The Egyptian Book of the Dead (Papyrus of Ani) · 46 of 357 · tr. E.A. Wallis Budge
Chapter 6 (part 2)
, t.
iv., p.
50 (l.
445).
The allusion here is to the setting of the sun.
4.
I.e.
, Unas.
5.
See page lix.
6.
Recueil de Travaux , t.
iv., p.
61 (ll.
520, 521).] {p.
lvii} 6.
anx anx an mit-k Live life, not shalt thou die.[1] The doctrine of eternal life in the XVIIIth dynasty.
In the papyrus of Ani the deceased is represented as having come to a place remote and far away, where there is neither air to breathe nor water to drink, but where he holds converse with Tmu.
In answer to his question, "How long have I to live?"[2], the great god of Annu answers:-- auk er heh en heh aha en heh Thou shalt exist for millions of millions of years, a period of millions of years.
In the LXXXIVth Chapter, as given in the same papyrus, the infinite duration of the past and future existence of the soul, as well as its divine nature, is proclaimed by Ani in the words:-- nuk Su paut ba-a pu neter ba-a pu heh I am Shu [the god] of unformed matter.
My soul is God, my soul is eternity.[3] When the deceased identifies himself with Shu, he makes the period of his existence coeval with that of Tmu-Ra, i.e.
, he existed before Osiris and the other gods of his company.
These two passages prove the identity of the belief in eternal life in the XVIIIth dynasty with that in the Vth and VIth dynasties.
But while we have this evidence of the Egyptian belief in eternal life, we are nowhere told that man's corruptible body will rise again; indeed, the following extracts show that the idea prevailed that the body lay in the earth while the soul or spirit lived in heaven.
1.
ba ar pet sat ar ta Soul to heaven, body to earth.[4] (Vth dynasty.) [1.
Recueil de Travaux , t.
v., p.
170 (Pepi, 1.
85).
2.
###.
Plate XIX., l.
16 (Book of the Dead, Chapter CLXXV.).
3.
Plate XXVIII., 1.
15.
4 Recueil de Travaux , t.
iv., p.
71 (l.
582).] {p.
lvii} 2.
mu-k er pet xa-k er ta Thy essence is in heaven, thy body to earth.[1] (VIth dynasty.) 3.
pet xer ba-k ta xeri tut-k Heaven hath thy soul, earth hath thy body.[2] (Ptolemaic period.) Constancy in the belief in the resurrection.
There is, however, no doubt that from first to last the Egyptians firmly believed that besides the soul there was some other element of the man that would rise again.
The preservation of the corruptible body too was in some way connected with the life in the world to come, and its preservation was necessary to ensure eternal life; otherwise the prayers recited to this end would have been futile, and the time honoured custom of mummifying the dead would have had no meaning.
The never ending existence of the soul is asserted in a passage quoted above without reference to Osiris; but the frequent mention of the uniting of his bones, and of the gathering together of his members,[3] and the doing away with all corruption from his body, seems to show that the pious Egyptian connected these things with the resurrection of his own body in some form, and he argued that what had been done for him who was proclaimed to be giver and source of life must be necessary for mortal man.
Related passages · 3 parallels
◆neoplatonism|Select Works of Plotinus|Select Works, Section 395
“Section 11 11. (16) What intelligent mind can doubt the immortality of such a value, one in which there is a life self-springing and therefore not to be destroyed? This is at any rate a life not imported from without, not present in the mod…”
Both passages discuss the concept of immortality and the eternal nature of the soul. Passage A from Plotinus emphasizes the self-springing life and immortality of the soul as an independent principle, while Passage B from the Egyptian text describes the eternal existence of the soul and its divine nature. Both traditions share a belief in the soul's immortality and its independent existence beyond physical death.
◆platonism|Plato: Phaedo|Section 1k
“That is clear, he replied.
Then the inference is, that our souls are in the world below?
That is true.
And one of the two processes or generations is visible-for surely the act of dying is visible?
Surely, he said.
And may not the othe…”
Both passages discuss the immortality of the soul and the concept of life after death, with Plato's dialogue exploring the idea of the soul's existence before and after death through philosophical reasoning, while the Egyptian text describes the belief in eternal life and the soul's journey after death. Both traditions share a belief in the continuity of the soul beyond physical death.
◆platonism|Plato: Phaedo|Section 1
“No other proof is needed, he said; for if the immortal, being eternal, is liable to perish, then nothing is imperishable.
Yes, replied Socrates, all men will agree that God, and the essential form of life, and the immortal in general, will…”
Both passages discuss the immortality of the soul and its journey after death. Plato's Phaedo explores the immortality of the soul through philosophical reasoning, while the Egyptian text from the Book of the Dead describes the soul's eternal existence and its journey in the afterlife. Both traditions emphasize the enduring nature of the soul beyond physical death.