship with the divine Word, highlighting the penetration and illumination of the soul by the Word. Both explore the concept of unity and the non-material nature of the soul.
hermeticism|Corpus Hermeticum 1: Poimandres|Section 1b
But when He raised His head, I see in Mind the Light, [but] now in Powers no man could number, and Cosmos grown beyond all bounds, and that the Fire was compassed round about by a most mighty Power, and [now] subdued had come unto a stand.…”
Both passages discuss the nature of perception and consciousness, emphasizing the unity and indivisibility of the perceiving entity. Passage A focuses on the Soul as a unitary percipient, while Passage B describes the Mind as a unified entity that perceives and interacts with the cosmos.
platonism|Plato: Phaedo|Section 1o
For admitting that she may be generated and created in some other place, and may have existed before entering the human body, why after having entered in and gone out again may she not herself be destroyed and come to an end? Very true, Si…”
Both passages explore the nature and existence of the soul, discussing its origin, its relationship to the body, and its potential for existence beyond physical life. They both delve into metaphysical arguments about the soul's indestructibility and its higher nature compared to the physical world.
platonism|Plato: Phaedo|Section 1{
For example, when the body is hot and thirsty, does not the soul incline us against drinking? and when the body is hungry, against eating? And this is only one instance out of ten thousand of the opposition of the soul to the things of th…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the soul and its relationship to the body, emphasizing the soul's higher and leading role over the body. They both argue against the soul being a mere product of bodily conditions or harmonies, asserting its superior and independent nature.
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter I (part 4)
Also, all phenomena not in time, divorced from the idea of time, not taken in this or that fashion from the standpoint of before , now , after , would co-exist for us simultaneously, and all mixed up with one another, and our weak mind woul…”
Both passages explore the limitations of human perception and the role of the mind in organizing sensory impressions. They discuss the idea that our understanding of the world is mediated by our cognitive faculties, and that the categories we use (like space and time) are constructs of our consciousness rather than inherent properties of reality.
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter I (part 5)
It is not true because our experimental knowledge is not a confused perception of a real world . It is a very acute perception of an entirely unreal world appearing round about us at the moment of our contact with the world of true causes,…”
Both passages explore the nature of perception and the relationship between the perceiving subject and the external world. They question the reality of the perceived world and the limitations of human senses in understanding true reality, albeit from different philosophical and mystical traditions.
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter VIII (part 2)
______ The formation of perceptions leads to the formation of words , and the appearance of speech . The beginning of speech may appear on the lowest level of psychic life, during the period of living by sensations, and it will become more…”
Both passages explore the relationship between perception, language, and consciousness. Passage A discusses how concepts and words develop from perceptions, while Passage B examines the necessity of a unitary percipient for sense-perception and knowledge. Both highlight the importance of unity in cognition and the role of abstract concepts in higher mental functions.
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter VIII (part 3)
In addition to the simple sensations of these sense organs (color, sound, touch, smell and taste), in addition to the simple emotions of pleasure, pain, joy, anger, surprise, wonder, curiosity and many others, there is passing through our c…”
Both passages explore the relationship between consciousness and perception, discussing how the structure of the mind influences the way we perceive the world. They both delve into the idea that the nature of our psychic apparatus shapes our experience of reality, though they approach it from different philosophical and mystical perspectives.
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter VIII (part 4)
That is to say, Kant's idea would be proven experimentally if we could be convinced that for the being possessing sensations only, the world is one-dimensional; for the being possessing sensations and perceptions the world is two-dimensiona…”
Both passages explore the relationship between the nature of consciousness and the perception of the world. Passage A discusses how different levels of consciousness might perceive the world in different dimensions, while Passage B examines the necessity of a unitary percipient for sense-perception and knowledge. Both texts delve into the philosophical implications of consciousness on perception.
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter XVI (part 11)
All the beings assumed by us to exist in the world of many dimensions , cannot know one another, i.e., cannot know that we are binding them together in different wholes in our phenomenal world, just as in general they cannot know our phenom…”
Both passages explore the limitations of human perception and the nature of consciousness. They discuss the idea that our perception is limited by our own self-elements and that there is a deeper, more unified reality beyond our current understanding.
2 more
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter XVII (part 9)
In ourselves, visual consciousness goes with our eyes, tactile consciousness with our skin. But although neither skin nor eye knows aught of the sensations of the other, they come together and figure in some sort of relation and combinatio…”
Both passages discuss the idea of a higher, unifying consciousness that integrates individual experiences. Passage A explores the concept of an earth-consciousness that encompasses human and animal consciousness, while Passage B discusses the necessity of a unitary percipient for sense-perception and knowledge, suggesting a central unity of consciousness.
western_esoteric|Tertium Organum (P.D. Ouspensky)|Chapter XXIII (part 10)
The mind becomes overcrowded (as it were) with concepts and these are constantly becoming larger, more numerous and more and more complex; some day (the conditions being all favorable) the fusion, or what might be called the chemical union,…”
Both passages discuss the nature of higher consciousness and the limitations of language and perception in expressing or understanding it. Passage A describes the development of cosmic consciousness and its relationship to intellect and language, while Passage B explores the unity of the soul and the impossibility of material explanations for perception and memory.