Select Works of Plotinus · 403 of 752 · tr. Thomas Taylor
Select Works, Section 380
Section 1 1. Whether every human being is immortal or we are wholly destroyed, or whether something of us passes over to dissolution and destruction, while something else, that which is the true man, endures for ever- this question will be answered here for those willing to investigate our nature. We know that man is not a thing of one only element; he has a soul and he has, whether instrument or adjunct in some other mode, a body: this is the first distinction; it remains to investigate the nature and essential being of these two constituents. Reason tells us that the body as, itself too, a composite, cannot for ever hold together; and our senses show us it breaking up, wearing out, the victim of destructive agents of many kinds, each of its constituents going its own way, one part working against another, perverting, wrecking, and this especially when the material masses are no longer presided over by the reconciling soul. And when each single constituent is taken as a thing apart, it is still not a unity; for it is divisible into shape and matter, the duality without which bodies at their very simplest cannot cohere. The mere fact that, as material forms, they have bulk means that they can be lopped and crushed and so come to destruction. If this body, then, is really a part of us, we are not wholly immortal; if it is an instrument of ours, then, as a thing put at our service for a certain time, it must be in its nature passing. The sovereign principle, the authentic man, will be as Form to this Matter or as agent to this instrument, and thus, whatever that relation be, the soul is the man.
Related passages · 11 parallels
◆christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 7 (part 2)
“36.) "In Paradise there is perfect life without disturbance, and a perpetual day, and the paradisiacal man is clear like transparent glass, and he is fully penetrated by the light of the divine sun." 1 ( Signature , xi.
5 1.) His body like…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the human being, particularly the distinction between the inner, divine aspect and the outer, physical aspect. They explore the idea of an immortal or divine self that transcends the physical body, though they use different terminology and cultural contexts.
◆christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 11 (part 7)
“48.) "The soul and the Word are not one or one being.
The soul is born from the centre of nature, from the essences, and belongs to the body, for she issues from the essences of the body, and attracts to herself the body; but the Word is f…”
Both passages explore the relationship between the soul and the body (or Word), discussing their distinct natures and interactions. They both posit a higher, enduring aspect (soul or Word) that interacts with a lower, transient aspect (body), but they do so within different theological frameworks.
◆christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 12 (part 1)
“p.
242 CHAPTER XII.
REDEMPTION.
"God lives also in man.
Therefore if we are but seeking and loving our own (true) self, we then love God.
That which we do to each other we are doing to God.
He who seeks and finds his brother and siste…”
Both passages discuss the relationship between the divine and human nature, emphasizing the need for a transformation or regeneration of the human spirit to achieve a higher, divine state. They both explore the idea of a union between the divine and human, though from different theological perspectives.
◆christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 12 (part 2)
“1 "It was the will of God to transmute humanity, after it had become earthly, again into the celestial quality, to turn the human earth (material element) into heaven, to make out of the four elements only one, and to transform the wrath of…”
Both passages discuss the transformation and redemption of humanity through divine intervention. They explore the idea of a divine being entering human existence to overcome death and restore divine life, though they come from different mystical traditions.
◆christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 13 (part 2)
“265 To form a correct conception of the regeneration of man, and of what kind of a being it is which is to be brought to life in us, we must learn to know what is eternity and time, light and darkness, good and evil, and especially the orig…”
Both passages explore the nature of human existence and the relationship between the spiritual and physical aspects of man. They discuss the duality or tripartite nature of human beings, with one passage emphasizing the divine and dark aspects and the other focusing on the soul and body.
◆christian_mysticism|The Life and Doctrines of Jacob Boehme|Chapter 14 (part 2)
“2.) During his terrestrial existence man can remain consciously in the three worlds, and by the power of the will with which he is endowed penetrate into either one or the other; but after the separation of the soul from the body has taken…”
Both passages discuss the nature of the human soul and its existence after death, emphasizing the importance of the soul's state during earthly life. They both explore the idea that the soul's condition in the afterlife is determined by its condition and choices made during its terrestrial existence.
◆hermeticism|Corpus Hermeticum 10: The Sermon on the Mount|Section 1d
“Spirit pervading [body] by means of veins and arteries and blood, bestows upon the living creature motion, and as it were doth bear it in a way.
For this cause some do think the soul is blood, in that they do mistake its nature, not knowin…”
Both passages explore the nature of the human soul and its relationship to the body, discussing the immortality of the soul and its separation from the physical form. They share a conceptual parallel in their examination of the soul's divine nature and its connection to higher realities.
◆platonism|Plato: Phaedo|Section 1q
“Then reflect, Cebes: is not the conclusion of the whole matter this?-that the soul is in the very likeness of the divine, and immortal, and intelligible, and uniform, and indissoluble, and unchangeable; and the body is in the very likeness…”
Both passages discuss the immortality of the soul and its relationship to the body, emphasizing the soul's divine and enduring nature in contrast to the body's mortal and perishable nature.
◆platonism|Plato: Phaedo|Section 1
“No other proof is needed, he said; for if the immortal, being eternal, is liable to perish, then nothing is imperishable.
Yes, replied Socrates, all men will agree that God, and the essential form of life, and the immortal in general, will…”
Both passages explore the immortality of the soul and the distinction between the mortal body and the immortal soul. They share a conceptual parallel in their discussion of the soul's enduring nature beyond physical death.
◆platonism|Plato: Phaedrus|Section 1n
“The beginning of our proof is as follows:- The soul through all her being is immortal, for that which is ever in motion is immortal; but that which moves another and is moved by another, in ceasing to move ceases also to live.
Only the sel…”
Both passages discuss the immortality of the soul and its relationship to the body. They explore the idea that the soul is the essential, enduring part of a human being, while the body is transient and subject to decay.